| Literature DB >> 24402307 |
Paweł Bogawski1, Lukasz Grewling, Małgorzata Nowak, Matt Smith, Bogdan Jackowiak.
Abstract
A significant increase in summer temperatures has been observed for the period 1996-2011 in Poznań, Poland. The phenological response of four weed taxa, widely represented by anemophilous species (Artemisia spp., Rumex spp. and Poaceae and Urticaceae species) to this recent climate warming has been analysed in Poznań by examining the variations in the course of airborne pollen seasons. Pollen data were collected by 7-day Hirst-type volumetric trap. Trends in pollen seasons were determined using Mann-Kendall test and Sen's slope estimator, whereas the relationships between meteorological and aerobiological data were established by Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Significant trends in pollen data were detected. The duration of pollen seasons of all analysed taxa increased (from +2.0 days/year for Urticaceae to +3.8 days/year for Rumex), which can be attributed to a delay in pollen season end dates rather than earlier start dates. In addition, the intensity of Artemisia pollen seasons significantly decreased and correlates with mean July-September daily minimum temperatures (r = -0.644, p < 0.01). In contrast, no significant correlations were found between temperature and characteristics of Rumex pollen seasons. The results of this study show that observed shifts in weed pollen seasons in Poznań, i.e. longer duration and later end dates, might be caused by the recorded increase in summer temperature. This influence was the strongest in relation to Artemisia, which is the taxon that flowers latest in the year. The general lack of significant correlations between Rumex and Urticaceae pollen seasons and spring and/or summer temperature suggests that other factors, e.g. land use practices, could also be partially responsible for the observed shifts in pollen seasons.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24402307 PMCID: PMC4173066 DOI: 10.1007/s00484-013-0781-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Biometeorol ISSN: 0020-7128 Impact factor: 3.787
Fig. 1Location of Poznań in Europe (a) and pollen trap as well as meteorological station within Poznań administrative boundaries (b)
Results of homogeneity testing
| Month | Homogeneity test | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNHT shift | SNHT trend | Bivariate test | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| April | 5.07 | 2.67 | 1.66 | 1.56 | 2.33 | 1.34 | 6.11 | 2.66 | 2.49 |
| May | 2.32 | 3.00 | 4.33 | 1.77 | 0.60 | 3.16 | 3.34 | 3.97 | 5.59 |
| June | 7.00* | 9.22* | 3.69 | 5.56 | 8.37* | 3.59 | 7.42* | 9.85* | 6.28 |
| July | 4.56 | 5.96 | 5.40 | 4.32 | 6.05 | 4.60 | 6.26 | 6.18 | 6.41 |
| August | 1.66 | 2.32 | 6.14 | 1.34 | 1.98 | 5.01 | 2.88 | 2.75 | 6.65 |
| September | 3.57 | 2.50 | 5.06 | 4.31 | 2.80 | 4.70 | 5.77 | 5.90 | 4.88 |
Average minimum, maximum and mean monthly temperature series tested with three kinds of relative homogeneity test
*p < 0.05
Significant temperature trends in Poznań (1996–2011) calculated from homogeneous series: Mann–Kendall trend test (test Z column), Sen’s slope estimation (Q column) and the limits of confidence interval (95 %: Q min95 and Q max 95)
| Temperature series | Test |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 2.026* | 0.18 | 0.004 | 0.372 |
|
| 2.746** | 0.16 | 0.063 | 0.209 |
|
| 2.476* | 0.15 | 0.056 | 0.246 |
|
| 2.566* | 0.18 | 0.030 | 0.297 |
|
| 2.026* | 0.10 | 0.004 | 0.204 |
|
| 2.116* | 0.12 | 0.015 | 0.198 |
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01
Fig. 2Trend in mean minimum July–September temperature in Poznań (1996–2011). Mann–Kendall trend test (test Z column), Sen’s slope estimation (Q column), and the limits of confidence interval (95 %: Q min95 and Q max95) are presented in Table 2
Descriptive statistics of pollen season parameters in Poznań, 1996–2011
| Taxon | Descriptive statistics | Characteristics of pollen season | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Start date (DOY) | Peak date (DOY) | End date (DOY) | Duration (days) | Peak value (P/m3) | SPI (pollen) | ||
| Poaceae | Max | 149 | 194 | 273 | 148 | 524 | 7,487 |
| Min | 116 | 149 | 230 | 100 | 108 | 2,272 | |
| Mean | 131 | 177 | 256 | 124 | 279 | 4,100 | |
| SD | 8.9 | 11.9 | 13.4 | 17.1 | 116.2 | 1,368.3 | |
| CV (%) | 6.8 | 6.7 | 5.2 | 13.7 | 41.6 | 33.4 | |
|
| Max | 150 | 200 | 273 | 145 | 153 | 2,496 |
| Min | 119 | 131 | 206 | 83 | 22 | 282 | |
| Mean | 134 | 169 | 249 | 115 | 51 | 1,147 | |
| SD | 7.8 | 18.9 | 19.0 | 20.8 | 31.6 | 462.6 | |
| CV (%) | 5.8 | 11.2 | 7.6 | 18.0 | 62.1 | 40.3 | |
| Urticaceae | Max | 160 | 227 | 274 | 149 | 1080 | 22,414 |
| Min | 120 | 176 | 240 | 87 | 162 | 662 | |
| Mean | 147 | 203 | 261 | 114 | 534 | 10,197 | |
| SD | 11.6 | 13.4 | 11.3 | 16.9 | 312.2 | 5,728.9 | |
| CV (%) | 7.9 | 6.6 | 4.3 | 14.8 | 58.5 | 56.2 | |
|
| Max | 208 | 228 | 271 | 81 | 439 | 3,429 |
| Min | 189 | 209 | 241 | 36 | 35 | 369 | |
| Mean | 198 | 219 | 253 | 56 | 137 | 1,421 | |
| SD | 5.0 | 4.8 | 11.7 | 15.1 | 104.1 | 809.0 | |
| CV (%) | 2.5 | 2.2 | 4.5 | 27.0 | 75.9 | 56.9 | |
Mann–Kendall trend test (test Z column) and Sen’s slope estimate (Q column) of pollen season parameters of weed taxa
| Pollen season parameter | Poaceae |
| Urticaceae |
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Test |
| Test |
| Test |
| Test |
| |
| Start date (DOY) | −2.12* | −1.03 | −0.59 | −0.31 | −1.04 | −0.39 | −2.86** | −0.75 |
| End date (DOY) | 2.7** | 1.86 | 2.66** | 2.81 | 2.60** | 1.41 | 2.26* | 1.27 |
| Peak date (DOY) | −0.27 | −0.22 | 1.40 | 1.56 | −1.22 | −0.79 | 0.46 | 0.10 |
| Duration (days) | 3.52** | 3.00 | 2.75** | 3.76 | 2.12* | 2.00 | 2.75** | 2.49 |
| Peak value (P/m3) | −0.81 | −6.56 | −1.67 | −1.50 | 0.41 | 7.96 | −1.76 | −7.32 |
| SPI (pollen) | −0.41 | −58.5 | −1.22 | −11.75 | 1.49 | 517.17 | −2.12* | −81.33 |
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01
Spearman correlation coefficients between the pollen season parameters and homogenous monthly temperature series recorded in Poznań (1996–2011)
| Taxon | Pollen season parameter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Poaceae | Start date | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Peak date | −0.625* | – | ns | ns | – | – | |
| End date | ns | ns | ns | 0.515* | 0.627* | 0.670** | |
| Duration | ns | ns | 0.536* | 0.649** | 0.780** | 0.830** | |
| Peak value | −0.631* | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
| SPI | −0.632* | −0.553* | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
|
| Start date | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Peak date | ns | – | ns | ns | – | – | |
| End date | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
| Duration | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
| Peak value | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
| SPI | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
| Urticaceae | Start date | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Peak date | −0.512* | – | ns | ns | ns | – | |
| End date | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
| Duration | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
| Peak value | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
| SPI | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
|
| Start date | −0.562* | – | −0.728** | −0.805** | – | – |
| Peak date | ns | – | ns | ns | ns | – | |
| End date | ns | ns | ns | 0.552* | 0.565* | 0.626* | |
| Duration | 0.532* | 0.691** | 0.686** | 0.732** | 0.670** | 0.750** | |
| Peak value | ns | ns | −0.629* | −0.547* | ns | −0.635** | |
| SPI | ns | ns | −0.571* | −0.521* | −0.615* | −0.644** |
ns not significant
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01