| Literature DB >> 27034675 |
Hadeel A Khalil1, Ahmed F El-Yazbi2, Tarek S Belal1, Dalia A Hamdy1.
Abstract
Purpose. Developing a validated HPLC-DAD method for simultaneous determination of posaconazole (PSZ) and vincristine (VCR) in rat plasma. Methods. PSZ, VCR, and itraconazole (ITZ) were extracted from 200 μL plasma using diethyl ether in the presence of 0.1 M sodium hydroxide solution. The organic layer was evaporated in vacuo and dried residue was reconstituted and injected through HC-C18 (4.6 × 250 mm, 5 μm) column. In the mobile phase, acetonitrile and 0.015 M potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate (30 : 70 to 80 : 20, linear gradient over 7 minutes) pumped at 1.5 mL/min. VCR and PSZ were measured at 220 and 262 nm, respectively. Two Sprague Dawley rats were orally dosed PSZ followed by iv dosing of VCR and serial blood sampling was performed. Results. VCR, PSZ, and ITZ were successfully separated within 11 min. Calibration curves were linear over the range of 50-5000 ng/mL for both drugs. The CV% and % error of the mean were ≤18% and limit of quantitation was 50 ng/mL for both drugs. Rat plasma concentrations of PSZ and VCR were simultaneously measured up to 72 h and their calculated pharmacokinetics parameters were comparable to the literature. Conclusion. The assay was validated as per ICH guidelines and is appropriate for pharmacokinetics drug-drug interaction studies.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 27034675 PMCID: PMC4807048 DOI: 10.1155/2015/743915
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Anal Chem ISSN: 1687-8760 Impact factor: 1.885
Figure 1Chromatogram of (a) rat plasma spiked with 2500 ng/mL of VCR and PSZ, (b) rat plasma obtained after 6 h of oral PSZ dosing, and (c) blank rat plasma measured at 262 nm. The inset shows a section of a chromatogram for rat plasma spiked with 2500 ng/mL of VCR measured at 220 nm.
Figure 2Linearity and regression for the determination of PSZ and VCR in rat plasma.
Precision and accuracy for the determination of PSZ and VCR in rat plasma using the proposed HPLC-DAD method.
| Nominal concentration ng/mL | Drug | Intraday mean ± SD (intraday CV%) | Interday mean ± SD, ng/mL | Interday CV% | Interday mean error% | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50 | PSZ | 57.3 ± 10.5 (18.2) | 54.9 ± 9.54 (17.4) | 57.4 ± 0.86 (1.49) | 56.5 ± 0.05 | 1.36 | 13.1 |
| VCR | 50.3 ± 5.99 (11.9) | 56.2 ± 2.21 (3.93) | 47.3 ± 3.07 (6.48) | 51.3 ± 4.5 | 8.78 | 2.53 | |
|
| |||||||
| 500 | PSZ | 539 ± 29.8 (5.54) | 516 ± 68.3 (13.2) | 520 ± 32.1 (6.18) | 524 ± 12.0 | 2.28 | 4.99 |
| VCR | 528 ± 27.5 (5.21) | 495 ± 17.4 (3.50) | 540 ± 56.9 (10.5) | 521 ± 23.0 | 4.41 | 4.25 | |
|
| |||||||
| 2500 | PSZ | 2460 ± 383 (15.6) | 2413 ± 127 (5.25) | 2579 ± 270 (10.5) | 2483 ± 85.7 | 3.45 | −0.65 |
| VCR | 2494 ± 282 (11.3) | 2646 ± 186 (7.03) | 2476 ± 264 (10.7) | 2539 ± 93.6 | 3.69 | 1.54 | |
Figure 3Plasma concentration versus time curves for PSZ and VCR in two rats that were given 40 mg/kg PSZ orally followed by i.v. dosing of 0.1 mg/kg VCR 30 minutes later.