Literature DB >> 27034061

An Exploration of System-Level Factors and the Geographic Variation in Bariatric Surgery Utilization.

Ryan Macht1, Amy Rosen2,3, Garrick Horn4, Brian Carmine2, Donald Hess2.   

Abstract

There is wide geographic variation in bariatric surgery rates, although higher regional rates of obesity are not correlated with higher rates of surgery. In this study, four system-level factors were explored as contributors to this geographic variation. Geographic utilization rates of bariatric surgery showed no correlation to the number of bariatric surgeons, number of accredited centers, and the percentage of patients with a recent primary care visit. The total number of surgical discharges was weakly correlated with bariatric surgery rates (r = 0.26, p = <0.001). As surgeon supply, accredited bariatric centers, overall surgical volume, and access to primary care do not appear to heavily influence bariatric surgery rates, future studies are needed to identify additional factors that may explain the underutilization of bariatric surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bariatric surgery; Geographic variation; Obesity treatment disparities; Surgeon supply; System-level factors

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27034061     DOI: 10.1007/s11695-016-2164-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Surg        ISSN: 0960-8923            Impact factor:   4.129


  6 in total

1.  Access to care and the surgeon shortage: American Surgical Association forum.

Authors:  George F Sheldon
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Geographic inequity in access to livers for transplantation.

Authors:  Heidi Yeh; Elizabeth Smoot; David A Schoenfeld; James F Markmann
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  A silent response to the obesity epidemic: decline in US physician weight counseling.

Authors:  Jennifer L Kraschnewski; Christopher N Sciamanna; Heather L Stuckey; Cynthia H Chuang; Erik B Lehman; Kevin O Hwang; Lisa L Sherwood; Harriet B Nembhard
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 4.  Patient and Referring Practitioner Characteristics Associated With the Likelihood of Undergoing Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Luke M Funk; Sally Jolles; Laura E Fischer; Corrine I Voils
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 14.766

5.  Rural-Urban Differences in Access to Specialist Providers of Colorectal Cancer Care in the United States: A Physician Workforce Issue.

Authors:  Jonathan K Aboagye; Heather E Kaiser; Awori J Hayanga
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 14.766

6.  Variation in the use of minimally invasive bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Lindsay E Kuo; Kristina D Simmons; Noel N Williams; Rachel R Kelz
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 4.734

  6 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Bariatric surgery barriers: a review using Andersen's Model of Health Services Use.

Authors:  Joseph R Imbus; Corrine I Voils; Luke M Funk
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 4.734

2.  Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Bariatric Procedures for Weight Loss: A PCORnet Cohort Study.

Authors:  David Arterburn; Robert Wellman; Ana Emiliano; Steven R Smith; Andrew O Odegaard; Sameer Murali; Neely Williams; Karen J Coleman; Anita Courcoulas; R Yates Coley; Jane Anau; Roy Pardee; Sengwee Toh; Cheri Janning; Andrea Cook; Jessica Sturtevant; Casie Horgan; Kathleen M McTigue
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Geographic Variation in Obesity, Behavioral Treatment, and Bariatric Surgery for Veterans.

Authors:  Matthew L Maciejewski; David E Arterburn; Theodore S Z Berkowitz; Hollis J Weidenbacher; Chuan-Fen Liu; Maren K Olsen; Luke M Funk; James E Mitchell; Valerie A Smith
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 5.002

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.