Jonathan Elmer1,2, John J Gianakas3, Jon C Rittenberger4, Maria E Baldwin5, John Faro4, Cheryl Plummer6, Lori A Shutter7,8,9, Christina L Wassel10, Clifton W Callaway4, Anthony Fabio3. 1. Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. elmerjp@upmc.edu. 2. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Iroquois Building, Suite 400A, 3600 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA. elmerjp@upmc.edu. 3. Epidemiology Data Center, Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 4. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Iroquois Building, Suite 400A, 3600 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA. 5. Department of Neurology, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 6. Division of Clinical Neurophysiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 7. Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 8. Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 9. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 10. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Existing studies of quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG) as a prognostic tool after cardiac arrest (CA) use methods that ignore the longitudinal pattern of qEEG data, resulting in significant information loss and precluding analysis of clinically important temporal trends. We tested the utility of group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM) for qEEG classification, focusing on the specific example of suppression ratio (SR). METHODS: We included comatose CA patients hospitalized from April 2010 to October 2014, excluding CA from trauma or neurological catastrophe. We used Persyst®v12 to generate SR trends and used semi-quantitative methods to choose appropriate sampling and averaging strategies. We used GBTM to partition SR data into different trajectories and regression associate trajectories with outcome. We derived a multivariate logistic model using clinical variables without qEEG to predict survival, then added trajectories and/or non-longitudinal SR estimates, and assessed changes in model performance. RESULTS: Overall, 289 CA patients had ≥36 h of EEG yielding 10,404 h of data (mean age 57 years, 81 % arrested out-of-hospital, 33 % shockable rhythms, 31 % overall survival, 17 % discharged to home or acute rehabilitation). We identified 4 distinct SR trajectories associated with survival (62, 26, 12, and 0 %, P < 0.0001 across groups) and CPC (35, 10, 4, and 0 %, P < 0.0001 across groups). Adding trajectories significantly improved model performance compared to adding non-longitudinal data. CONCLUSIONS: Longitudinal analysis of continuous qEEG data using GBTM provides more predictive information than analysis of qEEG at single time-points after CA.
BACKGROUND: Existing studies of quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG) as a prognostic tool after cardiac arrest (CA) use methods that ignore the longitudinal pattern of qEEG data, resulting in significant information loss and precluding analysis of clinically important temporal trends. We tested the utility of group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM) for qEEG classification, focusing on the specific example of suppression ratio (SR). METHODS: We included comatose CA patients hospitalized from April 2010 to October 2014, excluding CA from trauma or neurological catastrophe. We used Persyst®v12 to generate SR trends and used semi-quantitative methods to choose appropriate sampling and averaging strategies. We used GBTM to partition SR data into different trajectories and regression associate trajectories with outcome. We derived a multivariate logistic model using clinical variables without qEEG to predict survival, then added trajectories and/or non-longitudinal SR estimates, and assessed changes in model performance. RESULTS: Overall, 289 CA patients had ≥36 h of EEG yielding 10,404 h of data (mean age 57 years, 81 % arrested out-of-hospital, 33 % shockable rhythms, 31 % overall survival, 17 % discharged to home or acute rehabilitation). We identified 4 distinct SR trajectories associated with survival (62, 26, 12, and 0 %, P < 0.0001 across groups) and CPC (35, 10, 4, and 0 %, P < 0.0001 across groups). Adding trajectories significantly improved model performance compared to adding non-longitudinal data. CONCLUSIONS: Longitudinal analysis of continuous qEEG data using GBTM provides more predictive information than analysis of qEEG at single time-points after CA.
Authors: M J A Kamps; J Horn; M Oddo; J E Fugate; C Storm; T Cronberg; C A Wijman; O Wu; J M Binnekade; C W E Hoedemaekers Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2013-06-26 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: David B Seder; Gilles L Fraser; Tracy Robbins; Laurel Libby; Richard R Riker Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2009-10-22 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Amy Z Crepeau; Alejandro A Rabinstein; Jennifer E Fugate; Jay Mandrekar; Eelco F Wijdicks; Roger D White; Jeffrey W Britton Journal: Neurology Date: 2013-01-02 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Jeannette Hofmeijer; Marleen C Tjepkema-Cloostermans; Michel J A M van Putten Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2013-10-26 Impact factor: 3.708
Authors: Jon C Rittenberger; Francis X Guyette; Samuel A Tisherman; Michael A DeVita; Rene J Alvarez; Clifton W Callaway Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Sang Hoon Oh; Kyu Nam Park; Young-Min Shon; Young-Min Kim; Han Joon Kim; Chun Song Youn; Soo Hyun Kim; Seung Pill Choi; Seok Chan Kim Journal: Circulation Date: 2015-08-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Marleen C Tjepkema-Cloostermans; Fokke B van Meulen; Gjerrit Meinsma; Michel J A M van Putten Journal: Crit Care Date: 2013-10-22 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Jonathan Elmer; Jon C Rittenberger; John Faro; Bradley J Molyneaux; Alexandra Popescu; Clifton W Callaway; Maria Baldwin Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2016-06-28 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Alexis Steinberg; Jon C Rittenberger; Maria Baldwin; John Faro; Alexandra Urban; Naoir Zaher; Clifton W Callaway; Jonathan Elmer Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2017-12-05 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Pawan Solanki; Patrick J Coppler; Jan Terje Kvaløy; Maria A Baldwin; Clifton W Callaway; Jonathan Elmer Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2019-07-17 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Jonathan Elmer; Bobby L Jones; Vladimir I Zadorozhny; Juan Carlos Puyana; Kate L Flickinger; Clifton W Callaway; Daniel Nagin Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2019-02-27 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Ruchira M Jha; Jonathan Elmer; Benjamin E Zusman; Shashvat Desai; Ava M Puccio; David O Okonkwo; Seo Young Park; Lori A Shutter; Jessica S Wallisch; Yvette P Conley; Patrick M Kochanek Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Jon C Rittenberger; Alexandra Weissman; Maria Baldwin; Kathryn Flickinger; Melissa J Repine; Francis X Guyette; Ankur A Doshi; Cameron Dezfulian; Clifton W Callaway; Jonathan Elmer Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2018-12-31 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Callie M Drohan; Alessandra I Cardi; Jon C Rittenberger; Alexandra Popescu; Clifton W Callaway; Maria E Baldwin; Jonathan Elmer Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2017-12-02 Impact factor: 5.262