Literature DB >> 30825550

A novel methodological framework for multimodality, trajectory model-based prognostication.

Jonathan Elmer1, Bobby L Jones2, Vladimir I Zadorozhny3, Juan Carlos Puyana4, Kate L Flickinger4, Clifton W Callaway4, Daniel Nagin5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Prognostic tools typically combine several time-invariant clinical predictors using regression models that yield a single, time-invariant outcome prediction. This results in considerable information loss as repeatedly or continuously sampled data are aggregated into single summary measures. We describe a method for real-time multivariate outcome prediction that accommodates both longitudinal data and time-invariant clinical characteristics.
METHODS: We included comatose patients treated after resuscitation from cardiac arrest who underwent ≥6 h of electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring. We used Persyst v13 (Persyst Development Corp, Prescott AZ) to generate quantitative EEG (qEEG) features and calculated hourly summaries of whole brain suppression ratio and amplitude-integrated EEG. We randomly selected half of subjects as a training sample and used the other half as a test sample. We applied group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM) to the training sample to group patients based on qEEG evolution, then estimated the relationship of group membership and clinical covariates with awakening from coma and surviving to hospital discharge using logistic regression. We used these parameters to calculate posterior probabilities of group membership (PPGMs) in the test sample, and built three prognostic models: adjusted logistic regression (no GBTM), unadjusted GBTM (no clinical covariates) and adjusted GBTM (all data). We compared these models performance characteristics.
RESULTS: We included 723 patients. Group-specific outcome estimates from a 7-group GBTM ranged from 0 to 75%. Compared to unadjusted GBTM, adjusted GBTM calibration was significantly improved at 6 and 12 h, and time to an outcome estimate <10% and <5% were significantly shortened. Compared to simple logistic regression, adjusted GBTM identified a substantially larger proportion of subjects with outcome probability <1%.
CONCLUSIONS: We describe a novel methodology for combining GBTM output and clinical covariates to estimate patient-specific prognosis over time. Refinement of such methods should form the basis for new avenues of prognostication research that minimize loss of clinically important information.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytics; Cardiac arrest; Data; Electroencephalography; Precision medicine; Prognostication

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30825550      PMCID: PMC6471615          DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.02.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  25 in total

1.  A validated prediction tool for initial survivors of in-hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Paul S Chan; John A Spertus; Harlan M Krumholz; Robert A Berg; Yan Li; Comilla Sasson; Brahmajee K Nallamothu
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2012-06-25

2.  Multi-Trajectory Models of Chronic Kidney Disease Progression.

Authors:  Philipp Burckhardt; Daniel S Nagin; Rema Padman
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2017-02-10

3.  Clinically distinct electroencephalographic phenotypes of early myoclonus after cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Jonathan Elmer; Jon C Rittenberger; John Faro; Bradley J Molyneaux; Alexandra Popescu; Clifton W Callaway; Maria Baldwin
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 10.422

4.  Group-based trajectory modeling in clinical research.

Authors:  Daniel S Nagin; Candice L Odgers
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 18.561

5.  Validation of the Pittsburgh Cardiac Arrest Category illness severity score.

Authors:  Patrick J Coppler; Jonathan Elmer; Luis Calderon; Alexa Sabedra; Ankur A Doshi; Clifton W Callaway; Jon C Rittenberger; Cameron Dezfulian
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 5.262

6.  Sick individuals and sick populations.

Authors:  G Rose
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 7.196

7.  Modelling Risk of Cardio-Respiratory Instability as a Heterogeneous Process.

Authors:  Lujie Chen; Artur Dubrawski; Gilles Clermont; Marilyn Hravnak; Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2015-11-05

8.  Association of early withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy for perceived neurological prognosis with mortality after cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Jonathan Elmer; Cesar Torres; Tom P Aufderheide; Michael A Austin; Clifton W Callaway; Eyal Golan; Heather Herren; Jamie Jasti; Peter J Kudenchuk; Damon C Scales; Dion Stub; Derek K Richardson; Dana M Zive
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 5.262

9.  Statistics review 14: Logistic regression.

Authors:  Viv Bewick; Liz Cheek; Jonathan Ball
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2005-01-13       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Validation of the Cardiac Arrest Survival Postresuscitation In-hospital (CASPRI) score in an East Asian population.

Authors:  Chih-Hung Wang; Wei-Tien Chang; Chien-Hua Huang; Min-Shan Tsai; Ping-Hsun Yu; Yen-Wen Wu; Wen-Jone Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Comparison of parametric and nonparametric methods for outcome prediction using longitudinal data after cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Jonathan Elmer; Bobby L Jones; Daniel S Nagin
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 5.262

2.  Combining Transcranial Doppler and EEG Data to Predict Delayed Cerebral Ischemia After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Hsin Yi Chen; Jonathan Elmer; Sahar F Zafar; Manohar Ghanta; Valdery Moura Junior; Eric S Rosenthal; Emily J Gilmore; Lawrence J Hirsch; Hitten P Zaveri; Kevin N Sheth; Nils H Petersen; M Brandon Westover; Jennifer A Kim
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 3.  Recent applications of quantitative electroencephalography in adult intensive care units: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Sung-Min Cho; Eva K Ritzl; Jaeho Hwang
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 6.682

4.  Evolution of Irritability, Anger, and Aggression after Traumatic Brain Injury: Identifying and Predicting Subgroups.

Authors:  Shannon R Miles; Flora M Hammond; Dawn Neumann; Marc A Silva; Xinyu Tang; Maria Kajankova; Christina Dillahunt-Aspillaga; Risa Nakase-Richardson
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 4.869

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.