Literature DB >> 27032295

Perioperative and oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted vs. open radical cystectomy in bladder cancer patients: A comparison of two high-volume referral centers.

G Gandaglia1, A Karl2, G Novara3, R de Groote4, A Buchner2, F D'Hondt4, F Montorsi5, C Stief2, A Mottrie6, C Gratzke7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine perioperative and oncologic outcomes of open (ORC) and robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) in bladder cancer (BCa) patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: 368 consecutive patients with cT1-4 M0 BCa treated at two high-volume European centers between 2004 and 2013 were evaluated. Data on complications, operative time, blood loss, postoperative transfusion, reoperation, length of stay (LOS), positive margins, recurrence, cancer-specific mortality (CSM), and overall survival were evaluated. Uni- and multivariable regression analyses tested the impact of the surgical approach on perioperative and oncologic outcomes.
RESULTS: Overall, 230 (62.5%) and 138 (37.5%) patients were treated with ORC and RARC. In multivariable analyses RARC patients had higher odds of prolonged operative time and low-grade complications (all P ≤ 0.001). Patients treated with ORC had higher odds of blood loss >500 ml and prolonged LOS (all P ≤ 0.03). No differences were observed in high-grade complications and positive margins (all P ≥ 0.06). No differences were observed in 5-year recurrence-free and CSM-free survival rates between patients treated with ORC vs. RARC (57.1 vs. 54.2% and 61.9 vs. 73.5%; all P ≥ 0.3). This was confirmed in multivariable analyses, where the surgical approach was not associated with the risk of recurrence and CSM (all P ≥ 0.1).
CONCLUSIONS: Although ORC might be associated with a shorter operative time, RARC led to lower blood loss and shorter LOS. No differences exist in high-grade complications and positive margins. RARC and ORC provide similar oncologic control.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bladder cancer; Comparative effectiveness; Open; Radical cystectomy; Robot-assisted

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27032295     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.02.254

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  14 in total

1.  Oncologic outcomes after robot-assisted versus open radical cystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Takehiro Iwata; Shoji Kimura; Beat Foerster; Nicola Fossati; Alberto Briganti; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Kilian M Gust; Shin Egawa; Yasutomo Nasu; Mohammad Abufaraj; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Survival after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: Multicenter comparison between minimally invasive and open approaches.

Authors:  Weibin Xie; Junming Bi; Qiang Wei; Ping Han; Dongkui Song; Lei Shi; Dingwei Ye; Yijun Shen; Xin Gou; Weiyang He; Shaogang Wang; Zheng Liu; Jinhai Fan; Kaijie Wu; Zhiwen Chen; Xiaozhou Zhou; Chuize Kong; Yang Liu; Chunxiao Liu; Abai Xu; Baiye Jin; Guanghou Fu; Wei Xue; Haige Chen; Tiejun Pan; Zhong Tu; Tianxin Lin; Jian Huang
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2020-06-14

3.  Predictors of Recurrence, and Progression-Free and Overall Survival following Open versus Robotic Radical Cystectomy: Analysis from the RAZOR Trial with a 3-Year Followup.

Authors:  Vivek Venkatramani; Isildinha M Reis; Erik P Castle; Mark L Gonzalgo; Michael E Woods; Robert S Svatek; Alon Z Weizer; Badrinath R Konety; Mathew Tollefson; Tracey L Krupski; Norm D Smith; Ahmad Shabsigh; Daniel A Barocas; Marcus L Quek; Atreya Dash; Adam S Kibel; Raj S Pruthi; Jeffrey Scott Montgomery; Christopher J Weight; David S Sharp; Sam S Chang; Michael S Cookson; Gopal N Gupta; Alex Gorbonos; Edward M Uchio; Eila Skinner; Nachiketh Soodana-Prakash; Maria F Becerra; Sanjaya Swain; Kerri Kendrick; Joseph A Smith; Ian M Thompson; Dipen J Parekh
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Risks and benefits of pelvic lymphadenectomy in octogenarians undergoing radical cystectomy due to urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

Authors:  M Grabbert; T Grimm; A Buchner; A Kretschmer; M Apfelbeck; G Schulz; F Jokisch; B-S Schneevoigt; C G Stief; A Karl
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 5.  Pushing the Envelope: Laparoscopic Nephrectomy as Outpatient Surgery.

Authors:  Nessn H Azawi; Tom Christensen; Claus Dahl; Lars Lund
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-01-27       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 6.  Current evidence for robotic surgery in radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Chi Hang Yee; Jeremy Yuen-Chun; Eddie Shu-Yin Chan
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2020-09-22

7.  Peri-Operative Outcomes after Open and Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy by Using an Advanced Bipolar Seal and Cut Technology (Caiman®): A Prospective, Comparative, and Multi-Institutional Study.

Authors:  Marco Borghesi; Riccardo Schiavina; Alessandro Antonelli; Carlo Buizza; Antonio Celia; Paolo Parma; Bernardino De Concilio; Francesco Mengoni; Daniele Romagnoli; Giacomo Saraceni; Eugenio Brunocilla; Angelo Porreca
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2019-03-08

8.  Robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in adults.

Authors:  Bhavan Prasad Rai; Jasper Bondad; Nikhil Vasdev; Jim Adshead; Tim Lane; Kamran Ahmed; Mohammed S Khan; Prokar Dasgupta; Khurshid Guru; Piotr L Chlosta; Omar M Aboumarzouk
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-04-24

9.  Is robotic approach useful to palliate advanced bladder cancer? A monocentric single surgeon experience.

Authors:  Federico Mineo Bianchi; Daniele Romagnoli; Daniele D'Agostino; Paolo Corsi; Marco Giampaoli; Antonio Salvaggio; Riccardo Schiavina; Eugenio Brunocilla; Walter Artibani; Angelo Porreca
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2019-04-24

Review 10.  Utility of robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Takuya Koie; Chikara Ohyama; Kazuhide Makiyama; Toru Shimazui; Tomoaki Miyagawa; Kosuke Mizutani; Tomohiro Tsuchiya; Taku Kato; Keita Nakane
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 3.369

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.