| Literature DB >> 27031477 |
Emily C Edmonds1, Lisa Delano-Wood1,2, Amy J Jak1,2, Douglas R Galasko1,2,3, David P Salmon3, Mark W Bondi1,2.
Abstract
Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is typically diagnosed using subjective complaints, screening measures, clinical judgment, and a single memory score. Our prior work has shown that this method is highly susceptible to false-positive diagnostic errors. We examined whether the criteria also lead to "false-negative" errors by diagnostically reclassifying 520 participants using novel actuarial neuropsychological criteria. Results revealed a false-negative error rate of 7.1%. Participants' neuropsychological performance, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, and rate of decline provided evidence that an MCI diagnosis is warranted. The impact of "missed" cases of MCI has direct relevance to clinical practice, research studies, and clinical trials of prodromal Alzheimer's disease.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; mild cognitive impairment; misclassification; misdiagnosis; neuropsychology
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27031477 PMCID: PMC4879874 DOI: 10.3233/JAD-150986
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Alzheimers Dis ISSN: 1387-2877 Impact factor: 4.472