Literature DB >> 27028955

Brain structural connectivity distinguishes patients at risk for cognitive decline after carotid interventions.

Salil Soman1, Gautam Prasad2, Elizabeth Hitchner3, Payam Massaband4, Michael E Moseley4, Wei Zhou3, Allyson C Rosen5.   

Abstract

While brain connectivity analyses have been demonstrated to identify ill patients for a number of diseases, their ability to predict cognitive impairment after brain injury is not well established. Traditional post brain injury models, such as stroke, are limited for this evaluation because pre-injury brain connectivity patterns are infrequently available. Patients with severe carotid stenosis, in contrast, often undergo non-emergent revascularization surgery, allowing the collection of pre and post-operative imaging, may experience brain insult due to perioperative thrombotic/embolic infarcts or hypoperfusion, and can suffer post-operative cognitive decline. We hypothesized that a distributed function such as memory would be more resilient in patients with brains demonstrating higher degrees of modularity. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed preoperative structural connectivity graphs (using T1 and DWI MRI) for 34 patients that underwent carotid intervention, and evaluated differences in graph metrics using the Brain Connectivity Toolbox. We found that patients with lower binary component number, binary community number and weighted community number prior to surgery were at greater risk for developing cognitive decline. These findings highlight the promise of brain connectivity analyses to predict cognitive decline following brain injury and serve as a clinical decision support tool. Hum Brain Mapp 37:2185-2194, 2016.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biological markers; brain; brain injuries; carotid stenosis; cognition disorders; connectome; decision making; magnetic resonance imaging; neuroimaging; risk factors

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27028955      PMCID: PMC4867285          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  37 in total

Review 1.  Mapping cognition to the brain through neural interactions.

Authors:  A R McIntosh
Journal:  Memory       Date:  1999 Sep-Nov

2.  Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Peter Bannister; Michael Brady; Stephen Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 3.  Large-scale neurocognitive networks and distributed processing for attention, language, and memory.

Authors:  M M Mesulam
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 10.422

Review 4.  Large-scale brain networks in cognition: emerging methods and principles.

Authors:  Steven L Bressler; Vinod Menon
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  TRACTOGRAPHY DENSITY AND NETWORK MEASURES IN ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE.

Authors:  Gautam Prasad; Talia M Nir; Arthur W Toga; Paul M Thompson
Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging       Date:  2013-04

6.  Prospective neurocognitive evaluation of patients undergoing carotid interventions.

Authors:  Wei Zhou; Elizabeth Hitchner; Kathleen Gillis; Lixian Sun; Rebecca Floyd; Barton Lane; Allyson Rosen
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 4.268

7.  Altered brain network modules induce helplessness in major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Daihui Peng; Feng Shi; Ting Shen; Ziwen Peng; Chen Zhang; Xiaohua Liu; Meihui Qiu; Jun Liu; Kaida Jiang; Yiru Fang; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 4.839

Review 8.  FSL.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Mark W Woolrich; Stephen M Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Altered functional connectivity within and between brain modules in absence epilepsy: a resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Cui-Ping Xu; Shou-Wen Zhang; Tie Fang; Ma Manxiu; Qian Chencan; Chen Huafu; Hong-Wei Zhu; Yong-Jie Li; Liu Zuxiang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Abnormal cortical growth in schizophrenia targets normative modules of synchronized development.

Authors:  Aaron F Alexander-Bloch; Philip T Reiss; Judith Rapoport; Harry McAdams; Jay N Giedd; Ed T Bullmore; Nitin Gogtay
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 13.382

View more
  3 in total

1.  Increased Modularity of Resting State Networks Supports Improved Narrative Production in Aphasia Recovery.

Authors:  E Susan Duncan; Steven L Small
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2016-08-02

2.  Brain Network Modularity Predicts Exercise-Related Executive Function Gains in Older Adults.

Authors:  Pauline L Baniqued; Courtney L Gallen; Michelle W Voss; Agnieszka Z Burzynska; Chelsea N Wong; Gillian E Cooke; Kristin Duffy; Jason Fanning; Diane K Ehlers; Elizabeth A Salerno; Susan Aguiñaga; Edward McAuley; Arthur F Kramer; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 5.750

3.  Progression in Vascular Cognitive Impairment: Pathogenesis, Neuroimaging Evaluation, and Treatment.

Authors:  Xin Zhang; Jiabin Su; Chao Gao; Wei Ni; Xinjie Gao; Yuxin Li; Jun Zhang; Yu Lei; Yuxiang Gu
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 4.139

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.