C K Loo1,2,3,4, V Gálvez1,2, E O'Keefe1, P B Mitchell1,2, D Hadzi-Pavlovic1,2, J Leyden3,5, S Harper3,6, A A Somogyi7,8, R Lai9, C S Weickert1,10,11, P Glue12. 1. School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 2. Black Dog Institute, Randwick, NSW, Australia. 3. Wesley Hospital, Kogarah, NSW, Australia. 4. St George Hospital, Kogarah, NSW, Australia. 5. Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia. 6. University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW, Australia. 7. University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia. 8. Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia. 9. Macquarie Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 10. Schizophrenia Research Institute, Randwick, NSW, Australia. 11. Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, NSW, Australia. 12. Psychological Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This pilot study assessed the feasibility, efficacy and safety of an individual dose-titration approach, and of the intravenous (IV), intramuscular (IM) and subcutaneous (SC) routes for treating depression with ketamine. METHOD:Fifteen treatment-refractory depressed participants receivedketamine or midazolam (control treatment) in a multiple crossover, double-blind study. Ketamine was administered by IV (n = 4), IM (n = 5) or SC (n = 6) injection. Dose titration commenced at 0.1 mg/kg, increasing by 0.1 mg/kg up to 0.5 mg/kg, given in separate treatment sessions separated by ≥1 week, with one placebo control treatment randomly inserted. Mood, psychotomimetic and hemodynamic effects were assessed and plasma ketamine concentrations assayed. RESULTS: Twelve participants achieved response and remission criteria, achieved at doses as low as 0.1 mg/kg. All three routes of administration resulted in comparable antidepressant effects. Fewest adverse effects were noted with the SC route. Antidepressant response, adverse effects and ketamine concentrations were dose-related. CONCLUSION:Antidepressant response occurred at a range of doses and at <0.5 mg/kg. The dose-titration approach is a practical method for optimizing the efficacy - side-effects trade-off on an individual patient basis. This pilot study provides preliminary evidence for SC injection as a practical, feasible and efficacious treatment approach.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: This pilot study assessed the feasibility, efficacy and safety of an individual dose-titration approach, and of the intravenous (IV), intramuscular (IM) and subcutaneous (SC) routes for treating depression with ketamine. METHOD: Fifteen treatment-refractory depressed participants received ketamine or midazolam (control treatment) in a multiple crossover, double-blind study. Ketamine was administered by IV (n = 4), IM (n = 5) or SC (n = 6) injection. Dose titration commenced at 0.1 mg/kg, increasing by 0.1 mg/kg up to 0.5 mg/kg, given in separate treatment sessions separated by ≥1 week, with one placebo control treatment randomly inserted. Mood, psychotomimetic and hemodynamic effects were assessed and plasma ketamine concentrations assayed. RESULTS: Twelve participants achieved response and remission criteria, achieved at doses as low as 0.1 mg/kg. All three routes of administration resulted in comparable antidepressant effects. Fewest adverse effects were noted with the SC route. Antidepressant response, adverse effects and ketamine concentrations were dose-related. CONCLUSION: Antidepressant response occurred at a range of doses and at <0.5 mg/kg. The dose-titration approach is a practical method for optimizing the efficacy - side-effects trade-off on an individual patient basis. This pilot study provides preliminary evidence for SC injection as a practical, feasible and efficacious treatment approach.
Authors: Panos Zanos; Ruin Moaddel; Patrick J Morris; Lace M Riggs; Jaclyn N Highland; Polymnia Georgiou; Edna F R Pereira; Edson X Albuquerque; Craig J Thomas; Carlos A Zarate; Todd D Gould Journal: Pharmacol Rev Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 25.468
Authors: Ashley A Conley; Amber E Q Norwood; Thomas C Hatvany; James D Griffith; Kathryn E Barber Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2021-03-31 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Rachael W Taylor; Lindsey Marwood; Emanuella Oprea; Valeria DeAngel; Sarah Mather; Beatrice Valentini; Roland Zahn; Allan H Young; Anthony J Cleare Journal: Int J Neuropsychopharmacol Date: 2020-12-03 Impact factor: 5.176
Authors: Meng Li; Marie Woelfer; Lejla Colic; Adam Safron; Catie Chang; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Oliver Speck; Helen S Mayberg; Bharat B Biswal; Giacomo Salvadore; Anna Fejtova; Martin Walter Journal: Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci Date: 2018-10-23 Impact factor: 5.270
Authors: Jennifer Swainson; Alexander McGirr; Pierre Blier; Elisa Brietzke; Stéphane Richard-Devantoy; Nisha Ravindran; Jean Blier; Serge Beaulieu; Benicio N Frey; Sidney H Kennedy; Roger S McIntyre; Roumen V Milev; Sagar V Parikh; Ayal Schaffer; Valerie H Taylor; Valérie Tourjman; Michael van Ameringen; Lakshmi N Yatham; Arun V Ravindran; Raymond W Lam Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2020-11-11 Impact factor: 4.356