OBJECTIVE: The reinforcing value of food may be established early in life. Research shows that infant weight status is related to the relative reinforcing value of food versus non-food alternatives (food reinforcing ratio, FRR). The purpose of this pilot study was to assess the effects of a 6-week music enhancement program (Music Together®, n = 14) versus an active play date control group (n = 13) on the FRR in 9- to 16-month-old infants who were high in relative food reinforcement. METHODS: Participating parents and infants attended six weekly 45-min group classes. Parents in the music group and the play date group were encouraged to listen to the Music Together program CD or play with the play date group's toy with their infants at home, respectively. RESULTS: Intent-to-treat analysis showed a decrease in FRR for infants in the music group (mean ± SD: -0.13 ± 0.13) in comparison to a slight increase in the control group (0.04 ± 0.11) (F[1, 24] = 11.86, P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide evidence that relative reinforcing value of food can be reduced by promoting alternative reinforcers at an early age.
OBJECTIVE: The reinforcing value of food may be established early in life. Research shows that infant weight status is related to the relative reinforcing value of food versus non-food alternatives (food reinforcing ratio, FRR). The purpose of this pilot study was to assess the effects of a 6-week music enhancement program (Music Together®, n = 14) versus an active play date control group (n = 13) on the FRR in 9- to 16-month-old infants who were high in relative food reinforcement. METHODS: Participating parents and infants attended six weekly 45-min group classes. Parents in the music group and the play date group were encouraged to listen to the Music Together program CD or play with the play date group's toy with their infants at home, respectively. RESULTS: Intent-to-treat analysis showed a decrease in FRR for infants in the music group (mean ± SD: -0.13 ± 0.13) in comparison to a slight increase in the control group (0.04 ± 0.11) (F[1, 24] = 11.86, P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide evidence that relative reinforcing value of food can be reduced by promoting alternative reinforcers at an early age.
Authors: John R Best; Kelly R Theim; Dana M Gredysa; Richard I Stein; R Robinson Welch; Brian E Saelens; Michael G Perri; Kenneth B Schechtman; Leonard H Epstein; Denise E Wilfley Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2012-08-27
Authors: Leonard H Epstein; Jennifer L Temple; Brad J Neaderhiser; Robbert J Salis; Richard W Erbe; John J Leddy Journal: Behav Neurosci Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 1.912
Authors: Elizabeth Buvinger; Katherine Rosenblum; Alison L Miller; Niko A Kaciroti; Julie C Lumeng Journal: Appetite Date: 2017-02-04 Impact factor: 3.868
Authors: Kai Ling Kong; Stephanie Anzman-Frasca; Leonard H Epstein; Rina D Eiden; Rocco A Paluch Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2020-10-01 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Julie C Lumeng; Heidi M Weeks; Katharine Asta; Julie Sturza; Niko A Kaciroti; Alison L Miller; Katherine Rosenblum; Ashley N Gearhardt Journal: Appetite Date: 2020-05-18 Impact factor: 3.868
Authors: Ashley N Gearhardt; Alison L Miller; Julie Sturza; Leonard H Epstein; Niko Kaciroti; Julie C Lumeng Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2017-10-25 Impact factor: 5.002