Alexis Cournoyer1, Massimiliano Iseppon1, Jean-Marc Chauny1,2, André Denault1,3,4, Sylvie Cossette1,3, Éric Notebaert1,2,5. 1. Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec. 2. Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal, Montréal, Québec. 3. Montreal Heart Institute, Montréal, Québec. 4. Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec. 5. Cité de la Santé de Laval, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tissue oximetry using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is a noninvasive monitor of cerebral oxygenation. This new technology has been used during cardiac arrest (CA) because of its ability to give measures in low-blood-flow situations. The aim of this study was to assess the evidence regarding the association between the types of NIRS measurements (mean, initial, and highest values) and resuscitation outcomes (return of spontaneous circulation [ROSC], survival to discharge, and good neurologic outcome) in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation. METHODS: This review was registered (Prospero CRD42015017380) and is reported as per the PRISMA guidelines. Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL were searched. All studies, except case reports and case series of fewer than five patients, reporting on adults that had NIRS monitoring during CA were eligible for inclusion. Two reviewers assessed the quality of the included articles and extracted the data. The outcome effect was standardized using standardized mean difference (SMD). RESULTS: Twenty nonrandomized observational studies (15 articles and five conference abstracts) were included in this review, for a total of 2,436 patients. We found a stronger association between ROSC and mean NIRS values (SMD = 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.92 to 1.74) than between ROSC and initial NIRS measurements (SMD = 0.51; 95% CI = 0.23 to 0.78). There was too much heterogeneity among the highest NIRS measurements group to perform meta-analysis. Only two of the 75 patients who experienced ROSC had a mean NIRS saturation under 30%. Patients who survived to discharge and who had good neurologic outcome displayed superior combined initial and mean NIRS values than their counterparts (SMD = 1.63; 95% CI = 1.34 to 1.92; and SMD = 2.12; 95% CI = 1.14 to 3.10). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with good resuscitation outcomes have significantly higher NIRS saturations during resuscitation than their counterparts. The types of NIRS measurements during resuscitation influenced the association between ROSC and NIRS saturation. Prolonged failure to obtain a NIRS saturation higher than 30% may be included in a multimodal approach to the decision of terminating resuscitation efforts (Class IIb, Level of Evidence C-Limited Data).
BACKGROUND: Tissue oximetry using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is a noninvasive monitor of cerebral oxygenation. This new technology has been used during cardiac arrest (CA) because of its ability to give measures in low-blood-flow situations. The aim of this study was to assess the evidence regarding the association between the types of NIRS measurements (mean, initial, and highest values) and resuscitation outcomes (return of spontaneous circulation [ROSC], survival to discharge, and good neurologic outcome) in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation. METHODS: This review was registered (Prospero CRD42015017380) and is reported as per the PRISMA guidelines. Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL were searched. All studies, except case reports and case series of fewer than five patients, reporting on adults that had NIRS monitoring during CA were eligible for inclusion. Two reviewers assessed the quality of the included articles and extracted the data. The outcome effect was standardized using standardized mean difference (SMD). RESULTS: Twenty nonrandomized observational studies (15 articles and five conference abstracts) were included in this review, for a total of 2,436 patients. We found a stronger association between ROSC and mean NIRS values (SMD = 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.92 to 1.74) than between ROSC and initial NIRS measurements (SMD = 0.51; 95% CI = 0.23 to 0.78). There was too much heterogeneity among the highest NIRS measurements group to perform meta-analysis. Only two of the 75 patients who experienced ROSC had a mean NIRS saturation under 30%. Patients who survived to discharge and who had good neurologic outcome displayed superior combined initial and mean NIRS values than their counterparts (SMD = 1.63; 95% CI = 1.34 to 1.92; and SMD = 2.12; 95% CI = 1.14 to 3.10). CONCLUSIONS:Patients with good resuscitation outcomes have significantly higher NIRS saturations during resuscitation than their counterparts. The types of NIRS measurements during resuscitation influenced the association between ROSC and NIRS saturation. Prolonged failure to obtain a NIRS saturation higher than 30% may be included in a multimodal approach to the decision of terminating resuscitation efforts (Class IIb, Level of Evidence C-Limited Data).
Authors: Melika Hosseini; Robert H Wilson; Christian Crouzet; Arya Amirhekmat; Kevin S Wei; Yama Akbari Journal: Neurotherapeutics Date: 2020-04 Impact factor: 7.620
Authors: Brian R White; Tiffany S Ko; Ryan W Morgan; Wesley B Baker; Emilie J Benson; Alec Lafontant; Jonathan P Starr; William P Landis; Kristen Andersen; Jharna Jahnavi; Jake Breimann; Nile Delso; Sarah Morton; Anna L Roberts; Yuxi Lin; Kathryn Graham; Robert A Berg; Arjun G Yodh; Daniel J Licht; Todd J Kilbaugh Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2022-07-08 Impact factor: 6.251
Authors: Hasan Ayaz; Wesley B Baker; Giles Blaney; David A Boas; Heather Bortfeld; Kenneth Brady; Joshua Brake; Sabrina Brigadoi; Erin M Buckley; Stefan A Carp; Robert J Cooper; Kyle R Cowdrick; Joseph P Culver; Ippeita Dan; Hamid Dehghani; Anna Devor; Turgut Durduran; Adam T Eggebrecht; Lauren L Emberson; Qianqian Fang; Sergio Fantini; Maria Angela Franceschini; Jonas B Fischer; Judit Gervain; Joy Hirsch; Keum-Shik Hong; Roarke Horstmeyer; Jana M Kainerstorfer; Tiffany S Ko; Daniel J Licht; Adam Liebert; Robert Luke; Jennifer M Lynch; Jaume Mesquida; Rickson C Mesquita; Noman Naseer; Sergio L Novi; Felipe Orihuela-Espina; Thomas D O'Sullivan; Darcy S Peterka; Antonio Pifferi; Luca Pollonini; Angelo Sassaroli; João Ricardo Sato; Felix Scholkmann; Lorenzo Spinelli; Vivek J Srinivasan; Keith St Lawrence; Ilias Tachtsidis; Yunjie Tong; Alessandro Torricelli; Tara Urner; Heidrun Wabnitz; Martin Wolf; Ursula Wolf; Shiqi Xu; Changhuei Yang; Arjun G Yodh; Meryem A Yücel; Wenjun Zhou Journal: Neurophotonics Date: 2022-08-30 Impact factor: 4.212
Authors: Ian K Maconochie; Richard Aickin; Mary Fran Hazinski; Dianne L Atkins; Robert Bingham; Thomaz Bittencourt Couto; Anne-Marie Guerguerian; Vinay M Nadkarni; Kee-Chong Ng; Gabrielle A Nuthall; Gene Y K Ong; Amelia G Reis; Stephen M Schexnayder; Barnaby R Scholefield; Janice A Tijssen; Jerry P Nolan; Peter T Morley; Patrick Van de Voorde; Arno L Zaritsky; Allan R de Caen Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2020-10-21 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Jasmeet Soar; Katherine M Berg; Lars W Andersen; Bernd W Böttiger; Sofia Cacciola; Clifton W Callaway; Keith Couper; Tobias Cronberg; Sonia D'Arrigo; Charles D Deakin; Michael W Donnino; Ian R Drennan; Asger Granfeldt; Cornelia W E Hoedemaekers; Mathias J Holmberg; Cindy H Hsu; Marlijn Kamps; Szymon Musiol; Kevin J Nation; Robert W Neumar; Tonia Nicholson; Brian J O'Neil; Quentin Otto; Edison Ferreira de Paiva; Michael J A Parr; Joshua C Reynolds; Claudio Sandroni; Barnaby R Scholefield; Markus B Skrifvars; Tzong-Luen Wang; Wolfgang A Wetsch; Joyce Yeung; Peter T Morley; Laurie J Morrison; Michelle Welsford; Mary Fran Hazinski; Jerry P Nolan Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2020-10-21 Impact factor: 5.262