Literature DB >> 27027335

Validation of Software Gating: A Practical Technology for Respiratory Motion Correction in PET.

Adam Leon Kesner1, Jonathan Hero Chung1, Kimberly Erin Lind1, Jennifer Jihyang Kwak1, David Lynch1, Darrell Burckhardt1, Phillip Jahhyung Koo1.   

Abstract

Purpose To assess the performance of hardware- and software-gating technologies in terms of qualitative and quantitative characteristics of respiratory motion in positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. Materials and Methods Between 2010 and 2013, 219 fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET examinations were performed in 116 patients for assessment of pulmonary nodules. All patients provided informed consent in this institutional review board-approved study. Acquisitions were reconstructed as respiratory-gated images by using hardware-derived respiratory triggers and software-derived signal (via an automated postprocessing method). Asymmetry was evaluated in the joint distribution of reader preference, and linear mixed models were used to evaluate differences in outcomes according to gating type. Results In blind reviews of reconstructed gated images, software was selected as superior 16.9% of the time (111 of 657 image sets; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 14.0%, 19.8%), and hardware was selected as superior 6.2% of the time (41 of 657 image sets; 95% CI: 4.4%, 8.1%). Of the image sets, 76.9% (505 of 657; 95% CI: 73.6%, 80.1%) were judged as having indistinguishable motion quality. Quantitative analysis demonstrated that the two gating strategies exhibited similar performance, and the performance of both was significantly different from that of nongated images. The mean increase ± standard deviation in lesion maximum standardized uptake value was 42.2% ± 38.9 between nongated and software-gated images, and lesion full width at half maximum values decreased by 9.9% ± 9.6. Conclusion Compared with vendor-supplied respiratory-gating hardware methods, software gating performed favorably, both qualitatively and quantitatively. Fully automated gating is a feasible approach to motion correction of PET images. (©) RSNA, 2016 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27027335     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016152105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  22 in total

1.  The relevance of data driven motion correction in diagnostic PET.

Authors:  Adam Leon Kesner
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Classification and evaluation strategies of auto-segmentation approaches for PET: Report of AAPM task group No. 211.

Authors:  Mathieu Hatt; John A Lee; Charles R Schmidtlein; Issam El Naqa; Curtis Caldwell; Elisabetta De Bernardi; Wei Lu; Shiva Das; Xavier Geets; Vincent Gregoire; Robert Jeraj; Michael P MacManus; Osama R Mawlawi; Ursula Nestle; Andrei B Pugachev; Heiko Schöder; Tony Shepherd; Emiliano Spezi; Dimitris Visvikis; Habib Zaidi; Assen S Kirov
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Software Respiratory Gating of Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography Improves Pulmonary Nodule Detection.

Authors:  Nicholas C D Morley; Daniel R McGowan; Fergus V Gleeson; Kevin M Bradley
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-01-15       Impact factor: 21.405

4.  How to scan who: the delicate balance between selecting the patient and selecting the imaging protocol.

Authors:  Roland Hustinx
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 5.  Enhancing Cardiac PET by Motion Correction Techniques.

Authors:  Mathieu Rubeaux; Mhairi K Doris; Adam Alessio; Piotr J Slomka
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.931

6.  The impact of data-driven respiratory gating in clinical F-18 FDG PET/CT: comparison of free breathing and deep-expiration breath-hold CT protocol.

Authors:  Seo Young Kang; Byung Seok Moon; Hye Ok Kim; Hai-Jeon Yoon; Bom Sahn Kim
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 2.668

Review 7.  Lung cancer screening: nodule identification and characterization.

Authors:  Ioannis Vlahos; Konstantinos Stefanidis; Sarah Sheard; Arjun Nair; Charles Sayer; Joanne Moser
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2018-06

8.  Data-Driven Respiratory Gating Outperforms Device-Based Gating for Clinical 18F-FDG PET/CT.

Authors:  Matthew D Walker; Andrew J Morgan; Kevin M Bradley; Daniel R McGowan
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 9.  Respiratory-gated PET/CT for pulmonary lesion characterisation-promises and problems.

Authors:  Russell Frood; Garry McDermott; Andrew Scarsbrook
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Body motion detection and correction in cardiac PET: Phantom and human studies.

Authors:  Tao Sun; Yoann Petibon; Paul K Han; Chao Ma; Sally J W Kim; Nathaniel M Alpert; Georges El Fakhri; Jinsong Ouyang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.