Literature DB >> 27026777

In vitro chemosensitivity in ovarian carcinoma: Comparison of three leading assays.

Burak Tatar1, Gökhan Boyraz2, İlker Selçuk3, Alper K Doğan4, Alp Usubütün5, Zafer Selçuk Tuncer2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: An alternative approach to the current therapy of ovarian carcinoma is the individualization of treatment by determining the sensitivity of tumoral tissue to chemotherapeutic agents before the initiation of chemotherapy. The objectives of the study are to determine the efficacy of in vitro chemosensitivity assays in ovarian carcinoma and to measure the correlation of three leading assays.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fresh tumoral tissue samples of 26 newly diagnosed primary ovarian cancer patients were studied with 3-(4,5-dimeth-ylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolyum bromide (MTT) assay, adenosine triphosphate-tumor chemosensitivity assay (ATP-TCA) and differential staining cytotoxicity (DISC) assays. Chemosensitivity of tumors were studied for paclitaxel, carboplatin, docetaxel, topotecan, gemcitabine, and doxorubicin with each of the three assays. Subgroup analysis was performed for stage, grade, and histologic type.
RESULTS: The in vitro chemosensitivity results of MTT, ATP, and DISC assays were found to be similar. The subgroups in which in vitro assays would be more useful were encountered for patients with advanced stage and serous histology ovarian carcinoma.
CONCLUSIONS: In vitro chemosensitivity can be determined in ovarian carcinoma with ATP, MTT, or DISC assays before the initiation of chemotherapy. These three assays correlate well with each other and are particularly useful for serous and advanced cancers. Large prospective studies comparing standard versus assay-directed therapy with an endpoint of overall survival are required before routine clinical utilization of these assays.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ATP; DISC; MTT; Ovarian cancer; in vitro chemosensitivity

Year:  2016        PMID: 27026777      PMCID: PMC4794290          DOI: 10.5152/jtgga.2016.16017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc        ISSN: 1309-0380


  19 in total

1.  Further observations on the effects of cancer chemotherapeutic agents on the in vitro dehydrogenase activity of cancer tissue.

Authors:  M M BLACK; F D SPEER
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1954-04       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Tumor chemosensitivity and chemoresistance assays.

Authors:  D H Kern
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1997-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Evaluation of in vitro chemoresponse profiles in women with Type I and Type II epithelial ovarian cancers: An observational study ancillary analysis.

Authors:  Rebecca Previs; Charles A Leath; Robert L Coleman; Thomas J Herzog; Thomas C Krivak; Stacey L Brower; Chunqiao Tian; Angeles Alvarez Secord
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-05-30       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Ovarian cancer incidence in the United States, 1992-1999.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Quirk; Nachimuthu Natarajan
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 5.  Chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer. Advanced Ovarian Cancer Trialists Group.

Authors:  L Stewart
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2000

Review 6.  In vitro chemosensitivity testing and mechanisms of drug resistance.

Authors:  K Tewari; A Manetta
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.075

7.  Tumor heterogeneity and in vitro chemosensitivity testing in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  B U Sevin; J P Perras
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Survival outcomes in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer who were treated with chemoresistance assay-guided chemotherapy.

Authors:  Vera Loizzi; John K Chan; Kathryn Osann; Fabio Cappuccini; Philip J DiSaia; Michael L Berman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Clinical trials of newer regimens for treating ovarian cancer: the rationale for Gynecologic Oncology Group Protocol GOG 182-ICON5.

Authors:  Larry J Copeland; Michael Bookman; Edward Trimble
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Evaluation of a chemoresponse assay as a predictive marker in the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer: further analysis of a prospective study.

Authors:  C Tian; D J Sargent; T C Krivak; M A Powell; M J Gabrin; S L Brower; R L Coleman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  5 in total

1.  Identification of proteins associated with paclitaxel resistance of epithelial ovarian cancer using iTRAQ-based proteomics.

Authors:  Yuanjing Wang; Hongxia Li
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 2.967

2.  A simple in vitro tumor chemosensitivity assay based on cell penetrating peptide tagged luciferase.

Authors:  Tingyu Yu; Jiao Lin; Jin Zhao; Wei Huang; Lingwen Zeng; Zhiyuan Fang; Ning Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Ex Vivo Chemosensitivity Profiling of Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Its Correlation With Clinical Response and Outcome to Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Yi Zhang; Min Ji; Jin-Yan Zhao; Hua-Feng Wang; Chong-Wu Wang; Wei Li; Jing-Jing Ye; Fei Lu; Li-Hui Lin; Yan-Ting Gao; Jie Jin; Li Li; Chun-Yan Ji; Joan Ballesteros; Hong-Hu Zhu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 4.  Benefits of functional assays in personalized cancer medicine: more than just a proof-of-concept.

Authors:  Christophe Bounaix Morand du Puch; Mathieu Vanderstraete; Stéphanie Giraud; Christophe Lautrette; Niki Christou; Muriel Mathonnet
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 11.556

5.  Biological Insights into Chemotherapy Resistance in Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Michelle A Glasgow; Peter Argenta; Juan E Abrahante; Mihir Shetty; Shobhana Talukdar; Paula A Croonquist; Mahmoud A Khalifa; Timothy K Starr
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 5.923

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.