Literature DB >> 27026715

The magnetic orientation of the Antarctic amphipod Gondogeneia antarctica is cancelled by very weak radiofrequency fields.

K Tomanova1, M Vacha2.   

Abstract

Studies on weak man-made radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic fields affecting animal magnetoreception aim for a better understanding of the reception mechanism and also point to a new phenomenon having possible consequences in ecology and environmental protection. RF impacts on magnetic compasses have recently been demonstrated in migratory birds and other vertebrates. We set out to investigate the effect of RF on the magnetic orientation of the Antarctic krill species Gondogeneia antarctica, a small marine crustacean widespread along the Antarctic littoral line. Here, we show that upon release, G. antarctica (held under laboratory conditions) escaped in the magnetically seaward direction along the magnetic sea-land axis (y-axis) of the home beach. However, the animals were disoriented after being exposed to RF. Orientation was lost not only in an RF field with a magnetic flux density of 20 nT, as expected according to the literature, but even under the 2 nT originally intended as a control. Our results extend recent findings of the extraordinary sensitivity of animal magnetoreception to weak RF fields in marine invertebrates.
© 2016. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amphipoda; Larmor frequency; Magnetoreception; Narrow-band magnetic field; Radical pair mechanism

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27026715     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.132878

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  6 in total

1.  Weak radiofrequency fields affect the insect circadian clock.

Authors:  Premysl Bartos; Radek Netusil; Pavel Slaby; David Dolezel; Thorsten Ritz; Martin Vacha
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Transduction of the Geomagnetic Field as Evidenced from alpha-Band Activity in the Human Brain.

Authors:  Connie X Wang; Isaac A Hilburn; Daw-An Wu; Yuki Mizuhara; Christopher P Cousté; Jacob N H Abrahams; Sam E Bernstein; Ayumu Matani; Shinsuke Shimojo; Joseph L Kirschvink
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2019-04-26

Review 3.  Why is it so difficult to study magnetic compass orientation in murine rodents?

Authors:  John Phillips; Rachel Muheim; Michael Painter; Jenny Raines; Chris Anderson; Lukas Landler; Dave Dommer; Adam Raines; Mark Deutschlander; John Whitehead; Nicole Edgar Fitzpatrick; Paul Youmans; Chris Borland; Kelly Sloan; Kaitlyn McKenna
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 4.  Environmental sources of radio frequency noise: potential impacts on magnetoreception.

Authors:  Jesse Granger; Steven A Cummer; Kenneth J Lohmann; Sönke Johnsen
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Can altered magnetic field affect the foraging behaviour of ants?

Authors:  Márlon César Pereira; Ingrid de Carvalho Guimarães; Daniel Acosta-Avalos; William Fernando Antonialli Junior
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Magnetic field effects in biology from the perspective of the radical pair mechanism.

Authors:  Hadi Zadeh-Haghighi; Christoph Simon
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 4.293

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.