A Hilario1, J M Sepulveda2, A Hernandez-Lain3, E Salvador4, L Koren4, R Manneh2, Y Ruano3, A Perez-Nuñez5, A Lagares5, A Ramos4. 1. Department of Radiology, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Avenida de Cordoba s/n, 28041, Madrid, Spain. amayahilario@yahoo.es. 2. Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain. 3. Department of Neuropathology, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain. 4. Department of Radiology, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Avenida de Cordoba s/n, 28041, Madrid, Spain. 5. Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In glioblastoma, tumor progression appears to be triggered by expression of VEGF, a regulator of blood vessel permeability. Bevacizumab is a monoclonal antibody that inhibits angiogenesis by clearing circulating VEGF, resulting in a decline in the contrast-enhancing tumor, which does not always correlate with treatment response. Our objectives were: (1) to evaluate whether changes in DSC perfusion MRI-derived leakage could predict survival in recurrent glioblastoma, and (2) to estimate whether leakage at baseline was related to treatment outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed DSC perfusion MRI in 24 recurrent glioblastomas treated with bevacizumab as second line chemotherapy. Leakage at baseline and changes in maximum leakage between baseline and the first follow-up after treatment were selected for quantitative analysis. Survival univariate analysis was made constructing survival curves using Kaplan-Meier method and comparing subgroups by log rank probability test. RESULTS: Leakage reduction at 8 weeks after initiation of bevacizumab treatment had a significant influence on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Median OS and PFS were 2.4 and 2.8 months longer for patients with leakage reduction at the first follow-up. Higher leakage at baseline was associated with leakage reduction after treatment. Odds ratio of treatment response was 9 for patients with maximum leakage at baseline >5. CONCLUSIONS: Leakage decrease may predict OS and PFS in recurrent glioblastomas treated with bevacizumab. Leakage reduction postulates as a potential biomarker for treatment response evaluation. Leakage at baseline seems to predict response to treatment, but was not independently associated with survival.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In glioblastoma, tumor progression appears to be triggered by expression of VEGF, a regulator of blood vessel permeability. Bevacizumab is a monoclonal antibody that inhibits angiogenesis by clearing circulating VEGF, resulting in a decline in the contrast-enhancing tumor, which does not always correlate with treatment response. Our objectives were: (1) to evaluate whether changes in DSC perfusion MRI-derived leakage could predict survival in recurrent glioblastoma, and (2) to estimate whether leakage at baseline was related to treatment outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed DSC perfusion MRI in 24 recurrent glioblastomas treated with bevacizumab as second line chemotherapy. Leakage at baseline and changes in maximum leakage between baseline and the first follow-up after treatment were selected for quantitative analysis. Survival univariate analysis was made constructing survival curves using Kaplan-Meier method and comparing subgroups by log rank probability test. RESULTS: Leakage reduction at 8 weeks after initiation of bevacizumab treatment had a significant influence on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Median OS and PFS were 2.4 and 2.8 months longer for patients with leakage reduction at the first follow-up. Higher leakage at baseline was associated with leakage reduction after treatment. Odds ratio of treatment response was 9 for patients with maximum leakage at baseline >5. CONCLUSIONS: Leakage decrease may predict OS and PFS in recurrent glioblastomas treated with bevacizumab. Leakage reduction postulates as a potential biomarker for treatment response evaluation. Leakage at baseline seems to predict response to treatment, but was not independently associated with survival.
Authors: W B Pope; A Lai; R Mehta; H J Kim; J Qiao; J R Young; X Xue; J Goldin; M S Brown; P L Nghiemphu; A Tran; T F Cloughesy Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2011-02-17 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Mark R Gilbert; James J Dignam; Terri S Armstrong; Jeffrey S Wefel; Deborah T Blumenthal; Michael A Vogelbaum; Howard Colman; Arnab Chakravarti; Stephanie Pugh; Minhee Won; Robert Jeraj; Paul D Brown; Kurt A Jaeckle; David Schiff; Volker W Stieber; David G Brachman; Maria Werner-Wasik; Ivo W Tremont-Lukats; Erik P Sulman; Kenneth D Aldape; Walter J Curran; Minesh P Mehta Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-02-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ingeborg Fischer; Clare H Cunliffe; Robert J Bollo; Shahzad Raza; David Monoky; Luis Chiriboga; Erik C Parker; John G Golfinos; Patrick J Kelly; Edmond A Knopp; Michael L Gruber; David Zagzag; Ashwatha Narayana Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2008-08-12 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Teri N Kreisl; Lyndon Kim; Kraig Moore; Paul Duic; Cheryl Royce; Irene Stroud; Nancy Garren; Megan Mackey; John A Butman; Kevin Camphausen; John Park; Paul S Albert; Howard A Fine Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-12-29 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: R A Manneh Kopp; J M Sepúlveda-Sánchez; Y Ruano; O Toldos; A Pérez Núñez; D Cantero; A Hilario; A Ramos; G de Velasco; P Sánchez-Gómez; A Hernández-Laín Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2019-03-15 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Tavarekere N Nagaraja; Rasha Elmghirbi; Stephen L Brown; Julian A Rey; Lonni Schultz; Abir Mukherjee; Glauber Cabral; Swayamprava Panda; Ian Y Lee; Malisa Sarntinoranont; Kelly A Keenan; Robert A Knight; James R Ewing Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2021-04-04 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Prativa Sahoo; Paul Frankel; Julie Ressler; Margarita Gutova; Alexander J Annala; Behnam Badie; Jana Portnow; Karen S Aboody; Massimo D'Apuzzo; Russell C Rockne Journal: Stem Cells Int Date: 2018-03-14 Impact factor: 5.443