Stephanie Thompson1, Marcello Tonelli2, Scott Klarenbach3, Anita Molzahn4. 1. Division of Nephrology, and th11@ualberta.ca. 2. Division of Nephrology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. 3. Division of Nephrology, and. 4. Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; and.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Randomized, controlled trials show that regular exercise is beneficial for patients on hemodialysis. Intradialytic exercise may have additional benefits, such as amelioration of treatment-related symptoms. However, the factors that influence the implementation of intradialytic exercise are largely unknown. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Individual semistructured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of patients on hemodialysis who had participated in a pilot randomized, controlled trial on intradialytic exercise and dialysis staff that worked in the unit during the trial. The trial took place from July to December of 2014 and enrolled 31 patients. Interviews were conducted from April to December of 2014. Interview coding followed an inductive and broad-based approach. Thematic analysis was used to group codes into common themes, first individually and then, across staff and patient interviews. RESULTS:Twenty-five patients and 11 staff were interviewed. Three themes common to both groups emerged: support, norms (expected practices) within the dialysis unit, and the role of the dialysis nurse. The support of the kinesiologist enhanced patients' confidence and sense of capability and was a key component of implementation. However, the practice of initiating exercise at the start of the shift was a barrier to staff participation. Staff focused on the technical aspects of their role in intradialytic exercise, whereas patients viewed encouragement and assistance with intradialytic exercise as the staff's role. An additional theme of no time (for staff to participate in intradialytic exercise) was influenced by its low priority in their workflow and the demands of the unit. The staff's emphasis on patients setting up their own equipment and enhanced social interaction among participants were additional themes that conveyed the unintended consequences of the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: The kinesiologist-patient interactions and staff readiness for intradialytic exercise were important factors in the implementation of intradialytic exercise. Understanding how unit workflow and the personal values of staff can influence implementation may improve the design of intradialytic exercise interventions.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Randomized, controlled trials show that regular exercise is beneficial for patients on hemodialysis. Intradialytic exercise may have additional benefits, such as amelioration of treatment-related symptoms. However, the factors that influence the implementation of intradialytic exercise are largely unknown. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Individual semistructured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of patients on hemodialysis who had participated in a pilot randomized, controlled trial on intradialytic exercise and dialysis staff that worked in the unit during the trial. The trial took place from July to December of 2014 and enrolled 31 patients. Interviews were conducted from April to December of 2014. Interview coding followed an inductive and broad-based approach. Thematic analysis was used to group codes into common themes, first individually and then, across staff and patient interviews. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients and 11 staff were interviewed. Three themes common to both groups emerged: support, norms (expected practices) within the dialysis unit, and the role of the dialysis nurse. The support of the kinesiologist enhanced patients' confidence and sense of capability and was a key component of implementation. However, the practice of initiating exercise at the start of the shift was a barrier to staff participation. Staff focused on the technical aspects of their role in intradialytic exercise, whereas patients viewed encouragement and assistance with intradialytic exercise as the staff's role. An additional theme of no time (for staff to participate in intradialytic exercise) was influenced by its low priority in their workflow and the demands of the unit. The staff's emphasis on patients setting up their own equipment and enhanced social interaction among participants were additional themes that conveyed the unintended consequences of the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: The kinesiologist-patient interactions and staff readiness for intradialytic exercise were important factors in the implementation of intradialytic exercise. Understanding how unit workflow and the personal values of staff can influence implementation may improve the design of intradialytic exercise interventions.
Authors: Laura C Plantinga; Nancy E Fink; Rachel Harrington-Levey; Frederic O Finkelstein; Nasser Hebah; Neil R Powe; Bernard G Jaar Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2010-04-29 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Antonio Alberto Lopes; Jennifer L Bragg-Gresham; Sudtida Satayathum; Keith McCullough; Trinh Pifer; David A Goodkin; Donna L Mapes; Eric W Young; Robert A Wolfe; Philip J Held; Friedrich K Port Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Fatima Warsame; Hao Ying; Christine E Haugen; Alvin G Thomas; Deidra C Crews; Tariq Shafi; Bernard Jaar; Nadia M Chu; Dorry L Segev; Mara A McAdams-DeMarco Journal: Am J Nephrol Date: 2018-09-03 Impact factor: 3.754
Authors: Gisell Castillo; Justin Presseau; Mackenzie Wilson; Charles Cook; Bonnie Field; Amit X Garg; Christopher McIntyre; Amber O Molnar; Betty Hogeterp; Michelle Thornley; Stephanie Thompson; Jennifer M MacRae; Clara Bohm Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2022-02-25 Impact factor: 7.186
Authors: Sharlene A Greenwood; Pelagia Koufaki; Jamie H Macdonald; Catherine Bulley; Sunil Bhandari; James O Burton; Indranil Dasgupta; Kenneth Farrington; Ian Ford; Philip A Kalra; Mick Kumwenda; Iain C Macdougall; Claudia-Martina Messow; Sandip Mitra; Chante Reid; Alice C Smith; Maarten W Taal; Peter C Thomson; David C Wheeler; Claire White; Magdi Yaqoob; Thomas H Mercer Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2021-06 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Rens J R Gadaen; Jeroen P Kooman; Tom Cornelis; Frank M van der Sande; Bjorn J Winkens; Natascha J H Broers Journal: Nephron Date: 2020-10-27 Impact factor: 2.847
Authors: Sarah Van Pilsum Rasmussen; Jonathan Konel; Fatima Warsame; Hao Ying; Brian Buta; Christine Haugen; Elizabeth King; Sandra DiBrito; Ravi Varadhan; Leocadio Rodríguez-Mañas; Jeremy D Walston; Dorry L Segev; Mara A McAdams-DeMarco Journal: BMC Nephrol Date: 2018-01-12 Impact factor: 2.388