Literature DB >> 27026476

Gastroschisis: epidemiology and mode of delivery, 2005-2013.

Alexander M Friedman1, Cande V Ananth2, Zainab Siddiq3, Mary E D'Alton3, Jason D Wright3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gastroschisis is a severe congenital anomaly the etiology of which is unknown. Research evidence supports attempted vaginal delivery for pregnancies complicated by gastroschisis in the absence of obstetric indications for cesarean delivery.
OBJECTIVE: The objectives of the study evaluating pregnancies complicated by gastroschisis were to determine the proportion of women undergoing planned cesarean vs attempted vaginal delivery and to provide up-to-date epidemiology on the risk factors associated with this anomaly. STUDY
DESIGN: This population-based study of US natality records from 2005 through 2013 evaluated pregnancies complicated by gastroschisis. Women were classified based on whether they attempted vaginal delivery or underwent a planned cesarean (n = 24,836,777). Obstetrical, medical, and demographic characteristics were evaluated. Multivariable log-linear regression models were developed to determine the factors associated with the mode of delivery. Factors associated with the occurrence of the anomaly were also evaluated in log-linear models.
RESULTS: Of 5985 pregnancies with gastroschisis, 63.5% (n = 3800) attempted vaginal delivery and 36.5% (n = 2185) underwent a planned cesarean delivery. The rate of attempted vaginal delivery increased from 59.7% in 2005 to 68.8% in 2013. Earlier gestational age and Hispanic ethnicity were associated with lower rates of attempted vaginal delivery. Factors associated with the occurrence of gastroschisis included young age, smoking, high educational attainment, and being married. Protective factors included chronic hypertension, black race, and obesity. The incidence of gastroschisis was 3.1 per 10,000 pregnancies and did not increase during the study period.
CONCLUSION: Attempted vaginal delivery is becoming increasingly prevalent for women with a pregnancy complicated by gastroschisis. Recommendations from the research literature findings may be diffusing into clinical practice. A significant proportion of women with this anomaly still deliver by planned cesarean, suggesting further reduction of surgical delivery for this anomaly is possible.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cesarean delivery; congenital anomaly; gastroschisis; pregnancy; vaginal delivery

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27026476      PMCID: PMC5003749          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.03.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  34 in total

1.  Validation of birth certificate data. A study of women in New Jersey's HealthStart program.

Authors:  N E Reichman; E M Hade
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.797

2.  Is vaginal delivery preferable to elective cesarean delivery in fetuses with a known ventral wall defect?

Authors:  H Y How; B J Harris; M Pietrantoni; J C Evans; S Dutton; J Khoury; T A Siddiqi
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 3.  Familial recurrence of gastroschisis: literature review and data from the population-based birth registry "Mainz Model".

Authors:  Michael Kohl; Avi Wiesel; Felix Schier
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.545

4.  The incidence of gastroschisis.

Authors:  Mark D Kilby
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-02-04

Review 5.  Development of gastroschisis: review of hypotheses, a novel hypothesis, and implications for research.

Authors:  Marcia L Feldkamp; John C Carey; Thomas W Sadler
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2007-04-01       Impact factor: 2.802

6.  Cesarean delivery among women with low-risk pregnancies: a comparison of birth certificates and hospital discharge data.

Authors:  Emily B Kahn; Cynthia J Berg; William M Callaghan
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  The effect of mode of delivery on the perinatal outcome in fetuses with abdominal wall defects.

Authors:  M Moretti; A Khoury; J Rodriquez; T Lobe; D Shaver; B Sibai
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Short interpregnancy interval and gastroschisis risk in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study.

Authors:  Kelly D Getz; Marlene T Anderka; Martha M Werler; Amy P Case
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2012-08-18

Review 9.  Elective preterm birth for fetal gastroschisis.

Authors:  Natalie H Grant; Jon Dorling; Jim G Thornton
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-06-05

10.  Prevalence and correlates of gastroschisis in 15 states, 1995 to 2005.

Authors:  Russell S Kirby; Jennifer Marshall; Jean Paul Tanner; Jason L Salemi; Marcia L Feldkamp; Lisa Marengo; Robert E Meyer; Charlotte M Druschel; Russel Rickard; James E Kucik
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 7.623

View more
  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes of Sutureless vs Sutured Closure Techniques in Gastroschisis Repair.

Authors:  Russell G Witt; Michael Zobel; Benjamin Padilla; Hanmin Lee; Tippi C MacKenzie; Lan Vu
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 14.766

2.  Outcome and management in neonates with gastroschisis in the third millennium-a single-centre observational study.

Authors:  Lotta Räsänen; Helene Engstrand Lilja
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 3.860

3.  Major birth defects in the Brazilian side of the triple border: a population-based cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Suzana de Souza; Fernando Kenji Nampo; Cezar Rangel Pestana
Journal:  Arch Public Health       Date:  2020-06-30

4.  Bioinformatic Analysis of Gene Variants from Gastroschisis Recurrence Identifies Multiple Novel Pathogenetic Pathways: Implication for the Closure of the Ventral Body Wall.

Authors:  Víctor M Salinas-Torres; Hugo L Gallardo-Blanco; Rafael A Salinas-Torres; Ricardo M Cerda-Flores; José J Lugo-Trampe; Daniel Z Villarreal-Martínez; Laura E Martínez de Villarreal
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Increasing prevalence, time trend and seasonality of gastroschisis in São Paulo state, Brazil, 2005-2016.

Authors:  Mauricio Giusti Calderon; Edige Felipe de Sousa Santos; Luiz Carlos de Abreu; Rodrigo Daminello Raimundo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Relationship between volume and outcome for gastroschisis: a systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Johannes Morche; Tim Mathes; Anja Jacobs; Lucas Wessel; Edmund A M Neugebauer; Dawid Pieper
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2020-09-02

7.  Gastroschisis and late-onset neonatal sepsis in a tertiary referral center in Southeastern Brazil.

Authors:  Juliana Zoboli Del Bigio; Ana Cristina Aoun Tannuri; Mário Cícero Falcão; Werther Brunow de Carvalho; Felipe Yu Matsushita
Journal:  J Pediatr (Rio J)       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 2.990

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.