Literature DB >> 10871475

Is vaginal delivery preferable to elective cesarean delivery in fetuses with a known ventral wall defect?

H Y How1, B J Harris, M Pietrantoni, J C Evans, S Dutton, J Khoury, T A Siddiqi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to test the hypothesis that vaginal delivery compared with elective cesarean delivery results in improved neonatal outcome in fetuses with a known isolated ventral wall defect. STUDY
DESIGN: We performed a retrospective chart review.
RESULTS: Between 1989 and 1999, we identified 102 infants with a confirmed antenatal diagnosis of an isolated ventral wall defect with either the diagnosis of an omphalocele or gastroschisis. Sixty-six infants were delivered by cesarean and 36 were delivered vaginally. There were no significant demographic differences between the study groups or between the two sites except that one center (Cincinnati) usually delivered these fetuses by cesarean whereas the other (Louisville) usually delivered such fetuses vaginally. Overall, there were a greater number of infants with gastroschisis than omphalocele (gastroschisis, n = 71; omphalocele, n = 31). After we controlled for primary versus staged closure of ventral wall defect and gestational age at delivery; the medians and interquartile ranges for cesarean and vaginal delivery were 39 (25, 63) days versus 42 (26, 75) days, respectively (P =.32), for neonatal length of stay and 13 (9, 18) days versus 13 (9, 26) days, respectively (P =.16), for days to enteral feeding. After we controlled for the size of the defect and the amount of bowel resected, the odds of primary closure given a vaginal delivery was about half that given a cesarean delivery (odds ratio, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.18-1. 69), but this was not statistically significant. There was no statistically significant difference in the rates of neonatal death (2 [3%] vs 2 [6%]; P =.61) and neonatal sepsis (2 [3%] vs 4 [11%]; P =.18) for cesarean versus vaginal delivery. Maternal length of stay after delivery was found to be 1 day less after vaginal delivery [vaginal, 2 (2, 2) days; cesarean, 3 (2, 3) days; P =.0001]. There were 5 instances of maternal complications, and all 5 pregnancies were delivered by cesarean (P =.16).
CONCLUSION: Fetuses with an antenatal diagnosis of an isolated ventral wall defect may safely be delivered vaginally, and cesarean delivery should be performed for obstetric indications only.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10871475     DOI: 10.1067/mob.2000.106852

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  10 in total

1.  Networks in Canadian paediatric surgery: Time to get connected.

Authors:  Erik D Skarsgard
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.253

2.  Using administrative data to identify indications for elective primary cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Kimberly D Gregory; Lisa M Korst; Jeffrey A Gornbein; Lawrence D Platt
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Outcomes in infants with prenatally diagnosed gastroschisis and planned preterm delivery.

Authors:  Carmen Mesas Burgos; Anna Svenningsson; Jenny Hammarqvist Vejde; Tina Granholm; Peter Conner
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 1.827

4.  Mode of delivery and mortality among neonates with gastroschisis: A population-based cohort in Texas.

Authors:  Adriana Lopez; Renata H Benjamin; Janhavi R Raut; Anushuya Ramakrishnan; Laura E Mitchell; Kuojen Tsao; Anthony Johnson; Peter H Langlois; Michael D Swartz; A J Agopian
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 3.980

5.  Infections in gastroschisis: organisms and factors.

Authors:  B A Khalil; M E Baath; C T Baillie; R R Turnock; N Taylor; H F K Van Saene; P D Losty
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 1.827

6.  Scheduled preterm delivery for gastroschisis improves postoperative outcome.

Authors:  Thomas Gelas; Daniela Gorduza; Simone Devonec; Pascal Gaucherand; Esther Downham; Olivier Claris; Rémi Dubois
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 1.827

7.  Gastroschisis: epidemiology and mode of delivery, 2005-2013.

Authors:  Alexander M Friedman; Cande V Ananth; Zainab Siddiq; Mary E D'Alton; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-03-26       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 8.  Techniques for caesarean section.

Authors:  G J Hofmeyr; M Mathai; A Shah; N Novikova
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-01-23

Review 9.  Fetal counselling for congenital malformations.

Authors:  Kokila Lakhoo
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 2.003

10.  Ductus venosus reversed flow in omphalocele: Could it be a prognostic factor for long-term neurological impairment?

Authors:  Roxana Elena Bohîlțea; Nicolae Bacalbașa; Bianca Margareta Mihai; Corina Grigoriu; Consuela-Mădălina Gheorghe; Tiberiu Augustin Georgescu; Irina Maria Vlădăreanu; Valentin Varlas
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2021 Sep-Oct
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.