| Literature DB >> 27025838 |
Danuta M Skowronski1,2, Catharine Chambers1, Suzana Sabaiduc1, Gaston De Serres3,4,5, Anne-Luise Winter6, James A Dickinson7, Mel Krajden1,2, Jonathan B Gubbay6,8, Steven J Drews9,10, Christine Martineau3, Alireza Eshaghi6, Trijntje L Kwindt1, Nathalie Bastien11, Yan Li11.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The 2014-2015 influenza season was distinguished by an epidemic of antigenically-drifted A(H3N2) viruses and vaccine components identical to 2013-2014. We report 2014-2015 vaccine effectiveness (VE) from Canada and explore contributing agent-host factors.Entities:
Keywords: antigenic drift; genomics; influenza vaccines; sentinel surveillance; vaccine effectiveness
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27025838 PMCID: PMC4901864 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciw176
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Infect Dis ISSN: 1058-4838 Impact factor: 9.079
Figure 1.Vaccine effectiveness study inclusion and exclusion criteria for the 2014–2015 season, Canadian Sentinel Practitioner Surveillance Network. aExclusions are not mutually exclusive; specimens may have >1 exclusion criterion that applies. Counts for each criterion will sum to more than the total number of specimens excluded. Abbreviations: ILI, influenza-like illness; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.
Profile of Participants Included in 2014–2015 Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Evaluation, Canadian Sentinel Practitioner Surveillance Network
| Characteristic | Overall, n (%) | Distribution by Case | Vaccination Coverage Within Strata, n (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cases | Controls | Vaccinated | ||||
| N (%) | 1930 | 815 (42) | 1115 (58) | 684 (35) | ||
| Age group (y) | .12 | <.01 | ||||
| 1–8 | 224 (12) | 88 (11) | 136 (12) | 49 (22) | ||
| 9–19 | 242 (13) | 111 (14) | 131 (12) | 41 (17) | ||
| 20–49 | 774 (40) | 304 (37) | 470 (42) | 216 (28) | ||
| 50–64 | 438 (23) | 199 (24) | 239 (21) | 185 (42) | ||
| ≥65 | 252 (13) | 113 (14) | 139 (12) | 193 (77) | ||
| Median (range) | 39 (1–103) | 40 (1–103) | 38 (1–94) | .07 | … | |
| Sex | .01 | <.01 | ||||
| Female | 1182 (61) | 472 (58) | 710 (64) | 449 (38) | ||
| Male | 748 (39) | 343 (42) | 405 (36) | 235 (31) | ||
| Comorbidityb | .43 | <.01 | ||||
| No | 1489 (77) | 636 (78) | 853 (77) | 436 (29) | ||
| Yes | 441 (23) | 179 (22) | 262 (24) | 248 (56) | ||
| Province | <.01 | <.01 | ||||
| Alberta | 560 (29) | 220 (27) | 340 (30) | 232 (41) | ||
| British Columbia | 292 (15) | 99 (12) | 193 (17) | 91 (31) | ||
| Ontario | 657 (34) | 273 (34) | 384 (34) | 270 (41) | ||
| Quebec | 421 (22) | 223 (27) | 198 (18) | 91 (22) | ||
| Collection interval (d) | <.01 | .25 | ||||
| ≤4 | 1432 (74) | 654 (80) | 778 (70) | 497 (35) | ||
| 5–7 | 498 (26) | 161 (20) | 337 (30) | 187 (38) | ||
| Median (range) | 3 (0–7) | 3 (0–7) | 3 (0–7) | <.01 | … | |
| Calendar timec | <.01 | <.01 | ||||
| November | 107 (6) | 22 (3) | 85 (8) | 23 (22) | ||
| December | 473 (25) | 262 (32) | 211 (19) | 171 (36) | ||
| January | 589 (31) | 252 (31) | 337 (30) | 218 (37) | ||
| February | 351 (18) | 117 (14) | 234 (21) | 143 (41) | ||
| March | 269 (14) | 115 (14) | 154 (14) | 89 (33) | ||
| April | 141 (7) | 47 (6) | 94 (8) | 40 (28) | ||
| Received 2014–2015 influenza vaccine | ||||||
| Any vaccinationd | 734/1980 (37) | 300/836 (36) | 434/1144 (38) | .35 | … | |
| ≥2 wk before onset | 684 (35) | 279 (34) | 405 (36) | .34 | … | |
| LAIV overalle | 33/391 (8) | 14/162 (9) | 19/229 (8) | .90 | … | |
| LAIV childrenf | 31/64 (48) | 13/34 (38) | 18/30 (60) | .08 | ||
| Adjuvantedg | 37/108 (34) | 14/45 (31) | 23/63 (37) | .56 | … | |
| Prior vaccination history | ||||||
| 2013–2014 vaccineh | 758/1801 (42) | 330/779 (42) | 428/1022 (42) | .84 | 564/758 (74) | <.01 |
| 2012–2013 vaccinei | 733/1719 (43) | 333/757 (44) | 400/962 (42) | .32 | 530/733 (72) | <.01 |
Abbreviation: LAIV, live attenuated influenza vaccine.
a Differences between cases and controls and vaccinated and unvaccinated participants were compared using the χ2 test or Wilcoxon rank sum test.
b Chronic comorbidities that place individuals at higher risk of serious complications from influenza, as defined by Canada's National Advisory Committee on Immunization, include heart, pulmonary, renal, metabolic, blood, cancer, and immune comprising conditions or those that compromise management of respiratory secretions, or morbid obesity. Questionnaire answered “yes,” “no,” or “unknown” without specifying comorbidity.
c Based on month of specimen collection. Missing collection dates were imputed as the laboratory accession date minus 2 days, which is the average time period between collection date and laboratory accession date for records with complete data for both fields.
d Participants who received seasonal 2014–2015 influenza vaccine <2 weeks before influenza-like illness (ILI) onset or for whom vaccination timing was unknown were excluded from the primary analysis. They were included for assessing “any” immunization, regardless of timing, for comparison with other sources of vaccination coverage.
e Among participants aged 2–59 years who received 2014–2015 influenza vaccine ≥2 weeks before ILI onset and had complete data for type of vaccine (includes 2 adult recipients).
f Among participants aged 2–17 years who received 2014–2015 influenza vaccine ≥2 weeks before ILI onset and had complete data for type of vaccine.
g Among participants aged ≥65 years who received 2014–2015 influenza vaccine ≥2 weeks before ILI onset and had complete data for adjuvanted vaccine receipt.
h Children aged <2 years in 2014–2015 were excluded from 2013–2014 vaccine uptake analysis as they may not have been eligible for vaccination during the fall 2013 immunization campaign.
i Children aged <3 years in 2014–2015 were excluded from 2012–2013 vaccine uptake analysis as they may not have been eligible for vaccination during the fall 2012 immunization campaign.
Influenza Virus Characterization by Type and Subtype, 2014–2015 Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Evaluation, Canadian Sentinel Practitioner Surveillance Network
| Specimen | Alberta, n (%) | British Columbia, n (%) | Ontario, n (%) | Quebec, n (%) | Overall, n (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 560 | 292 | 657 | 421 | 1930 |
| Influenza negative | 340 (61) | 193 (66) | 384 (58) | 198 (47) | 1115 (58) |
| Influenza positive | 220 (39) | 99 (34) | 273 (42) | 223 (53) | 815 (42) |
| Influenza Aa | 165 (75) | 84 (85) | 215 (79) | 126 (57) | 590 (72) |
| A(H3N2) | 161 (98) | 81 (96) | 206 (96) | 122 (97) | 570 (97) |
| A(H1N1)pdm09 | 2 (1) | 1 (1) | 3 (1) | 1 (1) | 7 (1) |
| Subtype unknown | 2 (1) | 2 (2) | 6 (3) | 3 (2) | 13 (2) |
| Influenza Ba | 55 (25) | 15 (15) | 58 (21) | 98 (44) | 226 (28) |
| Yamagata lineage | 43 (78) | 13 (87) | 50 (86) | 87 (89) | 193 (85) |
| Victoria lineage | 1 (2) | 1 (7) | 2 (3) | 2 (2) | 6 (3) |
| Lineage unknown | 11 (20) | 1 (7) | 6 (10) | 9 (9) | 27 (12) |
| Antigenic characterizationb | |||||
| Influenza A(H3N2)c,d | 105/161 (65) | 39/81 (48) | 25/206 (12) | 100/122 (82) | 269/570 (47) |
| A/Switzerland/9715293/2013-likee,f,g | 24 (23) | 18 (46) | 7 (28) | 1 (1) | 50 (19) |
| Insufficient titer to run HI assayh | 81 (77) | 21 (54) | 18 (72) | 99 (99) | 219 (81) |
| Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 | 0/2 (0) | 1/1 (100) | 3/3 (100) | 1/1 (100) | 5/7 (71) |
| A/California/7/2009-likei,j | 0 | 1 (100) | 3 (100) | 1 (100) | 5 (100) |
| Influenza Bk | 26/55 (47) | 12/15 (80) | 20/58 (34) | 83/98 (85) | 141/226 (62) |
| B/Massachusetts/2/2012-likel | 25 (96) | 12 (100) | 19 (95) | 78 (94) | 134 (95) |
| B/Brisbane/60/2008-likem | 1 (4) | 0 | 1 (5) | 2 (2) | 4 (3) |
| Insufficient titer to run HI assay | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 (2) | 2 (1) |
| Genetic characterizationn | |||||
| Influenza A(H3N2) | 161 (100) | 81 (100) | 206 (100) | 122 (100) | 570 (100) |
| Clade 3C.2a | 139 (86) | 43 (53) | 123 (60) | 104 (85) | 409 (72) |
| Clade 3C.3 | 1 (1) | 1 (1) | 6 (3) | 1 (1) | 9 (2) |
| Clade 3C.3a | 0 | 1 (1) | 2 (1) | 0 | 3 (1) |
| Clade 3C.3b | 6 (4) | 26 (32) | 7 (3) | 0 | 39 (7) |
| Sequencing attempted but failed | 15 (9) | 10 (12) | 68 (33) | 17 (14) | 110 (19) |
| Influenza B(Yamagata) lineage | 43 (100) | 13 (100) | 50 (100) | 87 (100) | 193 (100) |
| Clade 3 (B/Wisconsin/1/2010-like) | 39 (91) | 13 (100) | 37 (74) | 76 (87) | 165 (85) |
| Sequencing attempted but failed | 4 (9) | 0 | 13 (26) | 11 (13) | 28 (15) |
Abbreviation: HI, hemagglutination inhibition.
a One participant coinfected with influenza A(H3N2) and influenza B has been included in totals for both influenza A and B.
b Antigenic characterization of viruses with sufficient hemagglutination titer was by HI assay.
c Culture isolation was attempted on all viruses detected in British Columbia, Alberta, and Quebec where 244/364 (67%) A(H3N2) detections could be successfully cultivated. In Ontario, 25/206 (12%) A(H3N2) detections were cultivated owing to a shortage of reagents and virus growth issues.
d Includes 234 clade 3C.2a, 25 clade 3C.3b, 4 clade 3C.3, and 2 clade 3C.3a viruses; 4 with unknown clade.
e Ferret antisera to cell-passaged reference viruses provided by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
f Of the 50 A(H3N2) viruses with sufficient hemagglutination titer, all 50 (100%) had ≤4-fold reduction to cell-passaged A/Switzerland/9715293/2013 virus. Of the 49/50 A/Switzerland/9715293/2013-like viruses with sequencing results, 31 (63%) were clade 3C.2a, 15 (31%) were clade 3C.3b, 2 (4%) were clade 3C.3a, and 1 (2%) was clade 3C.3; 1 could not be sequenced.
g A subset of A(H3N2) viruses with sufficient hemagglutination titer were additionally compared against egg-passaged reference virus based on ferret antisera provided by the CDC. Of the 36 A(H3N2) viruses with sufficient titer, 35 (97%) had ≤4-fold reduction to egg-passaged A/Switzerland/9715293/2013 virus and 1 (3%; clade 3C.3b) had 8-fold reduction. Of the 35/36 A/Switzerland/9715293/2013-like viruses with sequencing results, 25 (71%) were clade 3C.2a, 7 (20%) were clade 3C.3b, 2 (6%) were clade 3C.3a, and 1 (3%) was clade 3C.3; 1 could not be sequenced.
h Of the 216/219 viruses with insufficient titer to run HI assay and with sequencing results, 203 were clade 3C.2a, 10 were clade 3C.3b, and 3 were clade 3C.3.
i Ferret antisera produced to the egg-passaged reference virus at Canada's reference laboratory (the National Microbiology Laboratory [NML]).
j Of the 5 A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses characterized by HI assay, all had reductions ≤4-fold to a cell-passaged A/California/07/2009 virus.
k Culture isolation was attempted on all viruses detected in British Columbia, Alberta, and Quebec where 121/168 (72%) influenza B detections could be successfully cultivated. In Ontario, 20/58 (34%) influenza B detections were cultivated owing to a shortage of reagents and virus growth issues.
l Yamagata lineage, clade 2. Ferret antisera to cell-passaged reference virus provided by the CDC. Of the 135 B(Yamagata) lineage viruses characterized, 134 (99%) had ≤4-fold reduction and 1 (1%; not displayed) had 8-fold reduction to cell-passaged B/Massachusetts/02/2012 (clade 2) virus.
m Victoria lineage. Ferret antisera to the egg-passaged reference virus provided by the CDC.
n Genetic clade-level characterization based on sequencing of original patient specimen (provincial reference labs) or cultured isolate (NML).
Vaccine Effectiveness Estimates and 95% Confidence Intervals by Influenza Type, Subtype/Lineage, and Clade, 2014–2015 Season, Canadian Sentinel Practitioner Surveillance Network
| Model | Any Influenza | Any Influenza A | Any A(H3N2) | A(H3N2) | A(H3N2) | Any Influenza B | Any B(Yamagata) | B(Yamagata) Clade 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 1930 | 1705 | 1685 | 1524 | 1154 | 1341 | 1308 | 1280 |
| n case (% vac) | 815 (34) | 590 (39) | 570 (39) | 409 (40) | 39 (18) | 226 (23) | 193 (24) | 165 (23) |
| n control (% vac) | 1115 (36) | 1115 (36) | 1115 (36) | 1115 (36) | 1115 (36) | 1115 (36) | 1115 (36) | 1115 (36) |
| Primary analysis | ||||||||
| Unadjusted | 9 (−10–24) | −10 (−36–10) | −13 (−40–8) | −15 (−45–9) | 62 (12–83) | 49 (29–63) | 45 (22–61) | 48 (23–64) |
| Age groupa | 15 (−5–30) | −5 (−31–16) | −8 (−35–14) | −7 (−38–17) | 57 (−3–82) | 54 (33–68) | 50 (28–66) | 50 (25–67) |
| Sex (female/male) | 7 (−12–23) | −13 (−39–8) | −16 (−43–6) | −18 (−49–7) | 60 (8–83) | 49 (29–64) | 45 (22–61) | 47 (23–64) |
| Comorbidity (no/yes) | 7 (−12–24) | −10 (−36–11) | −13 (−40–8) | −13 (−44–11) | 61 (9–83) | 46 (24–62) | 43 (18–60) | 45 (18–63) |
| Province (Alberta, British Columbia, Ontario, Quebec) | 3 (−17–20) | −12 (−38–9) | −15 (−42–6) | −20 (−52–5) | NRb | 39 (14–57) | 33 (3–54) | 36 (5–57) |
| Collection interval (≤4/5–7 d) | 8 (−12–24) | −12 (−38–9) | −15 (−42–6) | −17 (−48–8) | 60 (10–83) | 48 (28–63) | 45 (21–61) | 47 (22–64) |
| Calendar timec | 12 (−6–28) | −10 (−37–11) | −14 (−43–8) | −15 (−47–11) | 62 (12–83) | 53 (32–67) | 50 (27–65) | 51 (27–67) |
| Age, sex, comorbidity, province, interval, timec | 9 (−14–27) | −13 (−45–12) | −17 (−50–9) | −13 (−51–15) | 52 (−17–80)d | 45 (18–64) | 42 (10–62) | 42 (8–63) |
| Stratified analysis, by age group | ||||||||
| Main effects and interaction onlye | 2 (−55–39) | −31 (−111–19) | −34 (−117–17) | −31 (−123–23) | NRb | 82 (25–96) | 78 (7–95) | 73 (−15–94) |
| Adjustedf | −5 (−71–35) | −57 (−167–7) | −64 (−180–3) | −56 (−182–14) | NRb | 84 (29–96) | 80 (11–96) | 76 (−10–95) |
| Main effects and interaction onlye | 14 (−10–32) | −4 (−36–20) | −8 (−42–18) | −7 (−46–22) | NRb | 47 (20–65) | 45 (15–64) | 46 (15–66) |
| Adjustedf | 7 (−20–28) | −8 (−45–20) | −13 (−52–17) | −10 (−57–22) | NRb | 33 (−6–57) | 29 (−16–56) | 30 (−17–58) |
| ≥ | ||||||||
| Main effects and interaction onlye | 20 (−43–56) | 17 (−54–56) | 19 (−52–56) | 20 (−54–59) | NRb | 31 (−93–75) | 23 (−131–74) | 31 (−135–80) |
| Adjustedf | 20 (−47–57) | 15 (−67–57) | 17 (−64–58) | 24 (−59–64) | NRb | 19 (−160–75) | 17 (−187–76) | 25 (−194–81) |
| Stratified analysis, by comorbidity | ||||||||
| Main effects and interaction onlyg | 8 (−15–27) | −15 (−47–10) | −18 (−51–8) | −15 (−53–13) | NRb | 52 (28–68) | 50 (23–68) | 50 (21–69) |
| Adjustedh | 6 (−20–27) | −24 (−64–6) | −28 (−69–4) | −23 (−70–11) | NRb | 48 (17–67) | 45 (11–67) | 44 (6–67) |
| Main effects and interaction onlyg | 6 (−38–36) | 2 (−48–35) | −2 (−54–33) | −8 (−71–32) | NRb | 24 (−50–62) | 15 (−75–58) | 24 (−65–65) |
| Adjustedh | 16 (−28–44) | 14 (−36–46) | 11 (−43–44) | 11 (−50–48) | NRb | 37 (−37–71) | 29 (−61–69) | 32 (−63–72) |
Abbreviations: % vac, percentage vaccinated; NR, not reported.
a Age group categories: 1–8, 9–19, 20–49, 50–64, ≥65 years.
b Model did not converge and/or sample sizes do not support reliable estimation.
c Calendar time was modeled by week of specimen collection using cubic B-spline functions with 3 equally spaced knots.
d Adjusted model for influenza A(H3N2) clade 3C.3b outcome not adjusted for province due to small number of cases within strata.
e Adjusted for age group (1–19, 20–64, ≥65 years) and vaccine × age group interaction.
f Adjusted for age group (1–19, 20–64, ≥65 years), sex, comorbidity, province, collection interval, calendar time (spline), and vaccine × age group interaction.
g Adjusted for comorbidity and vaccine × comorbidity interaction.
h Adjusted for age group, sex, comorbidity, province, collection interval, calendar time (spline), and vaccine × comorbidity interaction.
Figure 2.Effect of prior 2012–2013 and/or 2013–2014 season influenza vaccine receipt on current 2014–2015 influenza vaccine effectiveness for influenza A(H3N2). Analyses are based on the same exclusion criteria as primary analysis, adjusted for age group (<9, 9–19, 20–49, 50–64, ≥65 years), sex, comorbidity, province, collection interval, and calendar time (spline). Calendar time was modeled by week of specimen collection using cubic B-spline functions with 3 equally spaced knots. A, The effect of prior 2013–2014 vaccine receipt in participants aged ≥2 years in 2014–2015 and with complete data for 2013–2014 and 2014–2015 influenza vaccine receipt. B, The effect of prior 2013–2014 and/or 2012–2013 vaccine receipt in participants aged ≥3 years in 2014–2015 and those with complete data for 2012–2013, 2013–2014, and 2014–2015 influenza vaccine receipt. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; VE, vaccine effectiveness.
Figure 3.Effect of prior 2012–2013 and/or 2013–2014 season influenza vaccine receipt on current 2014–2015 influenza vaccine effectiveness for influenza B(Yamagata). Analyses are based on the same exclusion criteria as primary analysis, adjusted for age group (<9, 9–19, 20–49, 50–64, ≥65 years), sex, comorbidity, province, collection interval, and calendar time (spline). Calendar time was modeled by week of specimen collection using cubic B-spline functions with 3 equally spaced knots. A, The effect of prior 2013–2014 vaccine receipt in participants aged ≥2 years in 2014–2015 and with complete data for 2013–2014 and 2014–2015 influenza vaccine receipt. B, The effect of prior 2013–2014 and/or 2012–2013 vaccine receipt in participants aged ≥3 years in 2014–2015 and those with complete data for 2012–2013, 2013–2014, and 2014–2015 influenza vaccine receipt. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; VE, vaccine effectiveness.
Figure 4.Crystal structure of hemagglutinin (HA) of circulating A(H3N2) clade 3C.2a and clade 3C.3b viruses relative to the 2014–2015 egg-adapted high-growth reassortant (HGR) vaccine strain. Three-dimensional structural model shows antigenic site substitutions in the HA1 of representative sentinel influenza A(H3N2) viruses compared with the 2014–2015 egg-adapted A/Texas/50/2012-like (clade 3C.1) HGR vaccine strain (X-223A) for (A) clade 3C.2a and (B) clade 3C.3b. The homology models of HA were generated using the SWISS-MODEL web-based automated modeling server [34]. The final images of the HA structures were generated using Pymol (Schrödinger, LLC) [35]. The trimeric HA protein of A(H3N2) was constructed using the A/Victoria/361/2011 human A(H3N2) virus (PDB accession number 4WE8.1) with 97% identity to circulating strains. Antigenic sites (A–E) are shown in pastel colors. Substitutions in antigenic sites are labelled, and those identifying clade designations are shown in cyan, those arising from egg passage and/or in the HGR are shown in red, and other substitutions in sentinel viruses are shown in darker shading of the corresponding antigenic site color. Mutations at pivotal antigenic site B positions 159 (a cluster-transition position) and 160 (associated with a potential gain of glycosylation) are indicated with a red star, present in clade 3C.2a viruses but absent from clade 3C.3b viruses relative to X-223A. (Panel A republished with modifications on permission of Oxford University Press from Skowronski DM et al [11], J Infect Dis 2015; 212(5).)