| Literature DB >> 27025192 |
Thomas Cudahy1, Mike Caccetta1, Matilda Thomas2, Robert Hewson1,3, Michael Abrams4, Masatane Kato5, Osamu Kashimura5, Yoshiki Ninomiya6, Yasushi Yamaguchi7, Simon Collings8, Carsten Laukamp1, Cindy Ong1, Ian Lau1, Andrew Rodger1, Joanne Chia8, Peter Warren9, Robert Woodcock10, Ryan Fraser1, Terry Rankine1, Josh Vote1, Patrice de Caritat2,11, Pauline English2, Dave Meyer12, Chris Doescher12, Bihong Fu13, Pilong Shi13, Ross Mitchell14.
Abstract
The Earth's surface comprises minerals diagnostic of weathering, deposition and erosion. The first continental-scale mineral maps generated from an imaging satellite with spectral bands designed to measure clays, quartz and other minerals were released in 2012 for Australia. Here we show how these satellite mineral maps improve our understanding of weathering, erosional and depositional processes in the context of changing weather, climate and tectonics. The clay composition map shows how kaolinite has developed over tectonically stable continental crust in response to deep weathering during northwardly migrating tropical conditions from 45 to 10 Ma. The same clay composition map, in combination with one sensitive to water content, enables the discrimination of illite from montmorillonite clays that typically develop in large depositional environments over thin (sinking) continental crust such as the Lake Eyre Basin. Cutting across these clay patterns are sandy deserts that developed <10 Ma and are well mapped using another satellite product sensitive to the particle size of silicate minerals. This product can also be used to measure temporal gains/losses of surface clay caused by periodic wind erosion (dust) and rainfall inundation (flood) events. The accuracy and information content of these satellite mineral maps are validated using published data.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27025192 PMCID: PMC4812253 DOI: 10.1038/srep23702
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1ASTER clay maps with associated validation data.
(a) ASTER Clay Composition (CC) map (background) overlain by: (i) NGSA field sample reflectance data convolved and processed to ASTER CC response; (ii) river sampling points35; (iii) approximate boundary of thin crust52; and (iv) selected localities, namely: A – Yilgarn Craton, B – Musgrave Block, C – Gawler Block, D – Kimberley Block, E – Cape York Penisula, F – Lake Eyre Basin, G – Murray-Darling Basin, H – Eucla Basin, I – Canning Basin, J – Pilbara Block, K – Mount Isa Block. (b) ASTER Clay Content (CI) map (background) overlain by: (i) NGSA field sample data for % clay and CIA [Al/(Al + Ca + Mg + K + Na)]3334; (ii) isolines of rainfall averages for 1996–200547; and (iii) selected localities, namely: L – Lake Eyre Basin and M – Gascoyne. Figure created using the following software: ENVI (4.3, http://www.exelisvis.com/ProductsServices/ENVIProducts.aspx), ARCMAP (10.2.2, http://www.esri.com/software/arcgis/arcgis-for-desktop), EXCEL 2013 (http://www.microsoftstore.com/store) and COREL Photopaint (7, http://www.corel.com/au).
Figure 2ASTER quartz sand and clay-water maps with associated validation data.
(a) ASTER Silica Index map overlain by: (i) field sample NGSA data for Si (geochemistry) and % sand (particle size)3334; (ii) limit of arid zone1; and (iii) sandy deserts, namely: N – Great Sandy, O – Tanami, P – Little Sandy, Q – Gibson, R – Simpson, S – Sturt Stony, T – Strzelecki, U – Great Victoria and V – northwest dune-fields; and (iv) detailed study area of Fig. 3a (white rectangle). (b) ASTER Clay-Water Index (CWI) map (background) overlain by: (i) field sample NGSA data for LOI and % clay3334; (ii) extent of the Lake Eyre drainage basin (red polygon); and (iii) selected localities referred to in the text. Figure created using the following software: ENVI (4.3, http://www.exelisvis.com/ProductsServices/ENVIProducts.aspx), ARCMAP (10.2.2, http://www.esri.com/software/arcgis/arcgis-for-desktop), EXCEL 2013 (http://www.microsoftstore.com) and COREL Photopaint (7, http://www.corel.com/au).
Least squares regression results for selected NGSA sample data (n = 165) where significant correlation is considered at the (i) 90% confidence interval to be where R2 > 0.33; (ii) 95% confidence interval to be where R2 > 0.39; and (iii) 99% confidence interval to be where R2 > 0.46.
| LOI | % sand | % clay | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASTER Al-clay composition | 0.34 | 0.32 | |
| ASTER Al-clay content | 0.04 | 0.10 | |
| ASTER water-clay | 0.21 | 0.45 | |
| ASTER Silica Index | 0.74 | ||
| Al | 0.32 | 0.40 | |
| Si | 0.53 | ||
| 0.05 | 0.03 | ||
| K | 0.03 | 0.01 | |
| Th | 0.05 | 0.05 | |
| U | 0.12 | 0.02 |
Inverse relationships are underlined. *Transformed to the power 0.32 to generate a normal distribution of data. Sand size is >20 μm but less than 2000 μm and clay size is <2 μm.
Clay composition results measured from XRD analysis of suspended river sediments35 and their respective river catchments measured using the ASTER CC.
| River system | River sample point latitude | River sample point longitude | Chlorite (%) | Montmorillonite (%) | Illite (%) | Kaolin (%) | Montmorillonite + illite (%) | Number of ASTER pixels in catchment | Mean of ASTER CC for catchment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adelaide River | a | 12°39.62′S | 131°20.16′E | 11 | 19 | 19 | 51 | 38 | 1047600 | 1.073 |
| Ashburton River | b | 22°32.63′S | 115°29.92′E | 7 | 6 | 50 | 37 | 56 | 58414500 | 1.07 |
| Burdekin River | c | 19°37.79′S | 147°24.48′E | 7 | 17 | 23 | 53 | 40 | 22234500 | 1.07 |
| Cooper Creek | d | 27°44.83′S | 140°44.17′E | 10 | 25 | 22 | 43 | 47 | 141275700 | 1.077 |
| De Grey River | e | 20°18.71′S | 119°15.35′E | 20 | 12 | 30 | 38 | 42 | 22589100 | 1.093 |
| East Alligator River | f | 12°25.51′S | 132°57.92′E | 10 | 24 | 15 | 51 | 39 | 2022300 | 1.03 |
| Fitzroy River WA | g | 17°43.65′S | 123°38.45′E | 11 | 18 | 36 | 35 | 54 | 31125600 | 1.074 |
| Fitzroy River QLD | h | 23°22.82′S | 150°31.23′E | 7 | 37 | 18 | 38 | 55 | 39049200 | 1.075 |
| Fortescue River | i | 21°17.60′S | 116°08.62′E | 22 | 9 | 25 | 44 | 34 | 19401300 | 1.0625 |
| Gascoyne River | j | 24°49.74′S | 113°46.20′E | 7 | 5 | 41 | 47 | 46 | 76700700 | 1.069 |
| Jardine River | k | 11°06.29′S | 142°17.00′E | 9 | 0 | 2 | 89 | 2 | 56700 | 0.97 |
| Katherine River | l | 14°27.72′S | 132°15.52′E | 9 | 17 | 22 | 52 | 39 | 1881900 | 1.024 |
| Mangrove Creek, WA | m | 21°57.94′S | 113°56.59′E | 12 | 3 | 54 | 31 | 57 | 1573200 | 1.1 |
| Murchison River | n | 27°49.68′S | 114°41.38′E | 11 | 2 | 34 | 53 | 36 | 90604800 | 1.045 |
| Murray River Mildura | o | 34°10.94′S | 142°10.34′E | 5 | 15 | 52 | 28 | 67 | 44934300 | 1.105 |
| Murray River Swan | p | 34°34.04′S | 139°35.67′E | 3 | 24 | 41 | 32 | 65 | 512198100 | 1.075 |
| Murrumbidgee River | q | 34°38.79′S | 143°33.94′E | 3 | 24 | 38 | 35 | 62 | 34847100 | 1.11 |
| Normanby River | r | 14°54.68′S | 144°12.76′E | 8 | 6 | 36 | 50 | 42 | 743400 | 1.044 |
| Ord River | s | 15°41.38′S | 128°41.29′E | 10 | 29 | 34 | 27 | 63 | 17855100 | 1.067 |
| South Alligator River | t | 12°39.46′S | 132°30.34′E | 9 | 22 | 19 | 50 | 41 | 1371600 | 1.025 |
| Victoria River | u | 15°36.61′S | 130°24.07′E | 5 | 42 | 21 | 32 | 63 | 17109000 | 1.072 |
| <0.01 | 0.05 | 0.46 | 0.64 | |||||||
Figure 3Temporal variations in ASTER SI over Cooper Creek, Lake Eyre basin.
(a) Detail of the published ASTER SI mosaic30 (Fig. 2a; white rectangle) for an area of Cooper Creek (white line) which drains into Lake Eyre. Colour scheme is the same as Fig. 2a. Image is overlain by: (i) ASTER satellite track boundaries (grey lines) of three dates of ASTER images (dates shown); (ii) evidence for a dust trail “Y”; (iii) Etadunna Station, which is the site for ground meteorological observations; (iv) detailed area (black rectangle) for temporal study of ASTER SI. (b) Stacked histograms of ASTER SI data (offset and coloured for clarity) for eight dates of imagery from 2000 to 2008 for the detailed study area. Also shown are: (i) periods of intense rainfall; and (ii) SI positions for clay and sand size material, which shows an apparent increase in sand size material from 2006 to 2008. (c–i) changes in SI response for consecutive dates of ASTER imagery from 2000 to 2008 for the detailed study area (~9 by 13 km) calculated as a ratio of the following image date. Warmer response equals a relative loss of clay or gain of sand whereas a cooler response represents a relative gain of clay or loss of sand compared to the previous year/image. Drainage lows, including ephemeral lakes, are shown by black dotted lines. Aeolian sand dunes are show by a magenta dashed lines and rocky surfaces are shown by a yellow solid lines. Figure created using the following software: ENVI (4.3, http://www.exelisvis.com/ProductsServices/ENVIProducts.aspx), ARCMAP (10.2.2, http://www.esri.com/software/arcgis/arcgis-for-desktop), EXCEL (2013, http://www.microsoftstore.com) and COREL Photopaint (V7, http://www.corel.com/au).