Literature DB >> 22178529

New soil composition data for Europe and Australia: demonstrating comparability, identifying continental-scale processes and learning lessons for global geochemical mapping.

Clemens Reimann1, Patrice de Caritat.   

Abstract

New geochemical data from two continental-scale soil surveys in Europe and Australia are compared. Internal project standards were exchanged to assess comparability of analytical results. The total concentration of 26 oxides/elements (Al2O3, As, Ba, CaO, Ce, Co, Cr, Fe2O3, Ga, K2O, MgO, MnO, Na2O, Nb, Ni, P2O5, Pb, Rb, SiO2, Sr, Th, TiO2, V, Y, Zn, and Zr), Loss On Ignition (LOI) and pH are demonstrated to be comparable. Additionally, directly comparable data for 14 elements in an aqua regia extraction (Ag, As, Bi, Cd, Ce, Co, Cs, Cu, Fe, La, Li, Mn, Mo, and Pb) are provided for both continents. Median soil compositions are close, though generally Australian soils are depleted in all elements with the exception of SiO2 and Zr. This is interpreted to reflect the generally longer and, in places, more intense weathering in Australia. Calculation of the Chemical Index of Alteration (CIA) gives a median value of 72% for Australia compared to 60% for Europe. Element concentrations vary over 3 (and up to 5) orders of magnitude. Several elements (total As and Ni; aqua regia As, Co, Bi, Li, Pb) have a lower element concentration by a factor of 2-3 in the soils of northern Europe compared to southern Europe. The break in concentration coincides with the maximum extent of the last glaciation. The younger soils of northern Europe are more similar to the Australian soils than the older soils from southern Europe. In Australia, the central region with especially high SiO2 concentrations is commonly depleted in many elements. The new data define the natural background variation for two continents on both hemispheres based on real data. Judging from the experience of these two continental surveys, it can be concluded that analytical quality is the key requirement for the success of global geochemical mapping.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22178529     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.11.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  5 in total

1.  Multivariate spatial analyses of the distribution and origin of trace and major elements in soils surrounding a secondary lead smelter.

Authors:  Arnaud R Schneider; Xavier Morvan; Nicolas P A Saby; Benjamin Cancès; Marie Ponthieu; Maxime Gommeaux; Béatrice Marin
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  Remediation of soil cadmium pollution by biomineralization using microbial-induced precipitation: a review.

Authors:  Yunting Zheng; Chunqiao Xiao; Ruan Chi
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  A correlation study between multiple sclerosis and type 1 diabetes incidences and geochemical data in Europe.

Authors:  Paolo Valera; Patrizia Zavattari; Stefano Albanese; Domenico Cicchella; Enrico Dinelli; Annamaria Lima; Benedetto De Vivo
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 4.609

4.  Total and bioaccessible heavy metals in cabbage from major producing cities in Southwest China: health risk assessment and cytotoxicity.

Authors:  Mengying Li; Yishu Qin; Chengchen Wang; Kun Wang; Zhihua Deng; Wumei Xu; Ping Xiang; Lena Q Ma
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 3.361

5.  Satellite-derived mineral mapping and monitoring of weathering, deposition and erosion.

Authors:  Thomas Cudahy; Mike Caccetta; Matilda Thomas; Robert Hewson; Michael Abrams; Masatane Kato; Osamu Kashimura; Yoshiki Ninomiya; Yasushi Yamaguchi; Simon Collings; Carsten Laukamp; Cindy Ong; Ian Lau; Andrew Rodger; Joanne Chia; Peter Warren; Robert Woodcock; Ryan Fraser; Terry Rankine; Josh Vote; Patrice de Caritat; Pauline English; Dave Meyer; Chris Doescher; Bihong Fu; Pilong Shi; Ross Mitchell
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.