INTRODUCTION: We report our experience with extended right hemicolectomy (ERH) and left hemicolectomy (LH) for the treatment of cancers located between the distal transverse and the proximal descending colon, and compare postoperative morbidity, mortality, pathological results and survival for the two techniques. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of a single institution series over ten years. Patients who underwent different operations, had benign disease or received palliative resections were excluded. Data collected were patient demographics, type and duration of surgery, tumour site, postoperative complications and histology results. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients were analysed (64 ERHs, 34 LHs). ERH was conducted using an open approach in 93.8% of cases compared with 73.5% for LH. The anastomotic leak rate was similar for both groups (ERH: 6.3%, LH: 5.9%). This was also the case for other postoperative complications, mortality (ERH: 1.6%, LH: 2.9%) and overall survival (ERH: 50.4 months, LH: 51.8 months). All but one patient in the ERH cohort had clear surgical margins. Nodal evaluation for staging was adequate in 78.1% of ERH cases and 58.8% of LH cases. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, both ERH and LH are adequate for tumours located between the distal transverse and the proximal descending colon.
INTRODUCTION: We report our experience with extended right hemicolectomy (ERH) and left hemicolectomy (LH) for the treatment of cancers located between the distal transverse and the proximal descending colon, and compare postoperative morbidity, mortality, pathological results and survival for the two techniques. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of a single institution series over ten years. Patients who underwent different operations, had benign disease or received palliative resections were excluded. Data collected were patient demographics, type and duration of surgery, tumour site, postoperative complications and histology results. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients were analysed (64 ERHs, 34 LHs). ERH was conducted using an open approach in 93.8% of cases compared with 73.5% for LH. The anastomotic leak rate was similar for both groups (ERH: 6.3%, LH: 5.9%). This was also the case for other postoperative complications, mortality (ERH: 1.6%, LH: 2.9%) and overall survival (ERH: 50.4 months, LH: 51.8 months). All but one patient in the ERH cohort had clear surgical margins. Nodal evaluation for staging was adequate in 78.1% of ERH cases and 58.8% of LH cases. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, both ERH and LH are adequate for tumours located between the distal transverse and the proximal descending colon.
Entities:
Keywords:
Colorectal cancer; Hemicolectomy; Outcomes; Surgery
Authors: L P Fielding; P A Arsenault; P H Chapuis; O Dent; B Gathright; J D Hardcastle; P Hermanek; J R Jass; R C Newland Journal: J Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 1991 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 4.029
Authors: Ana L Gleisner; Harveshp Mogal; Rebecca Dodson; Jon Efron; Susan Gearhart; Elizabeth Wick; Anne Lidor; Joseph M Herman; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2013-09-14 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: J Martín Arévalo; D Moro-Valdezate; S A García-Botello; V Pla-Martí; M Garcés-Albir; L Pérez Santiago; A Vargas-Durán; A Espí-Macías Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2018-05-29 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: G Manceau; S Benoist; Y Panis; A Rault; M Mathonnet; D Goere; J J Tuech; D Collet; C Penna; M Karoui Journal: Tech Coloproctol Date: 2020-01-14 Impact factor: 3.781
Authors: Lieve G J Leijssen; Anne M Dinaux; Ramzi Amri; Hiroko Kunitake; Liliana G Bordeianou; David L Berger Journal: World J Surg Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 3.352