Literature DB >> 27023010

Calibrated Passive Sampling--Multi-plot Field Measurements of NH3 Emissions with a Combination of Dynamic Tube Method and Passive Samplers.

Andreas Pacholski1.   

Abstract

Agricultural ammonia (NH3) emissions (90% of total EU emissions) are responsible for about 45% airborne eutrophication, 31% soil acidification and 12% fine dust formation within the EU15. But NH3 emissions also mean a considerable loss of nutrients. Many studies on NH3 emission from organic and mineral fertilizer application have been performed in recent decades. Nevertheless, research related to NH3 emissions after application fertilizers is still limited in particular with respect to relationships to emissions, fertilizer type, site conditions and crop growth. Due to the variable response of crops to treatments, effects can only be validated in experimental designs including field replication for statistical testing. The dominating ammonia loss methods yielding quantitative emissions require large field areas, expensive equipment or current supply, which restricts their application in replicated field trials. This protocol describes a new methodology for the measurement of NH3 emissions on many plots linking a simple semi-quantitative measuring method used in all plots, with a quantitative method by simultaneous measurements using both methods on selected plots. As a semi-quantitative measurement method passive samplers are used. The second method is a dynamic chamber method (Dynamic Tube Method) to obtain a transfer quotient, which converts the semi-quantitative losses of the passive sampler to quantitative losses (kg nitrogen ha(-1)). The principle underlying this approach is that passive samplers placed in a homogeneous experimental field have the same NH3 absorption behavior under identical environmental conditions. Therefore, a transfer co-efficient obtained from single passive samplers can be used to scale the values of all passive samplers used in the same field trial. The method proved valid under a wide range of experimental conditions and is recommended to be used under conditions with bare soil or small canopies (<0.3 m). Results obtained from experiments with taller plants should be treated more carefully.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27023010      PMCID: PMC4829040          DOI: 10.3791/53273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  4 in total

1.  Passive ammonia monitoring in the United States: comparing three different sampling devices.

Authors:  Melissa A Puchalski; Mark E Sather; John T Walker; Christopher M B Lehmann; David A Gay; Johnson Mathew; Wayne P Robarge
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2011-10-19

Review 2.  Measuring ammonia concentrations and emissions from agricultural land and liquid surfaces: a review.

Authors:  Sanjay B Shah; Philip W Westerman; Jactone Arogo
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.235

3.  Too much of a good thing.

Authors:  Mark A Sutton; Oene Oenema; Jan Willem Erisman; Adrian Leip; Hans van Grinsven; Wilfried Winiwarter
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-04-10       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Development and types of passive samplers for monitoring atmospheric NO2 and NH3 concentrations.

Authors:  Y S Tang; J N Cape; M A Sutton
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2001-10-09
  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  A three-year data set of gaseous field emissions from crop sequence at three sites in Germany.

Authors:  Janine Mallast; Heinz Stichnothe; Thomas Kreuter; Enrico Thiel; Claudia Pommer; Johannes Döhler; Florian Eissner; Insa Kühling; Jan Rücknagel; Henning Pamperin; Jürgen Augustin; Mathias Hoffmann; Anja Simon; Kurt-Jürgen Hülsbergen; Franz-Xaver Maidl; Nadine Tauchnitz; Joachim Bischoff; Falk Böttcher
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 8.501

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.