| Literature DB >> 27022471 |
Emilie M Outzen1, Marina Zaki1, Bahareh Abdolalizadeh1, Anette Sams2, Harrie C M Boonen1, Majid Sheykhzade1.
Abstract
Mice are increasingly used in vascular research for studying perturbations and responses to vasoactive agents in small artery preparations. Historically, small artery function has preferably been studied in rat isolated mesenteric resistance-sized arteries (MRA) using the wire myograph technique. Although different mouse arteries have been studied using the wire myograph no establishment of optimal settings has yet been performed. Therefore, the purposes of this study were firstly to establish the optimal settings for wire myograph studies of mouse MRA and compare them to those of rat MRA. Second, by surveying the literature, we aimed to evaluate the overall translatability of observed pharmacological vasomotor responses of mouse MRA to those obtained in rat MRA as well as corresponding and different arteries in terms of vessel size and species origin. Our results showed that the optimal conditions for maximal active force development in mouse MRA were not significantly different to those determined in rat MRA. Furthermore, we found that the observed concentration-dependent vasomotor responses of mouse MRA to noradrenaline, phenylephrine, angiotensin II, sarafotoxin 6c, 5-hydroxytryptamine, carbachol, sodium nitroprusside, and retigabine were generally similar to those described in rat MRA as well as arteries of different sizes and species origin. In summary, the results of this study provide a framework for evidence-based optimization of the isometric wire myograph setup to mouse MRA. Additionally, in terms of translational value, our study suggests that mouse MRA can be applied as a useful model for studying vascular reactivity.Entities:
Keywords: Mechanical properties; mesenteric resistance arteries; mouse; normalization; rat; translation; vasomotor properties; wire myograph
Year: 2015 PMID: 27022471 PMCID: PMC4777254 DOI: 10.1002/prp2.200
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmacol Res Perspect ISSN: 2052-1707
Estimated parameters from internal circumference (IC)‐tension relationship study of mouse and rat mesenteric resistance‐sized arteries
| Mouse | Rat |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 14 (8) | 19 (7) | – |
| IC0 ( | 526 ± 30.8 | 697 ± 16.0 |
|
| IC100 ( | 601 ± 39.4 | 830 ± 22.0 |
|
| PWT0 (N m−1) | 0.74 ± 0.07 | 0.76 ± 0.06 | NS |
|
| 1.56 ± 0.11 | 3.47 ± 0.33 |
|
| PWT‐IC slope, | 0.008 ± 0.0005 | 0.007 ± 0.0003 |
|
| IC0/IC100 | 0.88 ± 0.02 | 0.84 ± 0.01 | NS |
IC0 represents the IC where maximal active wall tension, ΔAWT0, was developed, PWT0 is passive wall tension at IC0, and IC100 represents the IC the artery would have had when subjected to a passive transmural pressure of 100 mmHg. Values are presented as mean ± SEM with n = artery segments and N = animals. The statistical analysis was performed with an unpaired t‐test with *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and NS, not statistically significant.
Figure 1Internal circumference (IC)‐tension relationships of mouse and rat mesenteric resistance‐sized arteries (MRA). (A) Passive and (B) active tension‐IC relationships of mouse 2nd order (filled labels and lines) and rat 3rd order (open labels and dashed lines) MRAs. The points represent each replicate artery segment fitted to (A) a mean exponential growth curve with 1/Y2 weighting and (B) a mean Gaussian distribution curve. See Table 1 for estimated parameters.
Characteristics of mouse mesenteric resistance‐sized artery segments used for in vitro pharmacological characterization
| Parameter | |
|---|---|
|
| 22 (14) |
| IC0 ( | 602 ± 26.8 |
| Tension in PSS (N m−1) | 0.61 ± 0.05 |
| Active tension in K‐PSS (N m−1) | 1.28 ± 0.09 |
Wall tension is expressed as Newton per meter, N m−1. IC0 equals 0.9·IC100 where IC100 represents the internal circumference the artery would have had when subjected to a passive transmural pressure of 100 mmHg. PSS refers to physiological salt solution, K‐PSS is PSS where all sodium is replaced with with an equimolar amount of potassium resulting in a total K+ concentration of 125 mmol/L. Tension in K‐PSS represents the total wall tension minus wall tension in PSS. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM with n = artery segments and N = animals.
pEC50 values of selected vasoactive agents in mouse, rat, and human mesenteric arteries
| Mouse | Rat | Human | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated | Literature | Literature | Literature | |||||
| Phenylephrine | 6.35 ± 0.15 | (6) | 7.73 | Longo et al. ( | 5.65–6.2 | Buus et al. ( | ||
| Noradrenaline | 5.68 ± 0.12 | (9) | 6.59 | Kleinbongard et al. ( | 5.77–6.79 | Nielsen and Mulvany ( | 6.06–6.24 | Muller‐Schweinitzer et al. ( |
| Sarafotoxin 6c | 8.65 ± 0.14 | (10) | ||||||
| Carbachol | 6.09 ± 0.11 | (11) | 5.59 | Kleinbongard et al. ( | 6.51–7.28 | Vuylsteke et al. ( | 6.40 | Hutri‐Kahonen et al. ( |
| SNP | 7.81 ± 0.26 | (5) | 6.49–9.49 | Hassanain et al. ( | 6.72 | Muller‐Schweinitzer et al. ( | ||
| Retigabine | 5.56 ± 0.09 | (4) | 5.52 | Schleifenbaum et al. ( | ||||
pEC50 represents the negative logarithm of the concentration of the agonist required to produce a half‐maximal response. Values are presented as mean ± SEM with n = artery segments indicated between parentheses. Values estimated for sarafotoxin 6c are determined within the concentration range 10 pmol/L–30 nmol/L. “Estimated” refers to values obtained in our study in 2nd order mesenteric resistance‐sized artery segments from C57BL/6 mice. “Literature” refers to pEC50 values in mouse, rat, and human mesenteric arteries described in the literature. SNP, sodium nitroprusside, *pEC50 of acetylcholine.
Figure 2Cumulative concentration‐dependent responses of mouse mesenteric resistance‐sized arteries to selected vasoactive agents. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM with n = artery segments and N = animals in brackets. Cumulative concentration‐dependent responses of mouse 2nd order mesenteric resistance‐sized arteries (MRA) to (A) phenylephrine (open circle, n = 6 [4]), noradrenaline (filled square, n = 10 [6]), angiotensin II (open triangle, n = 16 [9]), sarafotoxin 6c (filled circle, n = 16 [9]), and 5‐HT (filled diamond, n = 4 [2]) (Inset figure provides fine‐scale resolution for responses to Ang II, S6c, and 5‐HT) and (B) carbachol (open circle, n = 11 [8]), retigabine (filled square, n = 4 [3]), and sodium nitroprusside (open triangle, n = 5 [3]). Vasoconstrictive responses are presented as active wall tension (Δ AWT, N m−1) and vasodilation is presented as percentage of precontraction. The concentration‐dependent responses are fitted to nonlinear regression curves where possible. See Table 3 for estimated pEC 50 values.
Figure 3Representative traces of cumulative concentration‐dependent responses of mouse mesenteric resistance‐sized arteries to phenylephrine and angiotensin II. (A) phenylephrine, 1 nmol/L–10 μmol/L and (B) angiotensin II, 10 pmol/L–300 nmol/L.