Literature DB >> 27022038

Novel Treatments for Rare Cancers: The U.S. Orphan Drug Act Is Delivering-A Cross-Sectional Analysis.

Clemens Stockklausner1, Anette Lampert2, Georg F Hoffmann3, Markus Ries4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rare cancers are a heterogeneous group of conditions with highly unmet medical needs. Although infrequent in individuals, rare cancers affect millions of people who deserve effective treatments. Therefore, we systematically analyzed the impact of the U.S. Orphan Drug Act of 1983 on delivery of novel treatments for rare cancers.
METHODS: Quantitative cross-sectional analysis was conducted on the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Orphan Drug Product database according to Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology Statement criteria between 1983 and 2015.
RESULTS: Since 1983, a total of 177 approvals have originated from 1,391 orphan drug designations to treat rare cancers, which represents 36% of all approvals within the U.S. orphan drug act (n = 492). Two compounds (1%) to treat rare cancer were withdrawn after approval. Median time from designation to approval was 2.49 years (interquartile range 1.13-4.64) and decreased significantly over time (p < .001, linear regression). Over the last decade, rare cancer treatments have been transformed from nonspecific cytotoxic agents toward targeted therapies, such as protein kinase inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies, representing the largest groups of innovative rare cancer treatments today. Most compounds were approved to treat solid tumors and hematological malignancies.
CONCLUSION: The U.S. Orphan Drug Act and associated incentives, such as 7 years of marketing exclusivity, have fostered delivery of novel treatments for rare cancers. More than one-third of all orphan drug approvals address needs of patients suffering from rare cancers. Over the last decade, the understanding of tumorigenesis and genetic driver mutations in different tumor entities has produced innovative treatments, of which many were first approved within the U.S. Orphan Drug Act. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Over the last 30 years, the U.S. Orphan Drug Act successfully delivered numerous novel treatments for rare cancers, of which some were subsequently used in other, nonorphan indications. The understanding of molecular mechanisms of diseases is directly connected to the search for novel therapies. The constant pursuit to translate basic research findings into clinical practice is a crucial prerequisite to address unmet medical needs in rare cancers, as in other rare diseases. Oncological drug development proves to be a major player in overall orphan drug research, displayed by more than one-third of all U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved orphan drugs with oncological indications. ©AlphaMed Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Orphan Drug Act; Orphan drug development; Rare cancer; Rare diseases

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27022038      PMCID: PMC4828121          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0397

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  18 in total

1.  The impact of new (orphan) drug approvals on premature mortality from rare diseases in the United States and France, 1999-2007.

Authors:  Frank R Lichtenberg
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2011-09-28

Review 2.  Developing oncology biosimilars: an essential approach for the future.

Authors:  Jame Abraham
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.929

3.  Does orphan drug legislation really answer the needs of patients?

Authors:  Marlene E Haffner; Josep Torrent-Farnell; Paul D Maher
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 4.  Why rare diseases are an important medical and social issue.

Authors:  Arrigo Schieppati; Jan-Inge Henter; Erica Daina; Anita Aperia
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  The roles of patents and research and development incentives in biopharmaceutical innovation.

Authors:  Henry G Grabowski; Joseph A DiMasi; Genia Long
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  Rare diseases and effective treatments: are we delivering?

Authors:  Lucio Luzzatto; Carla E M Hollak; Timothy M Cox; Arrigo Schieppati; Christoph Licht; Helena Kääriäinen; Giampaolo Merlini; Franz Schaefer; Steven Simoens; Luca Pani; Silvio Garattini; Giuseppe Remuzzi
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  IDEC-C2B8: results of a phase I multiple-dose trial in patients with relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  D G Maloney; A J Grillo-López; D J Bodkin; C A White; T M Liles; I Royston; C Varns; J Rosenberg; R Levy
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Efficacy and safety of a specific inhibitor of the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase in chronic myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  B J Druker; M Talpaz; D J Resta; B Peng; E Buchdunger; J M Ford; N B Lydon; H Kantarjian; R Capdeville; S Ohno-Jones; C L Sawyers
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-04-05       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012.

Authors:  Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rajesh Dikshit; Sultan Eser; Colin Mathers; Marise Rebelo; Donald Maxwell Parkin; David Forman; Freddie Bray
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  Pressure for drug development in lysosomal storage disorders - a quantitative analysis thirty years beyond the US orphan drug act.

Authors:  Konstantin Mechler; William K Mountford; Georg F Hoffmann; Markus Ries
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 4.123

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Enzyme replacement therapy and beyond-in memoriam Roscoe O. Brady, M.D. (1923-2016).

Authors:  Markus Ries
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 4.982

2.  Using four decades of FDA orphan drug designations to describe trends in rare disease drug development: substantial growth seen in development of drugs for rare oncologic, neurologic, and pediatric-onset diseases.

Authors:  Kathleen L Miller; Lewis J Fermaglich; Janet Maynard
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.123

3.  Novel treatments for rare rheumatologic disorders: analysis of the impact of 30 years of the US orphan drug act.

Authors:  Thomas Lutz; Anette Lampert; Georg F Hoffmann; Markus Ries
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 4.123

4.  Thirty Years of Orphan Drug Legislation and the Development of Drugs to Treat Rare Seizure Conditions: A Cross Sectional Analysis.

Authors:  Jan Henje Döring; Anette Lampert; Georg F Hoffmann; Markus Ries
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Ethical imperatives of timely access to orphan drugs: is possible to reconcile economic incentives and patients' health needs?

Authors:  R Rodriguez-Monguio; T Spargo; E Seoane-Vazquez
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 4.123

6.  Orphan drug development in alpha-1 antitypsin deficiency.

Authors:  Franziska C Trudzinski; Maria Ada Presotto; Emanuel Buck; Felix J F Herth; Markus Ries
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 7.  The Challenges of Clinical Research in Rare Cancers: Bevacizumab Use in Low-Grade Serous Ovarian and Primary Peritoneal Cancers.

Authors:  Carolyn Grande; Constance Visovsky; Marcia S Brose
Journal:  J Adv Pract Oncol       Date:  2017-05-01

8.  Disease awareness or subtle product placement? Orphan diseases featured in the television series "House, M.D." - a cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  Konstantin Mechler; Juliane Rausch; William K Mountford; Markus Ries
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 2.652

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.