Literature DB >> 21953319

The impact of new (orphan) drug approvals on premature mortality from rare diseases in the United States and France, 1999-2007.

Frank R Lichtenberg1.   

Abstract

This paper investigates the impact of the introduction of new orphan drugs on premature mortality from rare diseases using longitudinal, disease-level data obtained from a number of major databases. The analysis is performed using data from two countries: the United States (during the period 1999-2006) and France (during the period 2000-2007). For both countries, we estimate models using two alternative definitions of premature mortality, several alternative criteria for inclusion in the set of rare diseases, and several values of the potential lag between new drug approvals and premature mortality reduction. Both the United States and French estimates indicate that, overall, premature mortality from rare diseases is unrelated to the cumulative number of drugs approved 0-2 years earlier but is significantly inversely related to the cumulative number of drugs approved 3-4 years earlier. This delay is not surprising, since most patients probably do not have access to a drug until several years after it has been launched. Although the estimates for the two countries are qualitatively similar, the estimated magnitudes of the US coefficients are about four times as large as the magnitudes of the French coefficients. This may be partly due to greater errors in measuring dates of drug introduction in France. Also, access to new drugs may be more restricted in France than it is in the United States. Our estimates indicate that, in the United States, potential years of life lost to rare diseases before age 65 (PYLL65) declined at an average annual rate of 3.3% and that, in the absence of lagged new drug approvals, PYLL65 would have increased at a rate of 0.9%. Since the US population aged 0-64 was increasing at the rate of 1.0% per year, this means that PYLL65 per person under 65 would have remained approximately constant. The reduction in the US growth rate of PYLL65 attributable to lagged new drug approvals was 4.2%. In France, PYLL65 declined at an average annual rate of 1.8%. The estimates imply that, in the absence of lagged new drug approvals, it would have declined at a rate of 0.6%. The reduction in the French growth rate of PYLL65 attributable to lagged new drug approvals was 1.1%. Earlier access to orphan drugs could result in earlier reductions in premature mortality from rare diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21953319     DOI: 10.1007/s10198-011-0349-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Health Econ        ISSN: 1618-7598


  2 in total

1.  Have newer cardiovascular drugs reduced hospitalization? Evidence from longitudinal country-level data on 20 OECD countries, 1995-2003.

Authors:  Frank R Lichtenberg
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Perioperative platelet transfusion: recommendations of the Agence Française de Sécurité Sanitaire des Produits de Santé (AFSSaPS) 2003.

Authors:  Charles Marc Samama; Rachid Djoudi; Thomas Lecompte; Nathalie Nathan-Denizot; Jean-François Schved
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.063

  2 in total
  5 in total

1.  On the Creation, Utility and Sustaining of Rare Diseases Research Networks: Lessons learned from the Urea Cycle Disorders Consortium, the Japanese Urea Cycle Disorders Consortium and the European Registry and Network for Intoxication Type Metabolic Diseases.

Authors:  Marshall L Summar; Fumio Endo; Stefan Kölker
Journal:  Mol Genet Metab       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.797

Review 2.  Pharmaceutical innovation: impact on expenditure and outcomes and subsequent challenges for pharmaceutical policy, with a special reference to Greece.

Authors:  E Karampli; K Souliotis; N Polyzos; J Kyriopoulos; E Chatzaki
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 0.471

3.  Novel Treatments for Rare Cancers: The U.S. Orphan Drug Act Is Delivering-A Cross-Sectional Analysis.

Authors:  Clemens Stockklausner; Anette Lampert; Georg F Hoffmann; Markus Ries
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-03-28

4.  Has the development of cancer biomarkers to guide treatment improved health outcomes?

Authors:  Ana Beatriz D Avó Luís; Mikyung Kelly Seo
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2021-03-30

5.  Do investors value the FDA orphan drug designation?

Authors:  Kathleen L Miller
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 4.123

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.