Literature DB >> 27021334

Poor agreement of objectively measured and self-reported physical activity in juvenile dermatomyositis and juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus.

Ana Jéssica Pinto1, Hamilton Roschel1,2, Fabiana Braga Benatti1,2, Ana Lúcia de Sá Pinto2, Adriana Maluf Elias Sallum3, Clóvis Arthur Silva3, Bruno Gualano4,5.   

Abstract

To examine the agreement and association between objectively measured and indirectly assessed physical activity levels in patients with juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) and juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus (JSLE) patients. The sample consisted of 19 JDM patients (age 8 to 22 years) and 20 JSLE patients (age 9 to 18 years). Physical activity level was objectively measured using Actigraph® accelerometers and indirectly assessed by the short-form International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). Spearman's correlation coefficients were calculated to test possible associations between physical activity levels across the two instruments. The Bland-Altman technique was used to calculate bias and limits of agreement. Correlations between objectively measured and indirectly assessed physical activity levels in JDM and JSLE were weak, varying from R = 0.03 to R = 0.33 (all p > 0.05). Total physical activity was correlated between accelerometer and IPAQ in JSLE (R = 0.51, p = 0.021). Bland-Altman analyses suggested that IPAQ tended to highly underestimate sedentary time and light physical activity in JDM (mean bias 105.7 and 199.8 min, respectively) and JSLE (mean bias 36.4 and 127.8 min, respectively). Mean biases of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity were also highly variable, ranging from -42.9 to 54.9 min and -59.4 to 89.8 min for JDM and JSLE, respectively. IPAQ was shown to not be valid to assess physical activity levels in patients with JDM and JSLE when compared against accelerometry. While the validation of reliable self-reported instruments that measure physical activity in pediatric rheumatic patients remains necessary, the use of validated tools that objectively measure physical activity is recommended in both clinical and research settings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accelerometer; IPAQ; Pediatric rheumatic disease; Physical activity level

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27021334     DOI: 10.1007/s10067-016-3234-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 0770-3198            Impact factor:   2.980


  41 in total

Review 1.  Qualitative attributes and measurement properties of physical activity questionnaires: a checklist.

Authors:  Caroline B Terwee; Lidwine B Mokkink; Mireille N M van Poppel; Mai J M Chinapaw; Willem van Mechelen; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Effectiveness of a computer tailored physical activity intervention in adolescents compared to a generic advice.

Authors:  Leen Haerens; Lea Maes; Carine Vereecken; Stefaan De Henauw; Luis Moreno; Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-04-29

3.  Validity of four motion sensors in measuring moderate intensity physical activity.

Authors:  D R Bassett; B E Ainsworth; A M Swartz; S J Strath; W L O'Brien; G A King
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 4.  Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine.

Authors:  G Atkinson; A M Nevill
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  M C Hochberg
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1997-09

6.  Exercise training in juvenile dermatomyositis.

Authors:  Clarissa Harumi Omori; Clovis Artur Almeida Silva; Adriana Maluf Elias Sallum; Rosa Maria Rodrigues Pereira; Ana Lúciade Sá Pinto; Hamilton Roschel; Bruno Gualano
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.794

Review 7.  Physical activity: from epidemiological evidence to individualized patient management.

Authors:  Olivier Luc Charansonney; Luc Vanhees; Alain Cohen-Solal
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 4.164

Review 8.  The development and initial validation of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology damage index for systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  D Gladman; E Ginzler; C Goldsmith; P Fortin; M Liang; M Urowitz; P Bacon; S Bombardieri; J Hanly; E Hay; D Isenberg; J Jones; K Kalunian; P Maddison; O Nived; M Petri; M Richter; J Sanchez-Guerrero; M Snaith; G Sturfelt; D Symmons; A Zoma
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1996-03

9.  Physical activity in children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis: quantification and evaluation.

Authors:  C J Henderson; D J Lovell; B L Specker; B N Campaigne
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res       Date:  1995-06

10.  Responsiveness to exercise training in juvenile dermatomyositis: a twin case study.

Authors:  Clarissa Omori; Danilo M L Prado; Bruno Gualano; Adriana M E Sallum; Ana L Sá-Pinto; Hamilton Roschel; Maria B Perondi; Clovis A A Silva
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Update on outcome assessment in myositis.

Authors:  Lisa G Rider; Rohit Aggarwal; Pedro M Machado; Jean-Yves Hogrel; Ann M Reed; Lisa Christopher-Stine; Nicolino Ruperto
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 2.  Critical evaluation of physical activity questionnaires translated to Brazilian-Portuguese: a systematic review on cross-cultural adaptation and measurements properties.

Authors:  Fernanda Gonçalves Silva; Crystian Bitencourt Oliveira; Thalysi Mayumi Hisamatsu; Ruben Faria Negrão Filho; Caio Russo Dutra Rodrigues; Marcia Rodrigues Franco; Rafael Zambelli Pinto
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2019-05-05       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 3.  Physical activity for paediatric rheumatic diseases: standing up against old paradigms.

Authors:  Bruno Gualano; Eloisa Bonfa; Rosa M R Pereira; Clovis A Silva
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 4.  Assessment of Physical Activity and Muscle Function in Adult Inflammatory Myopathies.

Authors:  William J Gregory; Didem Saygin
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 4.592

5.  Objectively measured versus self-reported physical activity in children and adolescents with cancer.

Authors:  Miriam Götte; Corinna Caroline Seidel; Sabine Verena Kesting; Dieter Rosenbaum; Joachim Boos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Longitudinal Changes in Physical Activity Level, Body Mass Index, and Oxygen Uptake Among Norwegian Adolescents.

Authors:  Pål Lagestad; Roland van den Tillaar; Asgeir Mamen
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2018-03-29

7.  A home-based exercise program during COVID-19 pandemic: Perceptions and acceptability of juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus and juvenile idiopathic arthritis adolescents.

Authors:  Sofia Mendes Sieczkowska; Camilla Astley; Isabela Gouveia Marques; Amanda Yuri Iraha; Tathiane Christine Franco; Bianca Pires Ihara; Sofia Simão Martins Lavorato; Livia Lindoso; Debora Narumi Demitrol Setoue; Nicolas Yamada Tanigava; Lucia Maria Arruda Campos; Rosa Maria Rodrigues Pereira; Nadia Emi Aikawa; Hamilton Roschel; Ligia Bruni Queiroz; Guilherme V Polanczyk; Clovis Artur Silva; Bruno Gualano
Journal:  Lupus       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 2.911

8.  A review of accelerometer-derived physical activity in the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.

Authors:  Alexander Oldroyd; Max A Little; William Dixon; Hector Chinoy
Journal:  BMC Rheumatol       Date:  2019-10-21
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.