| Literature DB >> 27021114 |
Hemayet Hossain1, Shaikh Emdadur Rahman2, Proity Nayeeb Akbar3, Tanzir Ahmed Khan4, Md Mahfuzur Rahman4, Ismet Ara Jahan3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Syzygium jambos has been used as a traditional medicine for the treatment of inflammatory diseases in Bangladesh. The study investigates the high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) profiling of phenolic compounds, and evaluates the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of ethanol extract of S. jambos available in Bangladesh.Entities:
Keywords: ABTS; Carrageenan; Catechin hydrate; HPLC; Reducing power; Syzygium jambos
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27021114 PMCID: PMC4810503 DOI: 10.1186/s13104-016-2000-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Res Notes ISSN: 1756-0500
Fig. 1HPLC chromatogram of ethanol extract of S. jambos. Peaks 1 catechin hydrate (CH), 2 rutin hydrate (RH), 3 ellagic acid (EA), 4 quercetin (QU)
Contents of bioactive polyphenolic compounds in the ethanol extract of S. jambos (n = 5)
| Polyphenolic compound | Ethanol extract of | % RSD |
|---|---|---|
| Content (mg/100 g of dry extract) | ||
| CH | 99.00 | 1.88 |
| RH | 79.20 | 1.59 |
| EA | 59.40 | 1.36 |
| QU | 69.30 | 1.47 |
ABTS radical scavenging activity of ethanol extract of S. jambos with ascorbic acid
| Concentration (µg/ml) | % Inhibition at different concentration | |
|---|---|---|
| Ethanol extract | Ascorbic acid | |
| 10 | 14.82 ± 0.23 | 48.60 ± 0.17 |
| 20 | 25.31 ± 0.12 | 85.79 ± 0.25 |
| 40 | 46.66 ± 0.19 | 99.19 ± 0.21 |
| 60 | 67.25 ± 0.13 | 99.25 ± 0.29 |
| 80 | 82.69 ± 0.16 | 99.53 ± 0.24 |
| 100 | 97.82 ± 0.15 | 95.58 ± 0.18 |
| 250 | 97.85 ± 0.14 | 99.85 ± 0.27 |
| IC50 | 57.80 ± 0.18 | 12.01 ± 0.12 |
The values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3)
Reducing power assay of ethanol extract of S. jambos with ascorbic acid
| Concentration (µg/ml) | Average absorbance at 700 nm | |
|---|---|---|
| Ethanol extract | Ascorbic acid | |
| 10 | 0.0282 ± 0.014 | 0.3801 ± 0.012 |
| 20 | 0.0422 ± 0.016 | 0.4577 ± 0.017 |
| 40 | 0.0998 ± 0.017 | 0.5398 ± 0.023 |
| 60 | 0.1497 ± 0.013 | 0.6345 ± 0.037 |
| 80 | 0.1739 ± 0.021 | 0.7125 ± 0.013 |
| 100 | 0.2329 ± 0.014 | 0.7811 ± 0.029 |
| 250 | 0.4934 ± 0.027 | 1.1115 ± 0.009 |
The values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3)
Total antioxidant capacity of ethanol extract of S. jambos
| Ethanol extract | Avg. absorbance at 695 nm | Total antioxidant capacity |
|---|---|---|
| Mg of ascorbic acid equivalent (AAE) per gm of dry extract | ||
|
| 0.329 ± 0.01 | 628.5 ± 0.14 |
The values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3)
Total phenolic and flavonoid content of ethanol extract of S. jambos
| Ethanol extract | Total phenolic content | Total flavonoid content |
|---|---|---|
| Mg of gallic acid equivalent (GAE) per g of dry extract | Mg of quercetin equivalent (QE) per gm of dry extract | |
|
| 230.82 ± 0.06 | 11.84 ± 0.01 |
The values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3)
Effects of ethanol extract of S. jambos and indomethacin on carrageenan-induced oedema paw volume in wistar rats
| Treatment | Dose | Right hind paw volume (% inhibition) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (mg/kg) | 1 h | 2 h | 3 h | 4 h | 5 h | |
| Vehicle | 10 (ml/kg) | 0.98 ± 0.12 | 1.07 ± 0.16 | 1.26 ± 0.21 | 1.35 ± 0.23 | 1.43 ± 0.25 |
| Indomethacin | 10 | 0.46 ± 0.15 (53.06)* | 0.47 ± 0.19 (56.07)* | 0.53 ± 0.17 (57.94)* | 0.54 ± 0.16 (60.00)* | 0.53 ± 0.18 (62.94)** |
|
| 200 | 0.74 ± 0.13 (24.49)* | 0.69 ± 0.14 (35.51)* | 0.74 ± 0.18 (41.27)** | 0.75 ± 0.15 (44.44)* | 0.73 ± 0.17 (48.95)** |
|
| 400 | 0.65 ± 0.15 (33.67)* | 0.58 ± 0.17 (45.79)** | 0.59 ± 0.19 (53.18)** | 0.61 ± 0.18 (54.82)* | 0.60 ± 0.17 (58.04)** |
Each value is presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 5)
* P < 0.05 compared with control group (Dunnett’s test)
** P < 0.01 compared with control group (Dunnett’s test)
Effect of ethanol extract of S. jambos and indomethacin on histamine-induced oedema paw volume in wistar rats
| Treatment | Dose | Right hind paw volume (% Inhibition) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (mg/kg) | 1 h | 2 h | 3 h | 4 h | 5 h | |
| Vehicle | 10 (ml/kg) | 1.10 ± 0.15 | 1.25 ± 0.19 | 1.34 ± 0.18 | 1.40 ± 0.22 | 1.52 ± 0.21 |
| Indomethacin | 10 | 0.56 ± 0.14 (49.09)* | 0.57 ± 0.16 (54.40)* | 0.58 ± 0.15 (56.72)* | 0.53 ± 0.19 (62.14)** | 0.52 ± 0.13 (65.79)** |
|
| 200 | 0.76 ± 0.11 (30.91) | 0.80 ± 0.17 (36.00)** | 0.86 ± 0.23 (35.82)* | 0.84 ± 0.15 (40.00)** | 0.82 ± 0.18 (46.05)** |
|
| 400 | 0.67 ± 0.13 (39.09) | 0.69 ± 0.14 (44.80)* | 0.72 ± 0.16 (46.27)* | 0.74 ± 0.14 (47.14)* | 0.70 ± 0.19 (53.95)** |
Each value is presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 5)
* P < 0.05 compared with control group (Dunnett’s test)
** P < 0.01 compared with control group (Dunnett’s test)