Literature DB >> 27020444

Diagnostic impact of dysmorphic red blood cells on evaluating microscopic hematuria: the urologist's perspective.

Kyo Chul Koo1, Kwang Suk Lee1, Ah Ran Choi2, Koon Ho Rha1, Sung Joon Hong1, Byung Ha Chung3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Dysmorphic red blood cells (dRBCs) are indicative of glomerular disease and considered a first step in evaluating microscopic hematuria (MH). The predominance of dRBCs does not preclude urological disease; however, some contemporary guidelines advise nephrological evaluation without further urological evaluation, in contrast to the American Urological Association guideline. We investigated the feasibility and safety of omitting urological evaluation in patients presenting with MH.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 411 consecutive patients who presented with MH between January 2012 and December 2014. MH was defined as ≥3 RBCs per high-power field. All patients received full urological and nephrological evaluations including history and physical assessment, renal function, urine cytology, %dRBC, cystoscopy, computed tomography (CT) imaging, and renal biopsy when indicated.
RESULTS: The median %dRBC was higher in patients with glomerular disease than in those with urological disease (40.4 vs. 21.1 %; p < 0.001). Among patients exhibiting %dRBC ≥ 40, 33/97 (34.0 %) had urological and 28/97 (28.9 %) had glomerular diseases. Urological diseases included 9/33 (27.3 %) clinically meaningful malignancies and 17/33 (51.5 %) conditions requiring immediate treatment. The rate of malignancy was comparable between %dRBC groups (p = 0.087). Among patients with final diagnoses who exhibited %dRBC ≥ 40, 32/61 (52.5 %) treatment-requiring conditions would have been unrecognized had cystoscopy and/or CT not been performed. For predicting glomerular disease, the presence of proteinuria demonstrated higher AUC than %dRBC ≥ 40 (0.77 vs. 0.65; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Identification of %dRBC ≥ 40 had modest diagnostic value in identifying glomerular disease, and concomitant presence of proteinuria was more indicative of glomerular origin in patients presenting with MH. Urological evaluation should not be omitted in these patients considering the prevalence of treatment-requiring urological disease.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dysmorphism; Erythrocytes; Guideline; Hematuria; Neoplasms

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27020444     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-016-1265-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  24 in total

1.  Canadian guidelines for the management of asymptomatic microscopic hematuria in adults.

Authors:  Tim Wollin; Bruno Laroche; Karen Psooy
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Evaluation of asymptomatic microscopic haematuria--influence and clinical relevance of osmolality and pH on urinary erythrocyte morphology.

Authors:  M Georgopoulos; F X Schuster; P Porpaczy; P Schramek
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1996-08

3.  Association of hematuria on microscopic urinalysis and risk of urinary tract cancer.

Authors:  Howard Jung; Joseph M Gleason; Ronald K Loo; Hetal S Patel; Jeff M Slezak; Steven J Jacobsen
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  A new diagnostic algorithm for the evaluation of microscopic hematuria.

Authors:  J S Jaffe; P C Ginsberg; R Gill; R C Harkaway
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Diagnostic value of urinary dysmorphic erythrocytes in clinical practice.

Authors:  Meindert J Crop; Yolanda B de Rijke; Paul C M S Verhagen; Karlien Cransberg; Robert Zietse
Journal:  Nephron Clin Pract       Date:  2010-04-23

6.  Diagnosis, evaluation and follow-up of asymptomatic microhematuria (AMH) in adults: AUA guideline.

Authors:  Rodney Davis; J Stephen Jones; Daniel A Barocas; Erik P Castle; Erich K Lang; Raymond J Leveillee; Edward M Messing; Scott D Miller; Andrew C Peterson; Thomas M T Turk; William Weitzel
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Detection of glomerular bleeding by phase-contrast microscopy.

Authors:  R G Fassett; B A Horgan; T H Mathew
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1982-06-26       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Are patients with hematuria appropriately referred to Urology? A multi-institutional questionnaire based survey.

Authors:  Alan M Nieder; Yair Lotan; Geoffrey R Nuss; Joshua P Langston; Sachin Vyas; Murugesan Manoharan; Mark S Soloway
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2008-12-20       Impact factor: 3.498

9.  Phase contrast microscopy of the urine sediment for the diagnosis of glomerular and nonglomerular bleeding-data in children and adults with normal creatinine clearance.

Authors:  N G De Santo; F Nuzzi; G Capodicasa; G Lama; G Caputo; P Rosati; C Giordano
Journal:  Nephron       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.847

10.  Phase contrast microscopic examination of urinary erythrocytes to localise source of bleeding: an overlooked technique?

Authors:  K S Mohammad; A S Bdesha; M E Snell; R O Witherow; D V Coleman
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  1 in total

1.  Automated urinalysis combining physicochemical analysis, on-board centrifugation, and digital imaging in one system: A multicenter performance evaluation of the cobas 6500 urine work area.

Authors:  Christa M Cobbaert; Figen Arslan; Imma Caballé Martín; Antoni Alsius Serra; Ester Picó-Plana; Víctor Sánchez-Margalet; Antonio Carmona-Fernández; John Burden; André Ziegler; Walter Bechel
Journal:  Pract Lab Med       Date:  2019-09-19
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.