| Literature DB >> 27019850 |
Kiran Dashrath Rasal1, Vemulawada Chakrapani1, Swagat Kumar Patra1, Shibani D Mohapatra1, Swapnarani Nayak1, Sasmita Jena1, Jitendra Kumar Sundaray1, Pallipuram Jayasankar1, Hirak Kumar Barman1.
Abstract
The myostatin (MSTN) is a known negative growth regulator of skeletal muscle. The mutated myostatin showed a double-muscular phenotype having a positive significance for the farmed animals. Consequently, adequate information is not available in the teleosts, including farmed rohu carp, Labeo rohita. In the absence of experimental evidence, computational algorithms were utilized in predicting the impact of point mutation of rohu myostatin, especially its structural and functional relationships. The four mutations were generated at different positions (p.D76A, p.Q204P, p.C312Y, and p.D313A) of MSTN protein of rohu. The impacts of each mutant were analyzed using SIFT, I-Mutant 2.0, PANTHER, and PROVEAN, wherein two substitutions (p.D76A and p.Q204P) were predicted as deleterious. The comparative structural analysis of each mutant protein with the native was explored using 3D modeling as well as molecular-dynamic simulation techniques. The simulation showed altered dynamic behaviors concerning RMSD and RMSF, for either p.D76A or p.Q204P substitution, when compared with the native counterpart. Interestingly, incorporated two mutations imposed a significant negative impact on protein structure and stability. The present study provided the first-hand information in identifying possible amino acids, where mutations could be incorporated into MSTN gene of rohu carp including other carps for undertaking further in vivo studies.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27019850 PMCID: PMC4785247 DOI: 10.1155/2016/7562368
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
List of nsSNPs showing deleterious/nondeleterious scores as predicted by SIFT, PROVEAN, I-Mutant 2, and PANTHER.
| Amino acids change | subPSEC score |
| Prediction by | PROVEAN score | PROVEAN prediction | DDG value | I-Mutant stability | SIFT score | Prediction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D76A | −2.63640 | 0.41009 | Deleterious | −2.887 | Deleterious | −0.75 | Decreased | 0.02 | Deleterious |
| Q204P | −4.03755 | 0.73838 | Tolerated | −2.942 | Deleterious | −0.97 | Decreased | 0.04 | Deleterious |
| C312Y | −11.6194 | 0.99982 | Deleterious | −9.330 | Deleterious | 0.87 | Increased | 0.06 | Tolerated |
| D313A | −1.72365 | 0.3933 | Tolerated | −5.925 | Neutral | 0.92 | Increased | 0.09 | Tolerated |
Figure 1Predicted MSTN models by I-TASSER (both native and mutant) with mutated native and mutated residues.
Figure 2Ramachandran plot of MSTN mutant protein models (a, b, and c). The most favored regions, additional allowed regions, generously allowed regions, and disallowed regions are indicated as dark blue, light blue, light yellow, and white, respectively.
Figure 3ERRAT plots for (a) MSTN native protein and (b) MSTN mutant protein model generated by SAVES. The plots for both proteins show overall quality factors 83.476 and 78.797, respectively. The grey region indicates error region 95% and 99%, white bars show region of lower error rate for protein folding, and black bars show misfolded region located distantly from active site. The below 95% value (i.e., rejection limit) indicates low resolution structure, while more than or 95% value shows high resolution structure.
Figure 4The RMSD and RMSF of both native and mutant MSTN structures of rohu carp (red color: native; blue: mutant MSTN (p.D76A); and green: mutant (p.Q204P).