Literature DB >> 27019675

EMPIRICAL AVERAGE-CASE RELATION BETWEEN UNDERSAMPLING AND SPARSITY IN X-RAY CT.

Jakob S Jørgensen1, Emil Y Sidky2, Per Christian Hansen1, Xiaochuan Pan2.   

Abstract

In X-ray computed tomography (CT) it is generally acknowledged that reconstruction methods exploiting image sparsity allow reconstruction from a significantly reduced number of projections. The use of such reconstruction methods is inspired by recent progress in compressed sensing (CS). However, the CS framework provides neither guarantees of accurate CT reconstruction, nor any relation between sparsity and a sufficient number of measurements for recovery, i.e., perfect reconstruction from noise-free data. We consider reconstruction through 1-norm minimization, as proposed in CS, from data obtained using a standard CT fan-beam sampling pattern. In empirical simulation studies we establish quantitatively a relation between the image sparsity and the sufficient number of measurements for recovery within image classes motivated by tomographic applications. We show empirically that the specific relation depends on the image class and in many cases exhibits a sharp phase transition as seen in CS, i.e., same-sparsity images require the same number of projections for recovery. Finally we demonstrate that the relation holds independently of image size and is robust to small amounts of additive Gaussian white noise.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Inverse problems; compressed sensing; computed tomography; image reconstruction; sparse solutions

Year:  2015        PMID: 27019675      PMCID: PMC4803313          DOI: 10.3934/ipi.2015.9.431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inverse Probl Imaging (Springfield)        ISSN: 1930-8337            Impact factor:   1.639


  16 in total

1.  Task-based assessment of breast tomosynthesis: effect of acquisition parameters and quantum noise.

Authors:  I Reiser; R M Nishikawa
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Neighborliness of randomly projected simplices in high dimensions.

Authors:  David L Donoho; Jared Tanner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-06-22       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Sparse nonnegative solution of underdetermined linear equations by linear programming.

Authors:  David L Donoho; Jared Tanner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-06-23       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Optimally sparse representation in general (nonorthogonal) dictionaries via l minimization.

Authors:  David L Donoho; Michael Elad
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-02-21       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Improved total variation-based CT image reconstruction applied to clinical data.

Authors:  Ludwig Ritschl; Frank Bergner; Christof Fleischmann; Marc Kachelriess
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Deterministic matrices matching the compressed sensing phase transitions of Gaussian random matrices.

Authors:  Hatef Monajemi; Sina Jafarpour; Matan Gavish; David L Donoho
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Why do commercial CT scanners still employ traditional, filtered back-projection for image reconstruction?

Authors:  Xiaochuan Pan; Emil Y Sidky; Michael Vannier
Journal:  Inverse Probl       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 2.407

8.  Image reconstruction exploiting object sparsity in boundary-enhanced X-ray phase-contrast tomography.

Authors:  Emil Y Sidky; Mark A Anastasio; Xiaochuan Pan
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 3.894

9.  Evaluation of sparse-view reconstruction from flat-panel-detector cone-beam CT.

Authors:  Junguo Bian; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen; Xiao Han; Emil Y Sidky; Jerry L Prince; Charles A Pelizzari; Xiaochuan Pan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  How little data is enough? Phase-diagram analysis of sparsity-regularized X-ray computed tomography.

Authors:  J S Jørgensen; E Y Sidky
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2015-06-13       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.