Lin Qiu1, Xiao-Ling Liu1, Si-Run Liu1, Ze-Ping Weng2, Xiao-Qiao Chen1, You-Zhen Feng1, Xiang-Ran Cai3, Chang-Yu Guo4. 1. Medical Imaging Center, First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. 2. Department of Pathology, First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. 3. Medical Imaging Center, First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. caixran@jnu.edu.cn. 4. Serviço de Imagiologia, Centro Hospitalar Conde de São Januário (CHCSJ), Estrada do Visconde de S. Januário, Macau. kuokcu@gmail.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic value of intravoxel incoherent motion imaging (IVIM) in differentiating metastatic and nonmetastatic lymph nodes in patients with rectal carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In all, 68 patients with histologically proven rectal carcinoma underwent an IVIM sequence (b = 0, 25, 50, 75, 100, 150, 200, 400, 600, 800, 1000, 1200, 1500, and 2000 s/mm(2) ) on a 3.0T MRI scanner. The IVIM parameters (D, D*, f, and apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC] values) in metastatic and nonmetastatic lymph nodes were measured and calculated. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were conducted to determine the optimal thresholds, the sensitivities, and specificities for differentiation. RESULTS: Mean D, f, and ADC values of metastatic lymph nodes were significantly greater than those of the normal lymph nodes (P < 0.01), whereas the mean D* value of metastatic lymph node was statistically lower (P = 0.03). The AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and the cutoff value, respectively, for differentiating metastatic from nonmetastatic lymph nodes for D, D*, f, and ADC were as follows: D, 0.9460, 89.25%, 91.04%, and 1.14 × 10(-3) mm(2) /s; D*, 0.6930, 64.18%, 82.80%, and 7.02 × 10(-3) mm(2) /s; f, 0.7810, 92.47%, 55.22%, and 0.27%; ADC, 0.8970, 87.10%, 88.06%, and 0.80 × 10(-3) mm(2) /s. The ROC curves demonstrated that the area under the ROC (AUC) of the D, ADC, f, and D* values successively decreased, and D had the highest AUC, with D* values being lowest. CONCLUSION: An IVIM sequence may be helpful in diagnosing metastatic lymph nodes of rectal carcinoma. Average D and ADC values are more sensitive than f and D* values in this differentiation. J. MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2016;44:1031-1039.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic value of intravoxel incoherent motion imaging (IVIM) in differentiating metastatic and nonmetastatic lymph nodes in patients with rectal carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In all, 68 patients with histologically proven rectal carcinoma underwent an IVIM sequence (b = 0, 25, 50, 75, 100, 150, 200, 400, 600, 800, 1000, 1200, 1500, and 2000 s/mm(2) ) on a 3.0T MRI scanner. The IVIM parameters (D, D*, f, and apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC] values) in metastatic and nonmetastatic lymph nodes were measured and calculated. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were conducted to determine the optimal thresholds, the sensitivities, and specificities for differentiation. RESULTS: Mean D, f, and ADC values of metastatic lymph nodes were significantly greater than those of the normal lymph nodes (P < 0.01), whereas the mean D* value of metastatic lymph node was statistically lower (P = 0.03). The AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and the cutoff value, respectively, for differentiating metastatic from nonmetastatic lymph nodes for D, D*, f, and ADC were as follows: D, 0.9460, 89.25%, 91.04%, and 1.14 × 10(-3) mm(2) /s; D*, 0.6930, 64.18%, 82.80%, and 7.02 × 10(-3) mm(2) /s; f, 0.7810, 92.47%, 55.22%, and 0.27%; ADC, 0.8970, 87.10%, 88.06%, and 0.80 × 10(-3) mm(2) /s. The ROC curves demonstrated that the area under the ROC (AUC) of the D, ADC, f, and D* values successively decreased, and D had the highest AUC, with D* values being lowest. CONCLUSION: An IVIM sequence may be helpful in diagnosing metastatic lymph nodes of rectal carcinoma. Average D and ADC values are more sensitive than f and D* values in this differentiation. J. MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2016;44:1031-1039.
Authors: Alexey Surov; Hans-Jonas Meyer; Maciej Pech; Maciej Powerski; Jasan Omari; Andreas Wienke Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2021-06-29 Impact factor: 2.571