Literature DB >> 34341722

A prospective study of dual-energy computed tomography for differentiating metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes of colorectal cancer.

Lin Qiu1, Junjiao Hu1, Zeping Weng2, Sirun Liu1, Guangyu Jiang2, Xiangran Cai1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common malignancy worldwide, and lymph node metastasis is considered to be a risk factor for local recurrence and a poor prognosis in colorectal cancer. However, there remains a lack of reliable and non-invasive biomarkers to identify the lymph node status of CRC patients preoperatively. The purpose of this study was to explore the ability of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) to differentiate metastatic from non-metastatic lymph nodes in colorectal cancer.
METHODS: Seventy-one patients with primary colorectal cancer underwent contrast-enhanced dual-energy computed tomography imaging preoperatively. The colorectal specimen was scanned postoperatively, and lymph nodes were matched to the pathology report. The following dual-energy computed tomography quantitative parameters were analyzed: dual-energy curve slope value (λHU), standardized iodine concentration (n△HU), iodine water ratio (nIWR), electron density value (nρeff), and effective atom-number (nZ), based on metastatic and non-metastatic lymph node differentiation. Also, sensitivity and specificity analyses were performed using receiver operating characteristic curves.
RESULTS: In all patients, one hundred and fifty lymph nodes, including 66 non-metastatic and 84 metastatic lymph nodes, were matched using the radiological-pathological correlation. Metastatic nodes had significantly greater λHU, n△HU, and nIWR values than non-metastatic nodes in both the arterial and venous phases (P<0.01). The area under curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were 0.80, 80%, and 66% for λHU; 0.86, 70%, and 95% for n△HU; and 0.88, 71%, and 95% for nIWR in the arterial phase. There was no significant difference in electron density and effective Z values between metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes.
CONCLUSIONS: DECT quantitative parameters may help differentiate between metastatic and normal lymph nodes in patients with CRC. 2021 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography; colorectal cancer (CRC); dual-energy CT (DECT); lymph node; staging

Year:  2021        PMID: 34341722      PMCID: PMC8245958          DOI: 10.21037/qims-20-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg        ISSN: 2223-4306


  32 in total

Review 1.  The effects of preoperative chemoradiotherapy on lymph node sampling in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Eric D Miller; Bruce W Robb; Oscar W Cummings; Peter A S Johnstone
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes: quantification and different distribution of iodine uptake assessed by dual-energy CT.

Authors:  Stefania Rizzo; Davide Radice; Marco Femia; Paolo De Marco; Daniela Origgi; Lorenzo Preda; Massimo Barberis; Raffaella Vigorito; Giovanni Mauri; Alberto Mauro; Massimo Bellomi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Angiogenesis is redundant for tumour growth in lymph node metastases.

Authors:  K N Naresh; A Y Nerurkar; A M Borges
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.087

4.  [Motion analysis of target in stereotactic radiotherapy of lung tumors using 320-row multidetector CT].

Authors:  Toshikazu Imae; Akihiro Haga; Keiichi Nakagawa; Kenji Ino; Kenichirou Tanaka; Yukari Okano; Katsutake Sasaki; Shigeki Saegusa; Takashi Shiraki; Takashi Oritate; Keiichi Yano; Hiroyuki Shinohara
Journal:  Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi       Date:  2011

5.  Prognostic factors affecting recurrence and survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  D Koca; C Binicier; I Oztop; T Yavuzsen; H Ellidokuz; U Yilmaz
Journal:  J BUON       Date:  2012 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.533

6.  Dual energy spectral CT imaging for the evaluation of small hepatocellular carcinoma microvascular invasion.

Authors:  Chuang-Bo Yang; Shuang Zhang; Yong-Jun Jia; Yong Yu; Hai-Feng Duan; Xi-Rong Zhang; Guang-Ming Ma; Chenglong Ren; Nan Yu
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2017-08-26       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 7.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery versus surgery alone for colorectal cancer: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Lei Huang; Tuan-Jie Li; Jian-Wen Zhang; Sha Liu; Bin-Sheng Fu; Wei Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Correlation of dual-source computed tomography/dual-energy imaging with pathological grading of lung adenocarcinoma and its clinical value.

Authors:  Haifeng Jiang; Xiao Li
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.088

9.  Gastric cancer staging with dual energy spectral CT imaging.

Authors:  Zilai Pan; Lifang Pang; Bei Ding; Chao Yan; Huan Zhang; Lianjun Du; Baisong Wang; Qi Song; Kemin Chen; Fuhua Yan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Use of Quantitative Morphological and Functional Features for Assessment of Axillary Lymph Node in Breast Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Roberta Fusco; Mario Sansone; Vincenza Granata; Maurizio Di Bonito; Franca Avino; Orlando Catalano; Gerardo Botti; Antonella Petrillo
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  1 in total

1.  Parameters of dual-energy CT for the differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules and the indirect prediction of lymph node metastasis in thyroid carcinoma: a retrospective diagnostic study.

Authors:  Fu Li; Fuling Huang; Chenmin Liu; Denghua Pan; Xiaoqi Tang; Yan Wen; Zhibai Chen; Yuhong Qin; Junqiang Chen
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2022-05
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.