Literature DB >> 27018983

Short-term outcomes after conventional transthoracic esophagectomy.

Yukiko Niwa1, Masahiko Koike1, Masashi Hattori1, Naoki Iwata1, Hideki Takami1, Masamichi Hayashi1, Mitsuro Kanda1, Daisuke Kobayashi1, Chie Tanaka1, Suguru Yamada1, Tsutomu Fujii1, Goro Nakayama1, Hiroyuki Sugimoto1, Shuji Nomoto1, Michitaka Fujiwara1, Yasuhiro Kodera1.   

Abstract

In our department, we have attempted to reduce the incidence of complications of conventional esophagectomy. The objective of this retrospective study was to report the short-term outcomes of esophagectomy. We reviewed 138 consecutive patients who had undergone subtotal esophagectomy by combined laparotomy via a 12-cm upper abdominal vertical incision combined with right anterior muscle-sparing thoracotomy from August 2010 to August 2014. Most of the cervical para-esophageal lymph node dissection was completed within the thoracic cavity. We performed three-field dissection in patients with tumors in the upper or middle third of the esophagus with clinical lymph node metastases in the superior mediastinum; the others underwent two-field dissection. We performed neck anastomoses in patients undergoing three-field dissection and thoracic anastomoses in those undergoing two-field dissection. Effective postoperative pain management was achieved with a combination of epidural anesthesia and paravertebral block. Postoperative rehabilitation was instituted for early ambulation and recovery. Enteral nutrition via a duodenal feeding tube was administered from postoperative day 2. Median hospital stay after surgery was 15 days (range, 10-129). Rates for both 30-day and in-hospital mortality were 0%. Morbidity rate for all Clavien-Dindo grades was 41.3%, whereas the morbidity rate for Clavien-Dindo grades III and IV was 7.2%. Anastomotic leakage developed in two patients (1.4%), recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy in 11 (8.0%), and pneumonia in nine (6.5%). Good short-term outcomes, especially regarding anastomotic leaks, were achieved by consistent improvements in surgical techniques, optimization of several operative procedures, and appropriate perioperative management.

Entities:  

Keywords:  complications; esophageal cancer; esophagectomy; outcomes; transthoracic

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27018983      PMCID: PMC4767515     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nagoya J Med Sci        ISSN: 0027-7622            Impact factor:   1.131


  29 in total

Review 1.  Postoperative mortality following oesophagectomy and problems in reporting its rate.

Authors:  G G Jamieson; G Mathew; R Ludemann; J Wayman; J C Myers; P G Devitt
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Effectiveness of combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy: comparison of postoperative complications and midterm oncological outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Yousuke Kinjo; Noriaki Kurita; Fumiaki Nakamura; Hiroshi Okabe; Eiji Tanaka; Yoshiki Kataoka; Atsushi Itami; Yoshiharu Sakai; Shunichi Fukuhara
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-09-05       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Comparison of the outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  Bernard M Smithers; David C Gotley; Ian Martin; Janine M Thomas
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Comparison of minimally invasive esophagectomy with transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy.

Authors:  N T Nguyen; D M Follette; B M Wolfe; P D Schneider; P Roberts; J E Goodnight
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2000-08

5.  Method of bilateral pleural drainage by single Blake drain after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Yukiko Niwa; Masahiko Koike; Hisaharu Oya; Naoki Iwata; Daisuke Kobayashi; Mitsuro Kanda; Chie Tanaka; Suguru Yamada; Tsutomu Fujii; Goro Nakayama; Hiroyuki Sugimoto; Shuji Nomoto; Michitaka Fujiwara; Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Comparison of the perioperative outcome of esophagectomy by thoracoscopy in the prone position with that of thoracotomy in the lateral decubitus position.

Authors:  Tomoaki Yatabe; Hiroyuki Kitagawa; Koichi Yamashita; Kazuhiro Hanazaki; Masataka Yokoyama
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-10-13       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Esophagectomy using a thoracoscopic approach with an open laparotomic or hand-assisted laparoscopic abdominal stage for esophageal cancer: analysis of survival and prognostic factors in 315 patients.

Authors:  Hirofumi Ichikawa; Go Miyata; Shukichi Miyazaki; Ko Onodera; Takashi Kamei; Tohru Hoshida; Hiroshi Kikuchi; Rikiya Kanba; Toru Nakano; Takashi Akaishi; Susumu Satomi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 8.  Three-field transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy in the management of carcinoma esophagus-a single--center experience with a review of literature.

Authors:  Sivaram Ganesamoni; Arvind Krishnamurthy
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2014-03

9.  Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kamal Nagpal; Kamran Ahmed; Amit Vats; Danny Yakoub; David James; Hutan Ashrafian; Ara Darzi; Krishna Moorthy; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Reporting of short-term clinical outcomes after esophagectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Natalie S Blencowe; Sean Strong; Angus G K McNair; Sara T Brookes; Tom Crosby; S Michael Griffin; Jane M Blazeby
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  2 in total

1.  Feasibility of subtotal esophagectomy with systematic lymphadenectomy in selected elderly patients with esophageal cancer; a propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Mitsuro Kanda; Masahiko Koike; Chie Tanaka; Daisuke Kobayashi; Masamichi Hayashi; Suguru Yamada; Goro Nakayama; Kenji Omae; Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 2.102

2.  Association between the perspective of adult inpatients with digestive cancer regarding the nursing service and their quality of recovery on postoperative day 3.

Authors:  Kumiko Sasaki; Koji Tamakoshi
Journal:  Nagoya J Med Sci       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.131

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.