OBJECTIVE: According to worldview verification theory, inconsistencies between lived experiences and worldviews are psychologically threatening. These inconsistencies may be key determinants of stress processes that influence cardiovascular health disparities. This preliminary examination considers how experiencing injustice can affect perceived racism and biological stress reactivity among African Americans. Guided by worldview verification theory, it was hypothesized that responses to receiving an unfair outcome would be moderated by fairness of the accompanying decision process, and that this effect would further depend on the consistency of the decision process with preexisting justice beliefs. METHOD: A sample of 118 healthy African American adults completed baseline measures of justice beliefs, followed by a laboratory-based social-evaluative stressor task. Two randomized fairness manipulations were implemented during the task: participants were given either high or low levels of distributive (outcome) and procedural (decision process) justice. Glucocorticoid (cortisol) and inflammatory (C-reactive protein) biological responses were measured in oral fluids, and attributions of racism were also measured. RESULTS: The hypothesized 3-way interaction was generally obtained. Among African Americans with a strong belief in justice, perceived racism, cortisol, and C-reactive protein responses to low distributive justice were higher when procedural justice was low. Among African Americans with a weak belief in justice however, these responses were higher when a low level of distributive justice was coupled with high procedural justice. CONCLUSIONS: Biological and psychological processes that contribute to cardiovascular health disparities are affected by consistency between individual-level and contextual justice factors. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: According to worldview verification theory, inconsistencies between lived experiences and worldviews are psychologically threatening. These inconsistencies may be key determinants of stress processes that influence cardiovascular health disparities. This preliminary examination considers how experiencing injustice can affect perceived racism and biological stress reactivity among African Americans. Guided by worldview verification theory, it was hypothesized that responses to receiving an unfair outcome would be moderated by fairness of the accompanying decision process, and that this effect would further depend on the consistency of the decision process with preexisting justice beliefs. METHOD: A sample of 118 healthy African American adults completed baseline measures of justice beliefs, followed by a laboratory-based social-evaluative stressor task. Two randomized fairness manipulations were implemented during the task: participants were given either high or low levels of distributive (outcome) and procedural (decision process) justice. Glucocorticoid (cortisol) and inflammatory (C-reactive protein) biological responses were measured in oral fluids, and attributions of racism were also measured. RESULTS: The hypothesized 3-way interaction was generally obtained. Among African Americans with a strong belief in justice, perceived racism, cortisol, and C-reactive protein responses to low distributive justice were higher when procedural justice was low. Among African Americans with a weak belief in justice however, these responses were higher when a low level of distributive justice was coupled with high procedural justice. CONCLUSIONS: Biological and psychological processes that contribute to cardiovascular health disparities are affected by consistency between individual-level and contextual justice factors. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).
Authors: Roberto De Vogli; Jane E Ferrie; Tarani Chandola; Mika Kivimäki; Michael G Marmot Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Mika Kivimäki; Jane E Ferrie; Eric Brunner; Jenny Head; Martin J Shipley; Jussi Vahtera; Michael G Marmot Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2005-10-24
Authors: E R Landau; J Trinder; J G Simmons; M Raniti; M Blake; J M Waloszek; L Blake; O Schwartz; G Murray; N B Allen; M L Byrne Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2018-09-08 Impact factor: 4.905
Authors: Sarah R Horn; Madison M Long; Benjamin W Nelson; Nicholas B Allen; Philip A Fisher; Michelle L Byrne Journal: Brain Behav Immun Date: 2018-06-19 Impact factor: 7.217
Authors: Heidemarie K Laurent; Todd Lucas; Jennifer Pierce; Stefan Goetz; Douglas A Granger Journal: Biol Psychol Date: 2016-05-04 Impact factor: 3.251
Authors: Amani M Allen; Yijie Wang; David H Chae; Melisa M Price; Wizdom Powell; Teneka C Steed; Angela Rose Black; Firdaus S Dhabhar; Leticia Marquez-Magaña; Cheryl L Woods-Giscombe Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2019-08-12 Impact factor: 5.691
Authors: Todd Lucas; Jacqueline Woerner; Jennifer Pierce; Douglas A Granger; Jue Lin; Elissa S Epel; Shervin Assari; Mark A Lumley Journal: Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol Date: 2018-07-30
Authors: Amani M Allen; Marilyn D Thomas; Eli K Michaels; Alexis N Reeves; Uche Okoye; Melisa M Price; Rebecca E Hasson; S Leonard Syme; David H Chae Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2018-09-05 Impact factor: 4.905