Natalia V Arteyeva1, Jan E Azarov1,2,3. 1. Laboratory of Cardiac Physiology, Institute of Physiology, Komi Science Center, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Syktyvkar, Russia. 2. Department of Physiology, Medical Institute of Syktyvkar State University, Syktyvkar, Russia. 3. Department of Cardiology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The changes in ventricular repolarization gradients lead to significant alterations of the electrocardiographic body surface T waves up to the T wave inversion. However, the contribution of a specific gradient remains to be elucidated. The objective of the present investigation was to study the role of the transmural repolarization gradient in the inversion of the body surface T wave with a mathematical model of the hypothermia-induced changes of ventricular repolarization. METHODS: By means of mathematical simulation, we set the hypothermic action potential duration (APD) distribution on the rabbit ventricular epicardium as it was previously experimentally documented. Then the parameters of the body surface potential distribution were tested with the introduction of different scenarios of the endocardial and epicardial APD behavior in hypothermia resulting in the unchanged, reversed or enlarged transmural repolarization gradient. RESULTS: The reversal of epicardial repolarization gradients (apicobasal, anterior-posterior and interventricular) caused the inversion of the T waves regardless of the direction of the transmural repolarization gradient. However, the most realistic body surface potentials were obtained when the endocardial APDs were not changed under hypothermia while the epicardial APDs prolonged. This produced the reversed and increased transmural repolarization gradient in absolute magnitude. The body surface potentials simulated under the unchanged transmural gradient were reduced in comparison to those simulated under the reversed transmural gradient. CONCLUSIONS: The simulations demonstrated that the transmural repolarization gradient did not play a crucial role in the cardiac electric field inversion under hypothermia, but its magnitude and direction contribute to the T wave amplitude.
BACKGROUND: The changes in ventricular repolarization gradients lead to significant alterations of the electrocardiographic body surface T waves up to the T wave inversion. However, the contribution of a specific gradient remains to be elucidated. The objective of the present investigation was to study the role of the transmural repolarization gradient in the inversion of the body surface T wave with a mathematical model of the hypothermia-induced changes of ventricular repolarization. METHODS: By means of mathematical simulation, we set the hypothermic action potential duration (APD) distribution on the rabbit ventricular epicardium as it was previously experimentally documented. Then the parameters of the body surface potential distribution were tested with the introduction of different scenarios of the endocardial and epicardial APD behavior in hypothermia resulting in the unchanged, reversed or enlarged transmural repolarization gradient. RESULTS: The reversal of epicardial repolarization gradients (apicobasal, anterior-posterior and interventricular) caused the inversion of the T waves regardless of the direction of the transmural repolarization gradient. However, the most realistic body surface potentials were obtained when the endocardial APDs were not changed under hypothermia while the epicardial APDs prolonged. This produced the reversed and increased transmural repolarization gradient in absolute magnitude. The body surface potentials simulated under the unchanged transmural gradient were reduced in comparison to those simulated under the reversed transmural gradient. CONCLUSIONS: The simulations demonstrated that the transmural repolarization gradient did not play a crucial role in the cardiac electric field inversion under hypothermia, but its magnitude and direction contribute to the T wave amplitude.
Authors: Gan-Xin Yan; Ramarao S Lankipalli; James F Burke; Simone Musco; Peter R Kowey Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2003-08-06 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Pablo A Chiale; Julio D Pastori; Hugo A Garro; Luciano Faivelis; Oscar Ianovsky; Rubén A Sánchez; Carlos B Alvarez; Mario D González; Marcelo V Elizari Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2010-03-24 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Martina Perazzolo Marra; Alessandro Zorzi; Francesco Corbetti; Manuel De Lazzari; Federico Migliore; Francesco Tona; Giuseppe Tarantini; Sabino Iliceto; Domenico Corrado Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2012-09-11 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Natalia V Arteyeva; Sergey L Goshka; Ksenia A Sedova; Olesya G Bernikova; Jan E Azarov Journal: J Electrocardiol Date: 2013-03-06 Impact factor: 1.438
Authors: Maciej Kubala; Shuanglun Xie; Pasquale Santangeli; Fermin C Garcia; Gregory E Supple; Robert D Schaller; Jackson J Liang; Rajeev K Pathak; Erica S Zado; Cory Tschabrunn; Jeffrey Arkles; David J Callans; Francis E Marchlinski Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2019-08-23 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Yali Zhao; Nicholas A James; Ashraf R Beshay; Eileen E Chang; Andrew Lin; Faiza Bashar; Abram Wassily; Binh Nguyen; Thao P Nguyen Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2021-07-07 Impact factor: 10.787