Literature DB >> 27017367

Changes in the Pacemaker Rate After Transition From Edwards SAPIEN XT to SAPIEN 3 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: The Critical Role of Valve Implantation Height.

Fernando De Torres-Alba1, Gerrit Kaleschke1, Gerhard Paul Diller1, Julia Vormbrock1, Stefan Orwat1, Robert Radke1, Florian Reinke1, Dieter Fischer1, Holger Reinecke1, Helmut Baumgartner2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyze the pacemaker implantation rate (PMIR) with the new balloon-expandable Edwards SAPIEN 3 valve (S3) and the factors associated with it.
BACKGROUND: The introduction of the S3 for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has led to a reduction in paravalvular regurgitation. There are, however, concerns that the new design may increase the PMIR.
METHODS: The first 206 patients treated with the S3 were compared with 371 preceding patients treated with SAPIEN XT valves. Patients who previously underwent pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation or transapical and valve-in-valve procedures were excluded from the analysis. All patients were monitored for at least 7 days. Previous and new conduction abnormalities were documented, and prosthesis implantation height was assessed for the S3.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between groups. The PMIR was, however, significantly higher for the S3 (19.1% vs. 12.2%; p = 0.046). The mean implantation height was significantly lower in patients requiring PMI (67%/33% vs. 72%/28% aortic/ventricular stent extension, p = 0.032). On multivariate regression analysis, implantation height was the only independent predictor of PMI (odds ratio: 0.94 [95% confidence interval: 0.90 to 0.99]; p = 0.009). It increased from 68%/32% to 75%/25% when comparing the first with the second half of S3 implantations (p < 0.0001). This change was associated with a significant decrease in PMIR from 25.9% to 12.3% (p = 0.028), no longer different from the XT valve (12.2%).
CONCLUSIONS: The PMIR after TAVR is higher with the S3 than with the XT and is independently associated with the implantation height. This increase in the PMIR may be avoided by intending an aortic stent extension >70%.
Copyright © 2016 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Edwards SAPIEN 3; balloon-expandable valve; conduction abnormalities; pacemaker; transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27017367     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.12.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


  26 in total

Review 1.  A Disruptive Technology: Determining Need for Permanent Pacing After TAVR.

Authors:  Amneet Sandhu; Wendy S Tzou
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Transcatheter aortic valve replacement: favorable clinical outcomes support role in intermediate risk surgical patients.

Authors:  Ravilla Mahidhar; Jon R Resar
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Head to head transcatheter heart valve comparisons: when theory becomes reality.

Authors:  Gabriela Tirado-Conte; German Armijo; Luis Nombela-Franco
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-08

4.  The value of electrophysiologic study in decision-making regarding the need for pacemaker implantation after TAVI.

Authors:  Oholi Tovia-Brodie; Yael Ben-Haim; Erel Joffe; Ariel Finkelstein; Aharon Glick; Raphael Rosso; Bernard Belhassen; Yoav Michowitz
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-12-17       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 5.  Future of transcatheter aortic valve implantation - evolving clinical indications.

Authors:  Rishi Puri; Chekrallah Chamandi; Tania Rodriguez-Gabella; Josep Rodés-Cabau
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 6.  Permanent pacemaker insertion in patients with conduction abnormalities post transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a review and proposed guidelines.

Authors:  Tamunoinemi Bob-Manuel; Amit Nanda; Samuel Latham; Issa Pour-Ghaz; William Paul Skelton; Rami N Khouzam
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-01

7.  Predictors for permanent pacemaker implantation in patients undergoing transfemoral aortic valve implantation with the Edwards Sapien 3 valve.

Authors:  Birgid Gonska; Julia Seeger; Mirjam Keßler; Alexander von Keil; Wolfgang Rottbauer; Jochen Wöhrle
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 5.460

8.  Effect of new and persistent left bundle branch block after transcatheter aortic valve replacement on long-term need for pacemaker implantation.

Authors:  Mohanad Hamandi; Deborah Tabachnick; Allison T Lanfear; Ronald Baxter; Kathryn Shin; Brittany Zingler; Michael J Mack; J Michael DiMaio; Steven Kindsvater
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2020-01-30

9.  Outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in bicuspid aortic valve stenosis.

Authors:  Tamunoinemi Bob-Manuel; Mark R Heckle; Ikechukwu A Ifedili; Jiajing Wang; Uzoma N Ibebuogu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-03

10.  Overcoming the transcatheter aortic valve replacement Achilles heel: conduction abnormalities-a systematic review.

Authors:  Alberto Alperi; Guillem Muntané-Carol; Afonso B Freitas-Ferraz; Lucia Junquera; David Del Val; Laurent Faroux; François Philippon; Josep Rodés-Cabau
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.