Literature DB >> 27017336

Effects of Phonetic Similarity in the Identification of Mandarin Tones.

Bin Li1, Jing Shao2,3, Mingzhen Bao4.   

Abstract

Tonal languages differ in how they use phonetic correlates e.g. average pitch height and pitch direction, for tonal contrasts. Thus, native speakers of a tonal language may need to adjust their attention to familiar or unfamiliar phonetic cues when perceiving non-native tones. On the other hand, speakers of a non-tonal language may need to develop sensitivity to tonal correlates absent from their native system. The current study examines and compares five language groups' perception of two synthesized Mandarin tones: the high level tone and the high falling tone. It aims to examine how listeners from tonal and non-tonal backgrounds identify and categorize acoustically equidistant pitches varying along two phonetic dimensions: pitch onset and slope. Results reveal "universal" perceptual patterns across groups and also tendencies caused by native tonal systems. Our findings confirm that L1 tonal and prosodic systems affect speakers' sensitivity to novel perceptual cues and their abilities to discern relevant phonetic differences.

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27017336     DOI: 10.1007/s10936-016-9422-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res        ISSN: 0090-6905


  11 in total

1.  Discrimination of non-native consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the listener's native phonological system.

Authors:  C T Best; G W McRoberts; E Goodell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Selective attention and the acquisition of new phonetic categories.

Authors:  Alexander L Francis; Howard C Nusbaum
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Acoustic and perceptual evaluation of Mandarin tone productions before and after perceptual training.

Authors:  Yue Wang; Allard Jongman; Joan A Sereno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Categorical perception of lexical tones in Chinese revealed by mismatch negativity.

Authors:  J Xi; L Zhang; H Shu; Y Zhang; P Li
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 3.590

5.  Effect of intonation on cantonese lexical tones.

Authors:  Joan K-Y Ma; Valter Ciocca; Tara L Whitehill
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Learning English vowels with different first-language vowel systems: perception of formant targets, formant movement, and duration.

Authors:  Paul Iverson; Bronwen G Evans
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 7.  Perceptual learning.

Authors:  R L Goldstone
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 24.137

8.  Tone in Thai alaryngeal speech.

Authors:  J Gandour; B Weinberg; S H Petty; R Dardarananda
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1988-02

9.  Mapping the perceptual magnet effect for speech using signal detection theory and multidimensional scaling.

Authors:  P Iverson; P K Kuhl
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Cross-language perception of non-native tonal contrasts: effects of native phonological and phonetic influences.

Authors:  Connie K So; Catherine T Best
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.500

View more
  1 in total

1.  The effect of overnight consolidation in the perceptual learning of non-native tonal contrasts.

Authors:  Zhen Qin; Caicai Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.