Literature DB >> 27017201

Lower Limb Anatomy and Alignment Affect Natural Tibiofemoral Knee Kinematics: A Cadaveric Investigation.

Guenther Maderbacher1, Clemens Baier1, Hans R Springorum1, Florian Zeman2, Joachim Grifka1, Armin Keshmiri1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: During flexion, normal knee kinematics consists of a complex combination of rolling, gliding, and rotation between femur and tibia. Although in vivo studies have shown wide interindividual variability, we hypothesized that knee kinematics is either correlated to the anatomy of the individual knee joint or to the anatomic alignment of the entire lower extremity.
METHODS: The passive kinematics of 10 healthy knees was assessed in whole cadavers using a commercial computed tomography-free navigation device with intracortical pins. Rotational limb alignment or local anatomic parameters obtained by computed tomography scan or within a navigational procedure were correlated to tibial internal rotation and tibiofemoral abduction during flexion.
RESULTS: Mean tibial adduction in full extension was 3.3° (range -2.2° to 7.8°). Tibial abduction and internal rotation showed significant interindividual variability, measuring 3.9° (range -0.8° to 9.7°) and 4.9° (range -3.5° to 14.8°) during flexion. An increase in both the mechanical tibiofemoral axis and the mechanical lateral distal femoral angle correlated with increased tibial internal rotation, whereas a decrease in the mechanical medial proximal tibial angle and an increase in the mechanical tibiofemoral axis were associated with increased tibial adduction.
CONCLUSION: The main finding of the present study is that knee kinematics is influenced by both intra-articular and extra-articular parameters. These results may be of interest in component alignment in total knee arthroplasty, correction of deformities, and malalignment after fracture healing of the lower extremity. Possible relationships should be investigated in future studies.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomechanics; constitutional varus; kinematics; knee; rotational alignment; total knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27017201     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.02.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  4 in total

1.  The effect of articular geometry features identified using statistical shape modelling on knee biomechanics.

Authors:  Allison L Clouthier; Colin R Smith; Michael F Vignos; Darryl G Thelen; Kevin J Deluzio; Michael J Rainbow
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 2.242

2.  [Effects of femoral offset and mechanical axis of the lower extremity on hip after osteotomy for adult developmental dysplasia of the hip].

Authors:  Yong Li; Zhendong Zhang; Ningtao Ren; Hui Cheng; Dianzhong Luo; Hong Zhang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-12-15

3.  Increased lateral and medial femoral posterior radius ratios are risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  Chunxu Fu; Xuguo Fan; Shigang Jiang; Junsen Wang; Tong Li; Kai Kang; Shijun Gao
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  The Presence of Cartilage Affects Femoral Rotational Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yiming Yang; Xianli Zeng; Yan Jin; Zhemin Zhu; Tsung-Yuan Tsai; Jiarong Chen; Hongyuan Shen; Pingyue Li
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-02-16
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.