| Literature DB >> 27016421 |
Joo Hoon Kim1, Jae Seok Lee2, Eo Jin Kim2, Kyu Hyun Park3, Ki Hyang Kim4, Seong Yoon Yi5, Han Seong Kim6, Yong Jin Cho7, Kyoo-Ho Shin7, Joong Bae Ahn1, Hyuk Hu8, Kyung Sik Kim8, Young Deuk Choi9, Sunghoon Kim10, Young Han Lee11, Jin-Suck Suh11, Sung Hoon Noh8, Sun Young Rha1, Hyo Song Kim1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We investigated the epidemiologic characteristics and prognostic significance of PIK3CA mutations/amplifications in curative resected liposarcoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 125 liposarcoma tissue samples were collected over a 12-year period. PIK3CA mutations and gene copy number amplifications were analyzed by pyrosequencing and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).Entities:
Keywords: PIK3CA; amplification; liposarcoma; mutation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27016421 PMCID: PMC5029721 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.8240
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Patient characteristics based on PIK3CA amplification
| Characteristics | All patients | Copy number gain | Normal copy number | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | ||
| 125 | 100 | 14 | 13.9 | 87 | 86.1 | ||
| 52 (18-84) | 61 (37-84) | 50 (20-83) | |||||
| 0.487 | |||||||
| | 78 | 62.4 | 8 | 57.1 | 58 | 66.7 | |
| | 47 | 37.6 | 6 | 42.9 | 29 | 33.3 | |
| 14.1 (1.0-37.0) | 18.5 (5.5-37.0) | 12.25 (1.0-31.0) | |||||
| 0-5 cm | 19 | 15.2 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 18.4 | |
| 5-10 cm | 26 | 20.8 | 3 | 21.4 | 18 | 20.7 | |
| 10-15 cm | 26 | 20.8 | 1 | 7.1 | 20 | 30.0 | |
| >15 cm | 46 | 36.8 | 8 | 57.1 | 28 | 32.2 | |
| unknown | 8 | 6.4 | 2 | 14.3 | 5 | 5.7 | |
| 0.063 | |||||||
| | |||||||
| Well differentiated | 45 | 36.0 | 7 | 50.0 | 30 | 34.5 | |
| Dedifferentiated | 9 | 7.2 | 2 | 14.3 | 3 | 3.4 | |
| | |||||||
| Myxoid | 52 | 41.6 | 2 | 14.3 | 44 | 50.6 | |
| Round cell | 9 | 7.2 | 1 | 7.1 | 5 | 5.7 | |
| Pleomorphic | 10 | 8.0 | 2 | 14.3 | 5 | 5.7 | |
| 0.051 | |||||||
| | |||||||
| Lower extremity | 55 | 44.0 | 4 | 28.6 | 43 | 49.4 | |
| Upper extremity | 6 | 4.8 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3.4 | |
| | |||||||
| Retroperitoneum | 27 | 21.6 | 5 | 35.7 | 15 | 17.2 | |
| Intraabdomen | 8 | 6.4 | 3 | 21.4 | 3 | 3.4 | |
| | |||||||
| | |||||||
| 22.0 (3.7-240.9) | 13.8 (6.2-95.2) | 34.4 (3.7-240.9) | |||||
Abbreviations: PIK3CA, phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-Kinase, Catalytic Subunit Alpha;CEN3, centromere3
PIK3CA amplification was defined as if one of the following criteria is fulfilled: (1) PIK3CA/CEN3 ratio is ≥ 2.0, (2) average number of PIK3CA signal per nucleus > 4.0
PIK3CA polysomy were defined as average number of PIK3CA signal per nucleus 4.0 ≥ to > 2.0.
χ2 test, Fisher's exact test, t-test or Mann-Whitney U test.
PIK3CA amplification status according to liposarcoma histologic subtype
| Histologic classification | Normal Copy Number | Copy Number Gain | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polysomy | Amplification | Total, n (%) | ||
| Well- differentiated | 30 | 6 | 3 | |
| De-differentiated | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| Myxoid/ Round cell | 49 | 3 | 0 | |
| Pleomorphic | 5 | 2 | 0 | |
Figure 1Representative fluorescent in situ hybridization of tumors with A. normal copy numbers, B. polysomy, C. and PIK3CA amplification
Figure 2Survival analysis based on PIK3CA status
. A. The median disease-free survival (DFS) was 22.0 months in patients with PIK3CA copy number gain and 107.6 months in the normal group. B. The median overall survival (OS) was not significantly different between the two groups.
Prognostic factors for disease-free survival and overall survival
| Variable | Category | DFS | OS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95% CI | HR | 95% CI | ||||
| Copy number gain | 2.400 | 1.105-5.213 | 1.628 | 0.555-4.770 | 0.375 | ||
| Age ≥52 years | 2.393 | 1.203-4.760 | 3.875 | 1.351-11.118 | |||
| Female | 0.650 | 0.357-1.186 | 0.161 | 1.078 | 0.431-2.697 | 0.873 | |
| Mixoid/Round cell, Pleomorphic | 1.692 | 0.896 −3.196 | 0.105 | 1.336 | 0.538-3.316 | 0.533 | |
| Extremity, Inguinal/genital, other area | 0.880 | 0.439-1.762 | 0.718 | 1.335 | 0.420-4.242 | 0.624 | |
Abbreviations: DFS, disease-free survival; OS, overall survival; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; ref, reference; diff, differentiated
PIK3CA mutational status according to liposarcoma histologic subtype
| Histologic classification | Wild type | Mutation | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exon 9 | Exon 20 | Total, n (%) | |||||
| E542K | E545K | Q546K | H1047R | H1047L | |||
| 44 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
| Well- differentiated | 1 | 0 | 1 | ||||
| De-differentiated | 0 | 0 | |||||
| 52 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | ||
| Myxoid and Round cell | 43 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| Pleomorphic | 9 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 96 (91.4) | 5 (4.8) | 4 (3.8) | |||||
| 9 (8.6) | |||||||
Figure 3PIK3CA mutations in liposarcoma detected by pyrosequencing
A. Wild-type and exon 9 E545K (G1633A) mutations. B. Wild-type and exon 20 H1047R (A3140G) mutations.