Literature DB >> 27016421

Prognostic implications of PIK3CA amplification in curatively resected liposarcoma.

Joo Hoon Kim1, Jae Seok Lee2, Eo Jin Kim2, Kyu Hyun Park3, Ki Hyang Kim4, Seong Yoon Yi5, Han Seong Kim6, Yong Jin Cho7, Kyoo-Ho Shin7, Joong Bae Ahn1, Hyuk Hu8, Kyung Sik Kim8, Young Deuk Choi9, Sunghoon Kim10, Young Han Lee11, Jin-Suck Suh11, Sung Hoon Noh8, Sun Young Rha1, Hyo Song Kim1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We investigated the epidemiologic characteristics and prognostic significance of PIK3CA mutations/amplifications in curative resected liposarcoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 125 liposarcoma tissue samples were collected over a 12-year period. PIK3CA mutations and gene copy number amplifications were analyzed by pyrosequencing and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).
RESULTS: Nine of the 105 liposarcomas (8.6%) had activating PIK3CA mutation. PIK3CA mutations were more frequent in myxoid/round cell and pleomorphic tumors compared with well-differentiated/dedifferentiated tumors (13.3% vs. 2.2%, P=0.043). In FISH PIK3CA analysis, copy number gain was detected in 14 of the 101 tumors (13.9%): 11 (10.9%) tumors had increased gene copy number (polysomy) and 3 (3.0%) exhibited gene amplification. In survival analysis, patients with PIK3CA copy number gain had a worse prognosis compared to patients without PIK3CA amplification (median disease-free survival [DFS] 22.2 vs. 107.6 months p=0.005). By multivariate analysis, PIK3CA copy number gain was an independent prognostic factor for worse DFS (P=0.027; hazard ratio, 2.400; 95% confidence interval 1.105 to 5.213). PIK3CA mutation was not associated with DFS and overall survival.
CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated PIK3CA mutation and amplification in liposarcoma. PIK3CA copy number gain was an independent poor prognostic factor for DFS. Further studies are needed to evaluate the potential diagnostic and therapeutic role of PIK3CA mutations and amplifications in liposarcoma.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PIK3CA; amplification; liposarcoma; mutation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27016421      PMCID: PMC5029721          DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.8240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncotarget        ISSN: 1949-2553


INTRODUCTION

Soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is a heterogeneous disease with over 50 histologic subtypes, with various biological behaviors and genetic features [1]. In adults, liposarcoma is the most common type STS, representing 17–25% of the total cases [2]. Although surgical resection is the primary treatment for localized disease, many liposarcomas eventually progress to advanced disease that is either unresectable, metastatic, or both. For patients with those tumors, the mortality is high, and local and/or systemic tumor burden also results in significant morbidity [3]. For prognostic reasons, liposarcoma is subdivided into 5 subtypes by the World Health Organization classification: well-differentiated, myxoid/round cell, dedifferentiated, pleomorphic, and mixed-type liposarcoma [4]. Well-differentiated and myxoid liposarcoma are low-grade tumors, while dedifferentiated, round cell, and pleomorphic liposarcoma are high-grade tumors. Low-grade tumors have a low frequency of metastasis, and high-grade tumors often manifest with clinically aggressive behavior and distant metastasis. Besides the recognition of specific histologic subtypes, better understanding of distinct genetic and molecular aberrations is critical for therapeutic strategy. The phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K)-Akt-mTOR signaling pathway plays a central role in regulating tumor cell metabolism and survival [5]. Activation of the PI3K pathway occurs upon engagement with mutated or amplified phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-Kinase, catalytic subunit Alpha (PIK3CA) gene It increases p110α expression, PI3K activation, and phosphorylation of downstream signaling molecules. Akt-PIK3CA gene amplification was found in 10–30% of non-small cell lung cancer, breast cancer, and colon cancer [6-8]. Activating somatic mutations were also identified in various solid tumors [9, 10]. Recently, PIK3CA mutation was reported in 12% and 18% of myxoid/round-cell liposarcoma, and it was associated with Akt activation and poor clinical outcome [11, 12]. Despite accumulating evidence of biological role, there have been few studies reporting the frequency of PIK3CA aberration (including mutations and amplifications) for all liposarcoma subtypes. In this study, we evaluated the frequency of PIK3CA amplification and mutation in surgically resected liposarcoma. Furthermore, we also determined the prognostic impact of PIK3CA genetic aberration for liposarcoma patients.

RESULTS

Clinical and pathological features

A total of Korean 125 patients with liposarcoma who underwent curative resection were analyzed. The clinical characteristics such as gender, age, primary tumor site, histology, and tumor size are presented in Table 1. The median age at diagnosis was 52 years (range: 18–84 years), and male was predominant (62.4%). The median tumor size was 14.1 cm, and one-third of all tumors were over 15 cm. Primary tumors mainly occurred in the extremities (n=61, 48.8%), with the other sites being the retroperitoneum/intra-abdominal region (n=35, 28.0%), inguinal area/genital organ (n=10, 8.0%), and other sites (n=19, 15.2%). The distribution of histologic subtypes were as follows: myxoid in 52 patients (41.6%), well-differentiated in 45 patients (36.0%), pleomorphic in 10 patients (8.0%), dedifferentiated in 9 patients (7.2%), and round cell in 9 patients (7.2%).
Table 1

Patient characteristics based on PIK3CA amplification

CharacteristicsAll patientsCopy number gain(Polysomy + Amplification)*Normal copy numberP[]
No.%No.%No.%
Number of patients1251001413.98786.1
Age, yearsMedian (range)52 (18-84)61 (37-84)50 (20-83)0.023
Gender0.487
Male7862.4857.15866.7
Female4737.6642.92933.3
Tumor size, cmMedian (range)14.1 (1.0-37.0)18.5 (5.5-37.0)12.25 (1.0-31.0)0.040
 0-5 cm1915.2001618.4
 5-10 cm2620.8321.41820.7
 10-15 cm2620.817.12030.0
 >15 cm4636.8857.12832.2
 unknown86.4214.355.7
Histologic classification0.063
Well- and De-differentiated5443.2964.33337.9
  Well differentiated4536.0750.03034.5
  Dedifferentiated97.2214.333.4
Mixoid/Round cell, Pleomorphic7158.8535.75462.1
  Myxoid5241.6214.34450.6
  Round cell97.217.155.7
  Pleomorphic108.0214.355.7
Primary tumor site0.051
Extremity6148.8428.64652.9
  Lower extremity5544.0428.64349.4
  Upper extremity64.80033.4
Retroperitoneum/intraabdomen3528.0857.11820.7
  Retroperitoneum2721.6535.71517.2
  Intraabdomen86.4321.433.4
Inguinal area & genital organ108.017.189.2
Other area1915.217.11517.2
Time to recurrence, monthsMedian (range)22.0 (3.7-240.9)13.8 (6.2-95.2)34.4 (3.7-240.9)

Abbreviations: PIK3CA, phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-Kinase, Catalytic Subunit Alpha;CEN3, centromere3

PIK3CA amplification was defined as if one of the following criteria is fulfilled: (1) PIK3CA/CEN3 ratio is ≥ 2.0, (2) average number of PIK3CA signal per nucleus > 4.0

PIK3CA polysomy were defined as average number of PIK3CA signal per nucleus 4.0 ≥ to > 2.0.

χ2 test, Fisher's exact test, t-test or Mann-Whitney U test.

Abbreviations: PIK3CA, phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-Kinase, Catalytic Subunit Alpha;CEN3, centromere3 PIK3CA amplification was defined as if one of the following criteria is fulfilled: (1) PIK3CA/CEN3 ratio is ≥ 2.0, (2) average number of PIK3CA signal per nucleus > 4.0 PIK3CA polysomy were defined as average number of PIK3CA signal per nucleus 4.0 ≥ to > 2.0. χ2 test, Fisher's exact test, t-test or Mann-Whitney U test.

PIK3CA amplification

Of the 125 cases, 101 tumor samples were evaluable for PIK3CA FISH analysis. Based on PIK3CA gene expression values, tumors were categorized into three groups: (I) normal copy number, tumors with ≤2 copies per cell with a PIK3CA/CEN3 ratio < 2.0; (II) polysomy, tumors with an average PIK3CA signal per nucleus 4.0 ≥ to > 2.0; and (III) amplification, tumors with >4 copies per cell and/or a PIK3CA/CEN3 ratio ≥ 2.0. By these criteria, of the 101 cases, 14 tumors (13.9%) demonstrated copy number gain, 11 (10.9%) had polysomy, and 3 (3.0%) had gene amplification (Table 2, Figure 1). The median PIK3CA gene copy numbers were 2.3 (range, 2.1–2.6) and 6.5 (range, 5.0–10.3) in PIK3CA the polysomy and amplification groups, respectively. We also analyzed the association between PIK3CA amplification status and clinical parameters. PIK3CA copy number gain was significantly associated with older age and larger tumor size (Table 1, P=0.023 and P=0.040, respectively). There were no significant differences in PIK3CA copy number change with respect to sex, histology, and primary tumor site.
Table 2

PIK3CA amplification status according to liposarcoma histologic subtype

Histologic classificationNormal Copy NumberCopy Number Gain
PolysomyAmplificationTotal, n (%)
Well- and De-differentiated33639 (21.4)
 Well- differentiated3063
 De-differentiated300
Myxoid/Round cell, Pleomorphic54505 (8.5)
 Myxoid/ Round cell4930
 Pleomorphic520
Total, n (%)87 (86.1)11 (10.9)3 (3.0)
14 (13.9)
Figure 1

Representative fluorescent in situ hybridization of tumors with A. normal copy numbers, B. polysomy, C. and PIK3CA amplification

With a median follow-up time of 50.6 months, the 5-year DFS and OS rates were 57.9% and 82.8%, respectively. The PIK3CA copy number gain group (polysomy and amplification) had a significantly shorter DFS compared with that of normal group (Figure 2A, median 22.0 vs. 107.6 months, P=0.005). Using the Cox proportional hazard model adjusted for gender, age, histology, and tumor location, PIK3CA copy number gain was an independent poor prognostic factor for DFS (Table 3, P=0.027; hazard ratio [HR], 2.400; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.105 to 5.213). Older age (p=0.013; HR, 2.393; 95% CI 1.203 to 4.760) was also an independent poor prognostic factor for DFS. There was no significant difference in OS with respect to PIK3CA copy number gain (P=0.144, Figure 2B)
Figure 2

Survival analysis based on PIK3CA status

. A. The median disease-free survival (DFS) was 22.0 months in patients with PIK3CA copy number gain and 107.6 months in the normal group. B. The median overall survival (OS) was not significantly different between the two groups.

Table 3

Prognostic factors for disease-free survival and overall survival

VariableCategoryDFSOS
HR95% CIPHR95% CIP
PIK3CA copy number statusCopy number gain vsNormal copy number (ref)2.4001.105-5.2130.0271.6280.555-4.7700.375
AgeAge ≥52 years vsAge < 52 years (ref)2.3931.203-4.7600.0133.8751.351-11.1180.012
GenderFemale vsMale (ref)0.6500.357-1.1860.1611.0780.431-2.6970.873
HistologyMixoid/Round cell, Pleomorphic vsWell/De-diff (ref)1.6920.896 −3.1960.1051.3360.538-3.3160.533
Primary tumor sitesExtremity, Inguinal/genital, other areavs Retroperitoneum/Intraabdomen (ref)0.8800.439-1.7620.7181.3350.420-4.2420.624

Abbreviations: DFS, disease-free survival; OS, overall survival; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; ref, reference; diff, differentiated

Survival analysis based on PIK3CA status

. A. The median disease-free survival (DFS) was 22.0 months in patients with PIK3CA copy number gain and 107.6 months in the normal group. B. The median overall survival (OS) was not significantly different between the two groups. Abbreviations: DFS, disease-free survival; OS, overall survival; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; ref, reference; diff, differentiated

PIK3CA mutation

Among the 125 patients, 105 tumor samples were available for PIK3CA mutation analysis. Activating PIK3CA mutation was detected in 9 (8.6%) of 105 cases, with 5 cases of exon 9 mutation and 4 cases of exon 20 mutation (Table 4). For PIK3CA exon 9, E542K mutations were identified in 2 tumors, Q546K mutations were identified in 2 tumors, and an E545K mutation was identified in 1 tumor. For exon 20, H1047R mutations were identified in 3 tumors, and an H1047L was identified in 1 tumor (Figure 3). There was no co-occurrence of exon 9 and exon 20 mutations.
Table 4

PIK3CA mutational status according to liposarcoma histologic subtype

Histologic classificationWild typeMutation
Exon 9Exon 20Total, n (%)
E542KE545KQ546KH1047RH1047L
Well- and De-differentiated44000101 (2.2)
 Well- differentiated101
 De-differentiated00
Myxoid and Round cell, Pleomorphic52212218 (13.3)
 Myxoid and Round cell43201216
 Pleomorphic9011002
Total, n (%)96 (91.4)5 (4.8)4 (3.8)P=0.043
9 (8.6)
Figure 3

PIK3CA mutations in liposarcoma detected by pyrosequencing

A. Wild-type and exon 9 E545K (G1633A) mutations. B. Wild-type and exon 20 H1047R (A3140G) mutations.

PIK3CA mutations in liposarcoma detected by pyrosequencing

A. Wild-type and exon 9 E545K (G1633A) mutations. B. Wild-type and exon 20 H1047R (A3140G) mutations. With respect to histologic subtype, PIK3CA mutations were more frequent in well-differentiated/dedifferentiated tumors compared with myxoid/round cell/pleomorphic tumors (Table 4, 13.3% vs. 2.2%, P=0.043). Of all mutated tumors, 6 tumors (66.7%) were myxoid/round cell, 2 tumors (22.2%) were pleomorphic, and 1 tumor (11.1%) was well-differentiated (Table 4, Supplementary Table 1). There were no statistically significant differences in PIK3CA mutation based on sex, age, tumor size, and primary tumor sites (Supplementary Table 1). We also performed analyses to examine the association between PIK3CA mutations and survival outcome. PIK3CA mutation was not associated with a significant difference in DFS or OS (data not shown, p=0.739 and p=0.376, respectively)

Correlation between PIK3CA mutation and copy number status

There were 82 cases with complete data on PIK3CA mutation and copy number status (Supplementary Table 2). Although not statistically significant, PIK3CA mutations were more frequent in the cases of copy number gain. Of the 7 tumors with PIK3CA mutation, 3 tumors (21.4%) exhibited copy number gain, whereas only 4 tumors (5.9%) had normal copy numbers.

DISCUSSION

We conducted this study to examine the frequency and prognostic impact of PIK3CA mutations and amplifications in patients with curatively resected liposarcoma. To our knowledge, this is the first study evaluating the prognostic impact of PIK3CA polysomy and amplification in a large cohort of Asian liposarcoma patients. We demonstrated that PIK3CA aberration is a poor prognostic factor in liposarcoma. Accumulating evidence has suggested different outcomes for the major histologic subtypes of liposarcoma. Therefore, histologic classification is known as a most strong prognostic factor for survival [13-16]. Among the 5 subtypes of liposarcoma, well-differentiated and myxoid liposarcoma had the most favorable prognoses, while dedifferentiated, round cell, and pleomorphic liposarcomas often manifest with clinically aggressive behavior and distant metastasis. Overall, with use of conventional doxorubicin-based chemotherapy, median survival remains less than 12 months for patients with metastatic/unresectable tumors [17]. The limited improvement after conventional therapy treatment prompts us to explore the molecular biology and identify prognostic and druggable biomarkers. Despite known targeted therapeutic options in solid tumors (KIT or PDGFRA mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors), STS still lacks therapeutically relevant genetic alterations. Even knowledge of genetic alteration frequency is limited. A recent comprehensive genome study reported frequently mutated genes, including TP53, NF1, and PIK3CA, in STS [11]. Among them, PIK3CA mutation was observed in 18% of myxoid/round cell liposarcomas. Therefore, PIK3CA may be a putative driver gene in liposarcoma, with available therapeutic agents worthwhile. Activation of the PI3K pathway, generally as result of PIK3CA amplification, has been demonstrated in 12% cases of lung cancer, 32% cases of head and neck cancer, and 24% cases of ovarian cancer [18-20]. Regarding the prognostic role of PIK3CA amplification, the results have been controversial. In head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, PIK3CA amplification led to earlier recurrence [18]. For nasopharyngeal carcinoma, amplification was associated with distant metastasis, advanced stage, and poor OS [21]. On the other hand, amplification played no significant role in squamous cell lung cancer cohort [8]. Clinicopathologic heterogeneity, including primary tumor site, pathologic stage, and adjuvant treatment, may contribute to these controversial results. However, because of its rarity of sarcoma, no exact frequency of PIK3CA amplification has been identified in sarcoma. Only The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data had reported 1% frequency of PIK3CA amplification and few comparable studies were reported with clinical cases. In our study, by carefully assessing a large cohort of liposarcoma cases, we were able to clarify the prognostic value of PIK3CA amplification in a homogenous patient population. PIK3CA amplification was significantly associated with poor DFS regardless of gender, age, histology, or tumor location, as an independent prognostic factor in curatively resected liposarcoma. To evaluate PIK3CA copy number gain, we used FISH. Previous studies defined PIK3CA/CEP3≥2 [22-24] as PIK3CA amplification, and some studies used PIK3CA>4 [18, 25]. In our large cohort study, we used a combination of these criteria and demonstrated that amplification and polysomy have significant prognostic impacts on liposarcoma patients. FISH is an easy and useful method by which one can visualize individual cancer cells in routine clinical practice. Our criteria need further validation in future clinical trials with targeted agents. Mutations in the PIK3CA gene are mostly located within hotspots in exons 9 and 20 and lead to PI3K pathway activation [26]. Regarding the prognostic significance of PIK3CA mutation, previous reports yielded controversial results [6, 26–29]. PIK3CA mutation has been reported 14–18.3% of myxoid/round-cell liposarcoma and associated with shorter DFS with mass spectrometry-based genotyping [11, 12]. Here, we report PIK3CA mutations in 8.6% of liposarcoma by employing a pyrosequencing approach and not associated with prognostic outcome. Although the majority of mutant tumors (66.6%) were of the myxoid/round-cell subtype, additional mutant cases were also detected in well-differentiated, dedifferentiated, and pleomorphic liposarcoma. The limited sensitivity of sequencing method may result in low frequency or clinical outcome and further studies are warranted. Despite first-line standard treatment with doxorubicin, median survival remains dismal. gemcitabine and docetaxel are frequently used as second-line treatment for STS [30]. While the total response rate for all patients is 16%, only 2 out of 20 liposarcoma patients had stable disease at 6 months. Pazopanib was another potential breakthrough as a salvage treatment for STS [31]. However, pazopanib showed favorable efficacy in patients with leiomyosarcoma and synovial sarcoma, but not in adipocytic sarcoma [32]. Similar outcomes were observed in our Asian STS patients who received pazopanib treatment [33]. Therefore, exploration of therapeutically tractable target based on molecular biology is strongly warranted. Recently, local amplification of the 12q13-15 regions, which contain copies of CDK4, was reported in well-differentiated liposarcoma [34]. However, because that subtype is relatively indolent and easily curable with surgical resection, CDK4 inhibitors are not necessary for treatment of well differentiated liposarcoma [16]. In our study, we found frequent aberrations of the PIK3CA gene mainly in the aggressive subtypes (round cell and pleomorphic), and it is worth considering as a therapeutic target. PIK3CA amplification and/or mutation are associated with increased activity of the PI3K effector pAkt, suggesting that amplified or mutated tumors may be sensitive to PI3K inhibitors [22, 35]. In lung cancer cell lines, 37% of squamous cell harbored PIK3CA amplification and they were sensitive to PI3K inhibitor GDC-0941 with less than 1μmol/L of IC50 [35]. In a preclinical platform from Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia, PIK3CA-amplified tumors were sensitive to BYL719, a PI3K α-selective inhibitor [36]. Cell lines with PIK3CA amplification was positively associated with BYL719 sensitivity (P=0.0037) and tumor-bearing mice with PIK3CA amplification responded to BYL719, leading to a response rate of −18% (lung cancer) and −80% (gastric cancer). Despite preliminary data, recent phase I trials have explored the potential predictive role of the PIK3CA gene. In a phase I trial with GDC-0941, a heavily treated ovarian cancer patient with PIK3CA amplification experienced disease stabilization for 4 months with significant pharmacodynamic changes [37]. While previous trials with PI3K inhibitors have been conducted in non-selected patients, recent clinical trials with PI3K inhibitors are ongoing for those with PIK3CA gene alterations (ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT01928459 and NCT01608022). As shown in our study, liposarcoma may be a promising potential candidate for use of PI3K inhibitors. Further study with preclinical model is warranted to validate the therapeutic role in sarcoma. Here, we report PIK3CA aberration as an independent poor prognostic factor for curatively resected liposarcoma. Our findings also indicate that PIK3CA inhibitor is a promising therapeutic target for liposarcoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients and tumor tissues

This study was conducted in a cohort of patients with liposarcoma who underwent curative resection at Severance Hospital, Busan Paik Hospital, and Ilsan Paik Hospital. A total of 125 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded primary liposarcoma specimens were available for examination of PIK3CA aberrations. All diagnoses were reviewed by two experienced pathologists (LJS and HSK) in conjunction with immunohistochemical staining data. Only those cases of confirmed liposarcoma containing tissue adequate for analytic purposes were included. Liposarcoma was classified into 5 histologic subgroups based on Evans Classification [38]: well-differentiated, myxoid, dedifferentiated, round, and pleomorphic. Patient information was collected by reviewing the medical records for evaluations of clinicopathologic characteristics and survival outcomes. Primary tumors were located in the extremity, retroperitoneum/intra-abdominal region, inguinal area/genital organs, and other.

PIK3CA gene copy number analysis

To assess the presence of PIK3CA gene amplifications, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) assays were performed using a PIK3CA probe that hybridizes to the band 3q26.32 with a Texas Red tag (red) and centromere3 (CEN3) with a FITC tag (green) (Abbott Molecular, Abbott Park, IL), according to routine methods. At least 60 nuclei were evaluated per sample. Twenty contiguous tumor cell nuclei were analyzed from three representative foci. PIK3CA amplification was defined based on previous studies [22, 23, 25, 39]. PIK3CA amplification was defined as if one of the following criteria is fulfilled: (1) PIK3CA/CEN3 ratio was ≥2.0 or (2) the average PIK3CA signal per nucleus >4.0. Polysomy was defined as an average PIK3CA signal per nucleus 4.0 ≥ to > 2.0.

PIK3CA mutational analysis

Genomic DNA was extracted from 125 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue specimens using a QIAamp DNA FFPE Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), according to the manufacturer's instructions. We used a pyrosequencing assay covering the mutational hotspots of interest to sequence exons 9 and 20 of PIK3CA [40]. The exon 9 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers were PIK3CA 9-F, 5′-biotin-AACAGCTCAAAGCAATTTCTACACG-3′, and PIK3CA 9-R, 5′-ACCTGTGACTCCATAGAAAATCTTT-3′. The exon 20 PCR primers were PIK3CA 20-F, 5′-biotin-CAAGAGGCTTTGGAGTATTTCA-3′, and PIK3CA 20-R, 5′-CAATCCATTTTTGTTGTCCA-3′. Each PCR mix contained the forward and reverse primers (10 μM each), 12.5 mM dNTP mix, 3 mM MgCl2, 1× PCR buffer, 1 U of AmpliTaq Gold, and 100 ng of sample genomic DNA in a total volume of 25 μL. PCR conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 minutes; 50 cycles of 94°C for 30 seconds, 58°C for 30 seconds, and 72°C for 40 seconds; and final extension at 72°C for 10 minutes. The PCR products were electrophoresed in an agarose gel to confirm successful amplification. The PCR products were sequenced using the PyroMark Q24 system (QIAGEN, Germantown, MD, USA), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Sequencing analysis was performed using PyroMark Q24 software version 1.0.10 in the allele quantification analysis mode.

Statistical methods

Associations between histologic features and clinical significance were examined using the χ2 test or Fisher's exact test where appropriate. Differences were statistically significant when the P-value was <0.05. Disease-free survival (DFS) was defined as the time from surgery to recurrence or last contact. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from surgery to death or last contact. Patients who were alive and had no recurrence at the last follow-up were censored. DFS and OS distributions were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The log-rank test was used to determine survival differences between groups. Regression analyses of survival data, based on the Cox proportional hazards model, were conducted on DFS and OS. All data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences Version 20.0 Software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).
  39 in total

1.  Pazopanib for metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma (PALETTE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Winette T A van der Graaf; Jean-Yves Blay; Sant P Chawla; Dong-Wan Kim; Binh Bui-Nguyen; Paolo G Casali; Patrick Schöffski; Massimo Aglietta; Arthur P Staddon; Yasuo Beppu; Axel Le Cesne; Hans Gelderblom; Ian R Judson; Nobuhito Araki; Monia Ouali; Sandrine Marreaud; Rachel Hodge; Mohammed R Dewji; Corneel Coens; George D Demetri; Christopher D Fletcher; Angelo Paolo Dei Tos; Peter Hohenberger
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Liposarcoma: a study of 55 cases with a reassessment of its classification.

Authors:  H L Evans
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 6.394

3.  Genetic alterations and their relationship in the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway in thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Peng Hou; Dingxie Liu; Yuan Shan; Shuiying Hu; Kimberley Studeman; Stephen Condouris; Yangang Wang; Ariel Trink; Adel K El-Naggar; Giovanni Tallini; Vasily Vasko; Mingzhao Xing
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Frequent PIK3CA gene amplification and its clinical significance in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Zeenath Jehan; Prashant Bavi; Mehar Sultana; Jehad Abubaker; Rong Bu; Azhar Hussain; Ghazi Alsbeih; Nasser Al-Sanea; Alaa Abduljabbar; Luai H Ashari; Samar Alhomoud; Fouad Al-Dayel; Shahab Uddin; Khawla S Al-Kuraya
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 7.996

5.  Pazopanib, a multikinase angiogenesis inhibitor, in patients with relapsed or refractory advanced soft tissue sarcoma: a phase II study from the European organisation for research and treatment of cancer-soft tissue and bone sarcoma group (EORTC study 62043).

Authors:  Stefan Sleijfer; Isabelle Ray-Coquard; Zsuzsa Papai; Axel Le Cesne; Michelle Scurr; Patrick Schöffski; Françoise Collin; Lini Pandite; Sandrine Marreaud; Annick De Brauwer; Martine van Glabbeke; Jaap Verweij; Jean-Yves Blay
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Oncogenic mutations of PIK3CA in human cancers.

Authors:  Yardena Samuels; Victor E Velculescu
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2004-10-12       Impact factor: 4.534

7.  PIK3CA mutation in colorectal cancer: relationship with genetic and epigenetic alterations.

Authors:  Katsuhiko Nosho; Takako Kawasaki; Mutsuko Ohnishi; Yuko Suemoto; Gregory J Kirkner; Dimity Zepf; Liying Yan; Janina A Longtine; Charles S Fuchs; Shuji Ogino
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.715

8.  PIK3CA amplification associates with resistance to chemotherapy in ovarian cancer patients.

Authors:  Iwona K Kolasa; Alina Rembiszewska; Anna Felisiak; Izabela Ziolkowska-Seta; Magdalena Murawska; Joanna Moes; Agnieszka Timorek; Agnieszka Dansonka-Mieszkowska; Jolanta Kupryjanczyk
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2009-01-17       Impact factor: 4.742

9.  Randomized phase II study of gemcitabine and docetaxel compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcomas: results of sarcoma alliance for research through collaboration study 002 [corrected].

Authors:  Robert G Maki; J Kyle Wathen; Shreyaskumar R Patel; Dennis A Priebat; Scott H Okuno; Brian Samuels; Michael Fanucchi; David C Harmon; Scott M Schuetze; Denise Reinke; Peter F Thall; Robert S Benjamin; Laurence H Baker; Martee L Hensley
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-07-01       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  First-in-human phase I study of pictilisib (GDC-0941), a potent pan-class I phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Authors:  Debashis Sarker; Joo Ern Ang; Richard Baird; Rebecca Kristeleit; Krunal Shah; Victor Moreno; Paul A Clarke; Florence I Raynaud; Gallia Levy; Joseph A Ware; Kathryn Mazina; Ray Lin; Jenny Wu; Jill Fredrickson; Jill M Spoerke; Mark R Lackner; Yibing Yan; Lori S Friedman; Stan B Kaye; Mika K Derynck; Paul Workman; Johann S de Bono
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 12.531

View more
  1 in total

1.  PIK3CA and KRAS Amplification in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma and their Impact on the Inflammatory Tumor Microenvironment and Prognosis.

Authors:  Ahlem Essakly; Heike Loeser; Max Kraemer; Hakan Alakus; Seung-Hun Chon; Thomas Zander; Reinhard Buettner; Axel M Hillmer; Christiane J Bruns; Wolfgang Schroeder; Florian Gebauer; Alexander Quaas
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 4.243

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.