Literature DB >> 27016388

Postural threat influences conscious perception of postural sway.

Taylor W Cleworth1, Mark G Carpenter2.   

Abstract

This study examined how changes in threat influenced conscious perceptions of postural sway. Young healthy adults stood on a forceplate mounted to a hydraulic lift placed at two heights (0.8m and 3.2m). At each height, subjects stood quietly with eyes open and eyes closed for 60s. Subjects were instructed to either stand normal, or stand normal and track their perceived sway in the antero-posterior plane by rotating a hand-held potentiometer. Participants reported an increased level of fear, anxiety, arousal and a decreased level of balance confidence when standing at height. In addition, postural sway amplitude decreased and frequency increased at height. However, there were no effects of height on perceived sway. When standing under conditions of increased postural threat, sway amplitude is reduced, while sway perception appears to remain unchanged. Therefore, when threat is increased, sensory gain may be increased to compensate for postural strategies that reduce sway (i.e. stiffening strategy), thereby ensuring sufficient afferent information is available to maintain, or even increase the conscious perception of postural sway.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Balance; Fear; Perception; Postural threat

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27016388     DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.03.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  9 in total

1.  Increased human stretch reflex dynamic sensitivity with height-induced postural threat.

Authors:  Brian C Horslen; Martin Zaback; J Timothy Inglis; Jean-Sébastien Blouin; Mark G Carpenter
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Anxiety does not always affect balance: the predominating role of cognitive engagement in a video gaming task.

Authors:  B S DeCouto; A M Williams; K R Lohse; S H Creem-Regehr; D L Strayer; P C Fino
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 2.064

3.  Differences in static postural control between top level male volleyball players and non-athletes.

Authors:  Dorota Borzucka; Krzysztof Kręcisz; Zbigniew Rektor; Michał Kuczyński
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Head movement differs for positive and negative emotions in video recordings of sitting individuals.

Authors:  Maciej Behnke; Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze; Lukasz D Kaczmarek
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Responses to balance challenges in persons with panic disorder: A pilot study of computerized static and dynamic balance measurements.

Authors:  Revital Amiaz; Shani Kimel Naor; Asaf Caspi; Efrat Czerniak; Shlomo Noy; Tatiana Pelc; Matti Mintz; Meir Plotnik
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 2.708

6.  Adaptation of balancing behaviour during continuous perturbations of stance. Supra-postural visual tasks and platform translation frequency modulate adaptation rate.

Authors:  Stefania Sozzi; Antonio Nardone; Marco Schieppati
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  New Insights on Emotional Contributions to Human Postural Control.

Authors:  Allan L Adkin; Mark G Carpenter
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  The Effects of Cognitive Task and Change of Height on Postural Stability and Cardiovascular Stress in Workers Working at Height.

Authors:  Magdalena Cyma-Wejchenig; Janusz Maciaszek; Katarzyna Marciniak; Rafał Stemplewski
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Consciously processing balance leads to distorted perceptions of instability in older adults.

Authors:  Toby J Ellmers; Elmar C Kal; William R Young
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 4.849

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.