| Literature DB >> 27014972 |
Xianyu Li1,2, Jing Jiang1, Xinyuan Zhao1, Yan Zhao1, Qichen Cao1, Qing Zhao1, Huanhuan Han1, Jifeng Wang1, Zixiang Yu1, Bo Peng1, Wantao Ying1, Xiaohong Qian1.
Abstract
Cancer cell metastasis is a major cause of cancer fatality. But the underlying molecular mechanisms remain incompletely understood, which results in the lack of efficient diagnosis, therapy and prevention approaches. Here, we report a systematic study on the secretory proteins (secretome) and secretory N-glycoproteins (N-glycosecretome) of four human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cell lines with different metastatic potential, to explore the molecular mechanism of metastasis and supply the clues for effective measurement of diagnosis and therapy. Totally, 6242 unique gene products (GPs) and 1637 unique N-glycosites from 635 GPs were confidently identified. About 4000 GPs on average were quantified in each of the cell lines, 1156 of which show differential expression (p<0.05). Ninety-nine percentage of the significantly altered proteins were secretory proteins and proteins correlated to cell movement were significantly activated with the increasing of metastatic potential of the cell lines. Twenty-three GPs increased both in the secretome and the N-glycosecretome were chosen as candidates and verified by western blot analysis, and 10 of them were chosen for immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis. The cumulative survival rates of the patients with candidate (FAT1, DKK3) suggested that these proteins might be used as biomarkers for HCC diagnosis. In addition, a comparative analysis with the published core human plasma database (1754 GPs) revealed that there were 182 proteins not presented in the human plasma database but identified by our studies, some of which were selected and verified successfully by western blotting in human plasma.Entities:
Keywords: N-glycoproteomics; OFFGEL fractionation; hepatocellular carcinoma; label-free quantitation; metastasis; secretome; zic-HILIC
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27014972 PMCID: PMC5008342 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.8247
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Figure 1Overview of the experimental workflow
The secretory proteins were collected and the secretome and N-glycosecretome were profiled for the four HCC cell lines. Peptide prefractionation was performed using the isoelectric focusing (IEF) electrophoresis. The N-glycosylated peptides were enriched using zwitterionic hydrophilic interaction chromatography (zic-HILIC) methods. The peptide mixture was analyzed with online reversed-phase chromatography and mass spectrometry and label-free approach was used for the quantitative analysis.
Figure 2Summary of identification and quantitative analysis of the secretome
A. The rigorous evaluation of the dataset by applying the parsimony principle filter in peptide grouping.B. The number of highly confident genes products (GPs) identified in HCC cell lines. C. Overlap of proteins between the different HCC cell lines. D. Overlap of proteins identified between the HCC secretome dataset and core human plasma database. E. Pearson correlation coefficients between the measurements of four HCC cell lines.
Figure 3Label-free quantitative analysis of significant altered proteins in the secretome analysis
A. Three major clusters extracted from these proteins by K-Means clustering. B. The enriched biological pathways in cluster 1 and cluster 3 viewed by MetaCore.
Figure 4Gene Ontology (GO) annotation of the N-glycosecretome
Figure 5Selection and validation of the candidates for HCC metastasis by western blotting
A. The results of western blotting of the 13 differentially displayed secretome and N-glycosecretome GPs. B. The trends of the protein abundance, either from western blotting or from the label-free analysis. The gray lines stand for the WB results and the red or yellow lines represent the MS data.
Figure 6Validation of the candidates by immunohistochemistry in tissue microarray
Positive immunoreactivity for six secretome proteins was observed primarily in the cytoplasm and one in extracellular matrix using tissue array from 75 cases of liver cancer patients. Representative IHC from the positive samples (magnification ×200) A. and the negative samples (magnification ×200) B. are shown.
The relationship between the clinical pathological features of HCC and DKK3
| Clinicopathological | Tumor DKK3 Expression | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | Negative | ||
| Male | 22 | 42 | 0.185 |
| Female | 1 | 10 | |
| ≤50 | 9 | 18 | 0.853 |
| >50 | 15 | 33 | |
| ≤5cm | 19 | 29 | 0.060 |
| >5cm | 5 | 22 | |
| Absent | 12 | 33 | 0.534 |
| Present | 10 | 20 | |
| Absent | 19 | 47 | 0.217 |
| Present | 5 | 4 | |
| I-II | 3 | 6 | 0.645 |
| II | 12 | 31 | |
| II-III | 9 | 14 | |
| I | 13 | 10 | 0.007 |
| II | 7 | 19 | |
| IIIA | 1 | 10 | |
| IIIB | 2 | 6 | |
| IIIC-IV | 1 | 6 | |
Candidate expression was scored independently by two pathologists. Intensity of staining was scored as 0 (negative), 1 (weak), or 2 (strong), and the extent of staining was based on the percentage of positive tumor cells: 0 (negative), 1 (1%to 25%), 2 (26% to 50%), 3 (51% to 75%), and 4 (76% to 100%). The final score of each sample was assessed by summarizing the result of intensity and extent of staining. Therefore, each case was finally considered negative if the final score was 0 to 1 (±) or 2 to 3 (±) and positive if the final score was 4 to 5 (±) or 6 to7 (±), respectively.
HCC with microscopic portal vein tumor thrombosis or macroscopic portal veinthrombosis indicates tumor venous invasion.
Grading of differentiation status was performed according to the method of Edmondson and Steiner. The tumors were classified into two groups: well differentiated (grades I and II) and poorly differentiated (grades III and IV), by pathological examination
Statistical analyses were conducted with Fisher's exact test for all the parameters. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
The pTNM classification for HCC was based on The American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer staging system (7th edition, 2002).
Figure 7Validation of the candidates by cumulative survival rates analysis
The 10-month, 20-month, and 30-month cumulative survival A. and hazard B. rates of patients with the candidates (FAT1, DKK3, NrCAM, LUM, VNN1, ADAM15).