Literature DB >> 27013690

Long-Term Stability of Motor Cortical Activity: Implications for Brain Machine Interfaces and Optimal Feedback Control.

Robert D Flint1, Michael R Scheid1, Zachary A Wright1, Sara A Solla2, Marc W Slutzky3.   

Abstract

The human motor system is capable of remarkably precise control of movements--consider the skill of professional baseball pitchers or surgeons. This precise control relies upon stable representations of movements in the brain. Here, we investigated the stability of cortical activity at multiple spatial and temporal scales by recording local field potentials (LFPs) and action potentials (multiunit spikes, MSPs) while two monkeys controlled a cursor either with their hand or directly from the brain using a brain-machine interface. LFPs and some MSPs were remarkably stable over time periods ranging from 3 d to over 3 years; overall, LFPs were significantly more stable than spikes. We then assessed whether the stability of all neural activity, or just a subset of activity, was necessary to achieve stable behavior. We showed that projections of neural activity into the subspace relevant to the task (the "task-relevant space") were significantly more stable than were projections into the task-irrelevant (or "task-null") space. This provides cortical evidence in support of the minimum intervention principle, which proposes that optimal feedback control (OFC) allows the brain to tightly control only activity in the task-relevant space while allowing activity in the task-irrelevant space to vary substantially from trial to trial. We found that the brain appears capable of maintaining stable movement representations for extremely long periods of time, particularly so for neural activity in the task-relevant space, which agrees with OFC predictions. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: It is unknown whether cortical signals are stable for more than a few weeks. Here, we demonstrate that motor cortical signals can exhibit high stability over several years. This result is particularly important to brain-machine interfaces because it could enable stable performance with infrequent recalibration. Although we can maintain movement accuracy over time, movement components that are unrelated to the goals of a task (such as elbow position during reaching) often vary from trial to trial. This is consistent with the minimum intervention principle of optimal feedback control. We provide evidence that the motor cortex acts according to this principle: cortical activity is more stable in the task-relevant space and more variable in the task-irrelevant space.
Copyright © 2016 the authors 0270-6474/16/363623-10$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LFPs; brain–machine interface; minimum intervention; motor cortex; optimal feedback control; stability

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27013690      PMCID: PMC4804017          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2339-15.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  50 in total

1.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination.

Authors:  Emanuel Todorov; Michael I Jordan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Reduction of single-neuron firing uncertainty by cortical ensembles during motor skill learning.

Authors:  Dana Cohen; Miguel A L Nicolelis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-04-07       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Local field potentials allow accurate decoding of muscle activity.

Authors:  Robert D Flint; Christian Ethier; Emily R Oby; Lee E Miller; Marc W Slutzky
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Muscle coordination is habitual rather than optimal.

Authors:  Aymar de Rugy; Gerald E Loeb; Timothy J Carroll
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Functional network reorganization during learning in a brain-computer interface paradigm.

Authors:  Beata Jarosiewicz; Steven M Chase; George W Fraser; Meel Velliste; Robert E Kass; Andrew B Schwartz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  An optimal control model for maximum-height human jumping.

Authors:  M G Pandy; F E Zajac; E Sim; W S Levine
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Statistical assessment of the stability of neural movement representations.

Authors:  Ian H Stevenson; Anil Cherian; Brian M London; Nicholas A Sachs; Eric Lindberg; Jacob Reimer; Marc W Slutzky; Nicholas G Hatsopoulos; Lee E Miller; Konrad P Kording
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Closed-loop decoder adaptation shapes neural plasticity for skillful neuroprosthetic control.

Authors:  Amy L Orsborn; Helene G Moorman; Simon A Overduin; Maryam M Shanechi; Dragan F Dimitrov; Jose M Carmena
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Performance sustaining intracortical neural prostheses.

Authors:  Paul Nuyujukian; Jonathan C Kao; Joline M Fan; Sergey D Stavisky; Stephen I Ryu; Krishna V Shenoy
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  Neural constraints on learning.

Authors:  Patrick T Sadtler; Kristin M Quick; Matthew D Golub; Steven M Chase; Stephen I Ryu; Elizabeth C Tyler-Kabara; Byron M Yu; Aaron P Batista
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  33 in total

Review 1.  Physiological properties of brain-machine interface input signals.

Authors:  Marc W Slutzky; Robert D Flint
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Latent Factors and Dynamics in Motor Cortex and Their Application to Brain-Machine Interfaces.

Authors:  Chethan Pandarinath; K Cora Ames; Abigail A Russo; Ali Farshchian; Lee E Miller; Eva L Dyer; Jonathan C Kao
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Speech-related dorsal motor cortex activity does not interfere with iBCI cursor control.

Authors:  Sergey D Stavisky; Francis R Willett; Donald T Avansino; Leigh R Hochberg; Krishna V Shenoy; Jaimie M Henderson
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 4.  Computation Through Neural Population Dynamics.

Authors:  Saurabh Vyas; Matthew D Golub; David Sussillo; Krishna V Shenoy
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 12.449

5.  Plug-and-play control of a brain-computer interface through neural map stabilization.

Authors:  Daniel B Silversmith; Reza Abiri; Nicholas F Hardy; Nikhilesh Natraj; Adelyn Tu-Chan; Edward F Chang; Karunesh Ganguly
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 54.908

6.  Continuous Force Decoding from Deep Brain Local Field Potentials for Brain Computer Interfacing.

Authors:  Syed A Shah; Huiling Tan; Peter Brown
Journal:  Int IEEE EMBS Conf Neural Eng       Date:  2017

7.  Response to "Contribution of EEG signals to brain-machine interfaces".

Authors:  Marc W Slutzky; Robert D Flint
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  A neural network for online spike classification that improves decoding accuracy.

Authors:  Deepa Issar; Ryan C Williamson; Sanjeev B Khanna; Matthew A Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 9.  Neural Manifolds for the Control of Movement.

Authors:  Juan A Gallego; Matthew G Perich; Lee E Miller; Sara A Solla
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Continuous decoding of human grasp kinematics using epidural and subdural signals.

Authors:  Robert D Flint; Joshua M Rosenow; Matthew C Tate; Marc W Slutzky
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 5.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.