| Literature DB >> 27013475 |
Samantha M O'Loughlin1, Stephen M Magesa2,3, Charles Mbogo4,5, Franklin Mosha6, Janet Midega4,7,8, Austin Burt9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Population genomic features such as nucleotide diversity and linkage disequilibrium are expected to be strongly shaped by changes in population size, and might therefore be useful for monitoring the success of a control campaign. In the Kilifi district of Kenya, there has been a marked decline in the abundance of the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae subsequent to the rollout of insecticide-treated bed nets.Entities:
Keywords: Anopheles gambiae; Kilifi; Linkage disequilibrium; Pest management; Population control; Population recombination
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27013475 PMCID: PMC4806450 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-016-1214-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Metrics of data sets containing variant and invariant sites
| Species | No. indivs. | No. of tag | No. bp | Mean | Mean dist | No. of SNPsa | Mean (Max) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 24 | 2033 | 172,655 | 88 | 131 | 6387 (6437) | 3.14 (17) |
|
| 36 | 2049 | 129,315 | 106 | 130 | 5137 (5195) | 2.51 (23) |
|
| 12 | 2280 | 253,043 | 134 | 115 | 4135 (4161) | 1.81 (13) |
aNumber in brackets shows number of SNPs in variant only data sets. Bayesian variant calling resulted in slightly different numbers of SNPs in variant only vs genotype data sets
Fig. 1Simulations to show the genomic consequences of population crashes of different strengths and timing. a π; b ρ; c θW; d Tajima’s D. Each plot shows simulations of different size population crashes at 10, 100, 1000 and 10,000 generations before present (x-axis), with post-crash population sizes of 10−2, 10−3, 10−4 and 10−5 (lines). a–c y-axis is log10 scale. Dashed lines indicate two ρ values that were zero. Error bars= ± one standard error. Based on five simulations per scenario except decline of 10−5 1000 gens ago where only two simulations resulted in sufficient segregating sites for calculating statistics
Fig. 2Sample size adjusted r2 values for autosomes by genetic distance. a–d The r2 values were averaged in log10 bins for each autosome arm separately. a 2L; b 2R; c 3L; d 3R. d also shows the average r2 for unlinked loci on separate chromosomes (specifically between sites on 2L and 3L). e The r2 values were averaged across bins of 10 bp from 0 to 110 and averaged for all autosomes. SNPs within the 2La, 2Rb and 3Ra inversions were removed before r2 was calculated
Fig. 3Empirical data: θW, Tajima’s D, ρ and ρ/θW for each species, population and autosome. ρ and θW are per base. Note the log scale on the y-axis for ρ and ρ/θW. Inversion-less chromosome 3L is hatched for emphasis. Tajima’s D and θW from [13]
Fig. 4Contour plot from regression model. Contours show predicted values of log (ρ + 1/50,000). Dotted line shows the estimated ρ value from Kilifi samples
Fig. 5Plots of homozygosity for three Kilifi An. gambiae individuals. Shaded areas show runs of over 4.5 Mb where only homozygous sites are present