Literature DB >> 27013175

Obdiplostemony: the occurrence of a transitional stage linking robust flower configurations.

Louis Ronse De Craene1, Kester Bull-Hereñu2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Obdiplostemony has long been a controversial condition as it diverges from diplostemony found among most core eudicot orders by the more external insertion of the alternisepalous stamens. In this paper we review the definition and occurrence of obdiplostemony, and analyse how the condition has impacted on floral diversification and species evolution. KEY
RESULTS: Obdiplostemony represents an amalgamation of at least five different floral developmental pathways, all of them leading to the external positioning of the alternisepalous stamen whorl within a two-whorled androecium. In secondary obdiplostemony the antesepalous stamens arise before the alternisepalous stamens. The position of alternisepalous stamens at maturity is more external due to subtle shifts of stamens linked to a weakening of the alternisepalous sector including stamen and petal (type I), alternisepalous stamens arising de facto externally of antesepalous stamens (type II) or alternisepalous stamens shifting outside due to the sterilization of antesepalous stamens (type III: Sapotaceae). In primary obdiplostemony the alternisepalous stamens arise before the antesepalous stamens and are more externally from initiation. The antesepalous stamen whorl is staminodial and shows a tendency for loss (type I), or the petals are missing and the alternisepalous stamens effectively occupy their space (type II). Although obdiplostemony is often related to an isomerous gynoecium, this is not essential. Phylogenetically, both secondary and primary obdiplostemony can be seen as transitional stages from diplostemony to either haplostemony or obhaplostemony. Obdiplostemony is the consequence of shifts in the balance between the two stamen whorls, affecting either the alternisepalous stamens together with the petals, or the antesepalous stamens.
CONCLUSIONS: We advocate a broad definition of obdiplostemony, to include androecia with incomplete whorls, staminodial whorls, anisomerous gynoecia and an absence of petals. As such, the taxonomic significance of obdiplostemony is transient, although it is a clear illustration of how developmental flexibility is responsible for highly different floral morphs.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Keywords:  asterids; common petal–stamen primordia; diplostemony; floral bauplan; haplostemony; isomery; obdiplostemony; obhaplostemony; petal loss; rosids; staminodes

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27013175      PMCID: PMC4845804          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcw017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  8 in total

1.  Floral ontogeny, pattern formation, and evolution in Hibbertia and Adrastaea (Dilleniaceae).

Authors:  S C Tucker; P Bernhardt
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.844

2.  Synorganisation without organ fusion in the flowers of Geranium robertianum (Geraniaceae) and its not so trivial obdiplostemony.

Authors:  Peter K Endress
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Androecial evolution in Caryophyllales in light of a paraphyletic Molluginaceae.

Authors:  Samuel Brockington; Patricia Dos Santos; Beverley Glover; Louis Ronse De Craene
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 3.844

4.  Molecular phylogeny and floral evolution of Penaeaceae, Oliniaceae, Rhynchocalycaceae, and Alzateaceae (Myrtales).

Authors:  Jürg Schönenberger; Elena Conti
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.844

5.  Ontogeny of floral organs in flax (Linum usitatissimum; Linaceae).

Authors:  Lauren C Schewe; Vipen K Sawhney; Arthur R Davis
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 3.844

6.  Floral ontogeny of Ruteae (Rutaceae) and its systematic implications.

Authors:  L Wei; Y-Z Wang; Z-Y Li
Journal:  Plant Biol (Stuttg)       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 3.081

7.  Floral morphology and development in Quillajaceae and Surianaceae (Fabales), the species-poor relatives of Leguminosae and Polygalaceae.

Authors:  M A Bello; J A Hawkins; P J Rudall
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 4.357

8.  Phylogenetic Relationships and Evolution of the Androecia in Ruteae (Rutaceae).

Authors:  Lai Wei; Xiao-Guo Xiang; Yin-Zheng Wang; Zhen-Yu Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total
  5 in total

1.  What is the nature of petals in Caryophyllaceae? Developmental evidence clarifies their evolutionary origin.

Authors:  Lai Wei; Louis Ronse De Craene
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  The relationship between nectaries and floral architecture: a case study in Geraniaceae and Hypseocharitaceae.

Authors:  Julius Jeiter; Hartmut H Hilger; Erik F Smets; Maximilian Weigend
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 3.  Understanding the role of floral development in the evolution of angiosperm flowers: clarifications from a historical and physico-dynamic perspective.

Authors:  Louis Ronse De Craene
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 2.629

4.  Fossil flowers from the early Palaeocene of Patagonia, Argentina, with affinity to Schizomerieae (Cunoniaceae).

Authors:  Nathan A Jud; Maria A Gandolfo; Ari Iglesias; Peter Wilf
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 5.  Mechanical Forces in Floral Development.

Authors:  Kester Bull-Hereñu; Patricia Dos Santos; João Felipe Ginefra Toni; Juliana Hanna Leite El Ottra; Pakkapol Thaowetsuwan; Julius Jeiter; Louis Philippe Ronse De Craene; Akitoshi Iwamoto
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.