Literature DB >> 29589194

Understanding the role of floral development in the evolution of angiosperm flowers: clarifications from a historical and physico-dynamic perspective.

Louis Ronse De Craene1.   

Abstract

Flower morphology results from the interaction of an established genetic program, the influence of external forces induced by pollination systems, and physical forces acting before, during and after initiation. Floral ontogeny, as the process of development from a meristem to a fully developed flower, can be approached either from a historical perspective, as a "recapitulation of the phylogeny" mainly explained as a process of genetic mutations through time, or from a physico-dynamic perspective, where time, spatial pressures, and growth processes are determining factors in creating the floral morphospace. The first (historical) perspective clarifies how flower morphology is the result of development over time, where evolutionary changes are only possible using building blocks that are available at a certain stage in the developmental history. Flowers are regulated by genetically determined constraints and development clarifies specific transitions between different floral morphs. These constraints are the result of inherent mutations or are induced by the interaction of flowers with pollinators. The second (physico-dynamic) perspective explains how changes in the physical environment of apical meristems create shifts in ontogeny and this is reflected in the morphospace of flowers. Changes in morphology are mainly induced by shifts in space, caused by the time of initiation (heterochrony), pressure of organs, and alterations of the size of the floral meristem, and these operate independently or in parallel with genetic factors. A number of examples demonstrate this interaction and its importance in the establishment of different floral forms. Both perspectives are complementary and should be considered in the understanding of factors regulating floral development. It is suggested that floral evolution is the result of alternating bursts of physical constraints and genetic stabilization processes following each other in succession. Future research needs to combine these different perspectives in understanding the evolution of floral systems and their diversification.

Keywords:  Floral meristem; Genetics; Heterochrony; Morphospace; Organ pressure; Size change

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29589194     DOI: 10.1007/s10265-018-1021-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plant Res        ISSN: 0918-9440            Impact factor:   2.629


  95 in total

1.  Symmetry in Flowers: Diversity and Evolution.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Plant Sci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.785

2.  Floral ontogeny in Astragalus compactus (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae: Galegeae): variable occurrence of bracteoles and variable patterns of sepal initiation.

Authors:  Somayeh Naghiloo; Mohammad Reza Dadpour; Ali Movafeghi
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2011-11-05       Impact factor: 4.116

Review 3.  Flower development and evolution: gene duplication, diversification and redeployment.

Authors:  Vivian F Irish; Amy Litt
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.578

Review 4.  From ABC genes to regulatory networks, epigenetic landscapes and flower morphogenesis: making biological sense of theoretical approaches.

Authors:  Elena R Alvarez-Buylla; Eugenio Azpeitia; Rafael Barrio; Mariana Benítez; Pablo Padilla-Longoria
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 7.727

5.  Comparative floral ontogeny in Detarieae (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae). 2. Zygomorphic taxa with petal and stamen suppression.

Authors:  Shirley C Tucker
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.844

Review 6.  Adaptation in flower form: a comparative evodevo approach.

Authors:  Chelsea D Specht; Dianella G Howarth
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 10.151

7.  Towards an ontogenetic understanding of inflorescence diversity.

Authors:  Regine Claßen-Bockhoff; Kester Bull-Hereñu
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 4.357

8.  The ontogenetic bases for variation in ovary position in Melastomataceae.

Authors:  João Paulo Basso-Alves; Renato Goldenberg; Simone Pádua Teixeira
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.844

9.  Flower or spikelet? Understanding the morphology and development of reproductive structures in Exocarya (Cyperaceae, Mapanioideae, Chrysitricheae).

Authors:  Jennifer H Richards; Jeremy J Bruhl; Karen L Wilson
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.844

Review 10.  The floral morphospace--a modern comparative approach to study angiosperm evolution.

Authors:  Marion Chartier; Florian Jabbour; Sylvain Gerber; Philipp Mitteroecker; Hervé Sauquet; Maria von Balthazar; Yannick Staedler; Peter R Crane; Jürg Schönenberger
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 10.151

View more
  17 in total

1.  What is the nature of petals in Caryophyllaceae? Developmental evidence clarifies their evolutionary origin.

Authors:  Lai Wei; Louis Ronse De Craene
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  New year's greetings 2019 from the Journal of Plant Research.

Authors:  Kouki Hikosaka
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.629

3.  Implications of region-specific gene expression for development of the partially fused petunia corolla.

Authors:  Jill C Preston; Beck Powers; Jamie L Kostyun; Heather Driscoll; Fan Zhang; Jinshun Zhong
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 6.417

4.  Floral development of petaloid Alismatales as an insight into the origin of the trimerous Bauplan in monocot flowers.

Authors:  Akitoshi Iwamoto; Ayaka Nakamura; Shinichi Kurihara; Ayumi Otani; Louis P Ronse De Craene
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 2.629

5.  Floral meristem size and organ number correlation in Eucryphia (Cunoniaceae).

Authors:  Kester Bull-Hereñu; Louis Ronse de Craene; Fernanda Pérez
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 2.629

6.  Floral development: re-evaluation of its importance.

Authors:  Akitoshi Iwamoto; Kester Bull-Hereñu
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 2.629

Review 7.  Gynoecium structure in Sapindales and a case study of Trichilia pallens (Meliaceae).

Authors:  Juliana Hanna Leite El Ottra; Gladys Flávia de Albuquerque Melo-de-Pinna; Diego Demarco; José Rubens Pirani; Louis P Ronse De Craene
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 2.629

8.  Pollination features and floral volatiles of Gymnospermium scipetarum (Berberidaceae).

Authors:  Leonardo Rosati; Vito Antonio Romano; Luca Cerone; Simonetta Fascetti; Giovanna Potenza; Erika Bazzato; Davide Cillo; Marisabel Mecca; Rocco Racioppi; Maurizio D'Auria; Emmanuele Farris
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 2.629

9.  Diversity of petals in Berberidaceae: development, micromorphology, and structure of floral nectaries.

Authors:  Shan Su; Liang Zhao; Yi Ren; Xiao-Hui Zhang
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 3.356

Review 10.  Developmental stochasticity and variation in floral phyllotaxis.

Authors:  Miho S Kitazawa
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 2.629

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.