| Literature DB >> 27013101 |
Gary J Lewis1, Simon R Cox2, Tom Booth3, Susana Muñoz Maniega4, Natalie A Royle4, Maria Valdés Hernández4, Joanna M Wardlaw4, Mark E Bastin4, Ian J Deary3.
Abstract
Establishing the neural bases of individual differences in personality has been an enduring topic of interest. However, while a growing literature has sought to characterize grey matter correlates of personality traits, little attention to date has been focused on regional white matter correlates of personality, especially for the personality traits agreeableness, conscientiousness and openness. To rectify this gap in knowledge we used a large sample (n > 550) of older adults who provided data on both personality (International Personality Item Pool) and white matter tract-specific fractional anisotropy (FA) from diffusion tensor MRI. Results indicated that conscientiousness was associated with greater FA in the left uncinate fasciculus (β = 0.17, P < 0.001). We also examined links between FA and the personality meta-trait 'stability', which is defined as the common variance underlying agreeableness, conscientiousness, and neuroticism/emotional stability. We observed an association between left uncinate fasciculus FA and stability (β = 0.27, P < 0.001), which fully accounted for the link between left uncinate fasciculus FA and conscientiousness. In sum, these results provide novel evidence for links between regional white matter microstructure and key traits of human personality, specifically conscientiousness and the meta-trait, stability. Future research is recommended to replicate and address the causal directions of these associations.Entities:
Keywords: conscientiousness; fractional anisotropy; personality; stability; uncinate fasciculus; white matter microstructure
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27013101 PMCID: PMC4967799 DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsw037
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci ISSN: 1749-5016 Impact factor: 3.436
Correlations between white-matter FA and personality traits (agreeableness, conscientiousness and openness) for the hypothesized links
| Agreeableness | Conscientiousness | Openness | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corpus callosum genu | 0.03 | 0.41 | 0.03 | 0.41 | ||
| L uncinate fasciculus | 0.13 | 0.17 | 0.07 | 0.10 | ||
| R uncinate fasciculus | 0.05 | 0.19 | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.23 | |
| L anterior thalamic radiation | 0.06 | 0.17 | ||||
| R anterior thalamic radiation | 0.09 | |||||
Note: Uncorrected P-values for all correlations; L, left; R, right; significant P-values are bolded; blank cells denote that associations were not hypothesized a priori. Exploratory results are reported in Table 2.
Correlations between white-matter FA and personality traits (agreeableness, conscientiousness and openness) for the exploratory analyses (FDR-corrected P-values)
| Agreeableness | Conscientiousness | Openness | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corpus callosum genu | −0.02 | 0.72 | ||||
| Corpus callosum splenium | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.06 | 0.26 | 0.02 | 0.72 |
| L anterior thalamic radiation | 0.05 | 0.37 | 0.06 | 0.28 | ||
| R anterior thalamic radiation | 0.03 | 0.65 | 0.12 | |||
| L cingulum | 0.06 | 0.28 | 0.13 | 0.03 | 0.59 | |
| R cingulum | 0.05 | 0.37 | 0.14 | 0.06 | 0.28 | |
| L arcuate fasciculus | 0.04 | 0.45 | 0.12 | −0.02 | 0.72 | |
| R arcuate fasciculus | 0.02 | 0.75 | 0.06 | 0.28 | 0.01 | 0.82 |
| L inf. longitudinal fasciculus | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.06 | 0.28 | ||
| R inf. longitudinal fasciculus | 0.07 | 0.20 | 0.13 | −0.01 | 0.89 | |
Note: FDR corrected P-values for all correlations; L, left; R, right; inf., inferior; significant P-values are bolded; blank cells denote that associations were hypothesized a priori. These results are reported in Table 1.
Fig. 1.Structural equation model test of association between meta-trait stability and left uncinate fasciculus FA (Panel A without controlling for mean tract integrity, Panel B controlling for mean tract integrity).Note: Model fit statistics (Panel 1A/1B, respectively): χ2 = 0.02/1.27, df = 2/4, P = 0.99/0.87; RMSEA = 0.00/0.00; CFI = 1.0/1.0; all path values are standardized coefficients; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01; the variance of the latent factor for stability was constrained to 1; model estimation was performed using full information maximum-likelihood; emotional stability reflects the opposite of neuroticism.