Literature DB >> 27012577

Orthodontic retention--three methods trialed.

J Faith Cope1, Thomas Lamont2.   

Abstract

DESIGN: Single centre randomised controlled trial. INTERVENTION: Patients treated by a single orthodontist were randomised to one of three retention methods: removable vacuum-formed retainer (VFR) covering the palate and the maxillary anterior teeth from canine-to-canine and bonded canine-to-canine retainer in the lower arch (group V-CTC); maxillary VFR combined with stripping of the lower anterior teeth (group V-S); prefabricated positioner covering all erupted teeth in the maxilla and the mandible (group P). All retention appliances were provided within one hour of debonding. OUTCOME MEASURE: Dental study casts were taken before treatment, at appliance removal and five years or more out of retention. Little's irregularity index, intercanine and intermolar width, arch length and overbite/overjet were recorded.
RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were randomised to each group with 69 completing the two-year retention period (24 in V-CTC group; 23 in V-S group; 22 in P group). Forty-nine patients were available five years post retention (16 in V-CTC group; 17 in V-S group; 16 in P group). No significant differences were found between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: After five years or more out of retention, the three retention methods had achieved equally favourable clinical results. Thus a maxillary VFR combined with a bonded canine-to-canine retainer in the mandible, a maxillary VFR combined with stripping of the mandibular anterior teeth and a prefabricated positioner can all be recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27012577     DOI: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6401157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evid Based Dent        ISSN: 1462-0049


  6 in total

1.  Failure evaluation after a 6-year retention period: a comparison between glass fiber-reinforced (GFR) and multistranded bonded retainers.

Authors:  Eugenio Bolla; Mauro Cozzani; Tiziana Doldo; Mattia Fontana
Journal:  Int Orthod       Date:  2012-01-11

Review 2.  Retention procedures for stabilising tooth position after treatment with orthodontic braces.

Authors:  S J Littlewood; D T Millett; B Doubleday; D R Bearn; H V Worthington
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-01-25

Review 3.  Failure of fixed orthodontic retainers: A systematic review.

Authors:  Anna Iliadi; Dimitrios Kloukos; Nikolaos Gkantidis; Christos Katsaros; Nikolaos Pandis
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  An evaluation of changes in mandibular anterior alignment from 10 to 20 years postretention.

Authors:  R M Little; R A Riedel; J Artun
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Physiologic recovery following orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  S L Horowitz; E H Hixon
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1969-01

Review 6.  Retention procedures for stabilising tooth position after treatment with orthodontic braces.

Authors:  Simon J Littlewood; Declan T Millett; Bridget Doubleday; David R Bearn; Helen V Worthington
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-01-29
  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  One-year comparative assessment of retention of arch width increases between modified vacuum-formed and Hawley retainers.

Authors:  Asma Ashari; Lew Xian; Alizae Marny Fadzlin Syed Mohamed; Rohaya Megat Abdul Wahab; Yeoh Chiew Kit; Malathi Deva Tata; Sindhu Sinnasamy; Elavarasi Kuppusamy
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 2.079

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.