Literature DB >> 27009426

SIDCER informed consent form: principles and a developmental guideline.

Nut Koonrungsesomboon1, Junjira Laothavorn2, Vichai Chokevivat3, Kenji Hirayama4, Juntra Karbwang5.   

Abstract

The quality of informed consent forms (ICFs) remains an issue in clinical research. The lengthy and complicated ICFs currently being used lower research participants' ability to read and understand the information provided therein. In collaboration with the Strategic Initiative for Developing Capacity in Ethical Review (SIDCER), we have developed the SIDCER ICF, which could be of value in improving the quality of the ICFs. The three principles underlying the SIDCER ICF were: (i) an ICF contains all the required regulatory elements; (ii) an ICF provides only such information as is relevant for the subject's decision-making; and (iii) an ICF presents information in a simple format that conveys relevant information to the target population. The SIDCER ICF template, with its instructions, was then structured to assist an investigator in developing an enhanced ICF according to the three principles. The applicability of the SIDCER ICF was tested using a phase I study protocol, and a variety of experts with a special interest in ethics and clinical research were invited to evaluate the comprehensiveness of the three-page ICF for the phase I study. The SIDCER ICF template was refined and finalised in accordance with the results and comments from the experts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27009426     DOI: 10.20529/IJME.2016.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0974-8466


  9 in total

1.  Informational needs for participation in bioequivalence studies: the perspectives of experienced volunteers.

Authors:  Nut Koonrungsesomboon; Saranyapin Potikanond; Mingkwan Na Takuathung; Wutigri Nimlamool; Juntra Karbwang
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Improved participants' understanding of research information in real settings using the SIDCER informed consent form: a randomized-controlled informed consent study nested with eight clinical trials.

Authors:  Nut Koonrungsesomboon; Thipaporn Tharavanij; Kittichet Phiphatpatthamaamphan; Ratha-Korn Vilaichone; Sudsayam Manuwong; Parichat Curry; Sith Siramolpiwat; Thanachai Punchaipornpon; Supakit Kanitnate; Nattapol Tammachote; Rodsarin Yamprasert; Waipoj Chanvimalueng; Ruchirat Kaewkumpai; Soiphet Netanong; Peerapong Kitipawong; Paskorn Sritipsukho; Juntra Karbwang
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-11-12       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Can we make informed consent forms more informative?

Authors:  Elizabeth E Foglia
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 5.747

4.  An integrated conceptual framework for evaluating and improving 'understanding' in informed consent.

Authors:  Sabine Bossert; Daniel Strech
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  What information and the extent of information research participants need in informed consent forms: a multi-country survey.

Authors:  Juntra Karbwang; Nut Koonrungsesomboon; Cristina E Torres; Edlyn B Jimenez; Gurpreet Kaur; Roli Mathur; Eti N Sholikhah; Chandanie Wanigatunge; Chih-Shung Wong; Kwanchanok Yimtae; Murnilina Abdul Malek; Liyana Ahamad Fouzi; Aisyah Ali; Beng Z Chan; Madawa Chandratilake; Shoen C Chiew; Melvyn Y C Chin; Manori Gamage; Irene Gitek; Mohammad Hakimi; Narwani Hussin; Mohd F A Jamil; Pavithra Janarsan; Madarina Julia; Suman Kanungo; Panduka Karunanayake; Sattian Kollanthavelu; Kian K Kong; Bing-Ling Kueh; Ragini Kulkarni; Paul P Kumaran; Ranjith Kumarasiri; Wei H Lim; Xin J Lim; Fatihah Mahmud; Jacinto B V Mantaring; Siti M Md Ali; Nurain Mohd Noor; Kopalasuntharam Muhunthan; Elanngovan Nagandran; Maisarah Noor; Kim H Ooi; Jebananthy A Pradeepan; Ahmad H Sadewa; Nilakshi Samaranayake; Shalini Sri Ranganathan; Wasanthi Subasingha; Sivasangari Subramaniam; Nadirah Sulaiman; Ju F Tay; Leh H Teng; Mei M Tew; Thipaporn Tharavanij; Peter S K Tok; Jayanie Weeratna; Tri Wibawa; Renu Wickremasinghe; Phanthipha Wongwai; Subhash Yadav
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 2.652

6.  The quality of consent form structure in biomedical research: a study from Jordan and Sudan.

Authors:  Mariam Abbas Ibrahim; Osama Y Alshogran; Omar F Khabour; Karem H Alzoubi
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2019-09-02

7.  Improved parental understanding by an enhanced informed consent form: a randomized controlled study nested in a paediatric drug trial.

Authors:  Nut Koonrungsesomboon; Chanchai Traivaree; Charnunnut Tiyapsane; Juntra Karbwang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Co-creation with research participants to inform the design of electronic informed consent.

Authors:  Evelien De Sutter; David Geerts; Pascal Borry; Kristien Coteur; Dorien Bamps; Heleen Marynissen; Els Ampe; Els Geenens; Marleen Depré; Isabelle Huys
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2022-06-26

9.  How informed are our subjects?

Authors:  Ravindra B Ghooi
Journal:  Perspect Clin Res       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.