OBJECTIVE: We present the framework for wearable joint rehabilitation assessment following musculoskeletal injury. We propose a multimodal sensing (i.e., contact based and airborne measurement of joint acoustic emission) system for at-home monitoring. METHODS: We used three types of microphones-electret, MEMS, and piezoelectric film microphones-to obtain joint sounds in healthy collegiate athletes during unloaded flexion/extension, and we evaluated the robustness of each microphone's measurements via: 1) signal quality and 2) within-day consistency. RESULTS: First, air microphones acquired higher quality signals than contact microphones (signal-to-noise-and-interference ratio of 11.7 and 12.4 dB for electret and MEMS, respectively, versus 8.4 dB for piezoelectric). Furthermore, air microphones measured similar acoustic signatures on the skin and 5 cm off the skin (∼4.5× smaller amplitude). Second, the main acoustic event during repetitive motions occurred at consistent joint angles (intra-class correlation coefficient ICC(1, 1) = 0.94 and ICC(1, k) = 0.99). Additionally, we found that this angular location was similar between right and left legs, with asymmetry observed in only a few individuals. CONCLUSION: We recommend using air microphones for wearable joint sound sensing; for practical implementation of contact microphones in a wearable device, interface noise must be reduced. Importantly, we show that airborne signals can be measured consistently and that healthy left and right knees often produce a similar pattern in acoustic emissions. SIGNIFICANCE: These proposed methods have the potential for enabling knee joint acoustics measurement outside the clinic/lab and permitting long-term monitoring of knee health for patients rehabilitating an acute knee joint injury.
OBJECTIVE: We present the framework for wearable joint rehabilitation assessment following musculoskeletal injury. We propose a multimodal sensing (i.e., contact based and airborne measurement of joint acoustic emission) system for at-home monitoring. METHODS: We used three types of microphones-electret, MEMS, and piezoelectric film microphones-to obtain joint sounds in healthy collegiate athletes during unloaded flexion/extension, and we evaluated the robustness of each microphone's measurements via: 1) signal quality and 2) within-day consistency. RESULTS: First, air microphones acquired higher quality signals than contact microphones (signal-to-noise-and-interference ratio of 11.7 and 12.4 dB for electret and MEMS, respectively, versus 8.4 dB for piezoelectric). Furthermore, air microphones measured similar acoustic signatures on the skin and 5 cm off the skin (∼4.5× smaller amplitude). Second, the main acoustic event during repetitive motions occurred at consistent joint angles (intra-class correlation coefficient ICC(1, 1) = 0.94 and ICC(1, k) = 0.99). Additionally, we found that this angular location was similar between right and left legs, with asymmetry observed in only a few individuals. CONCLUSION: We recommend using air microphones for wearable joint sound sensing; for practical implementation of contact microphones in a wearable device, interface noise must be reduced. Importantly, we show that airborne signals can be measured consistently and that healthy left and right knees often produce a similar pattern in acoustic emissions. SIGNIFICANCE: These proposed methods have the potential for enabling knee joint acoustics measurement outside the clinic/lab and permitting long-term monitoring of knee health for patients rehabilitating an acute knee joint injury.
Authors: Omer T Inan; Daniel C Whittingslow; Caitlin N Teague; Sinan Hersek; Maziyar Baran Pouyan; Mindy Millard-Stafford; Geza F Kogler; Michael N Sawka Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2017-07-27
Authors: Daniel C Whittingslow; Hyeon-Ki Jeong; Venu G Ganti; Nathan J Kirkpatrick; Geza F Kogler; Omer T Inan Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Date: 2019-07-26 Impact factor: 3.934
Authors: Hyeon-Ki Jeong; Maziyar Baran Pouyan; Daniel C Whittingslow; Venu Ganti; Omer T Inan Journal: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng Date: 2018-03 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: Sinan Hersek; Maziyar Baran Pouyan; Caitlin N Teague; Michael N Sawka; Mindy L Millard-Stafford; Geza F Kogler; Paul Wolkoff; Omer T Inan Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2017-08-29 Impact factor: 4.538